Literature DB >> 20068180

Predicting outcomes in cervical cancer: a kinetic model of tumor regression during radiation therapy.

Zhibin Huang1, Nina A Mayr, William T C Yuh, Simon S Lo, Joseph F Montebello, John C Grecula, Lanchun Lu, Kaile Li, Hualin Zhang, Nilendu Gupta, Jian Z Wang.   

Abstract

Applications of mathematical modeling can improve outcome predictions of cancer therapy. Here we present a kinetic model incorporating effects of radiosensitivity, tumor repopulation, and dead-cell resolving on the analysis of tumor volume regression data of 80 cervical cancer patients (stages 1B2-IVA) who underwent radiation therapy. Regression rates and derived model parameters correlated significantly with clinical outcome (P < 0.001; median follow-up: 6.2 years). The 6-year local tumor control rate was 87% versus 54% using radiosensitivity (2-Gy surviving fraction S(2) < 0.70 vs. S(2) > or = 0.70) as a predictor (P = 0.001) and 89% vs. 57% using dead-cell resolving time (T(1/2) < 22 days versus T(1/2) > or = 22 days, P < 0.001). The 6-year disease-specific survival was 73% versus 41% with S(2) < 0.70 versus S(2) > or = 0.70 (P = 0.025), and 87% vs. 52% with T(1/2) < 22 days versus T(1/2) > or = 22 days (P = 0.002). Our approach illustrates the promise of volume-based tumor response modeling to improve early outcome predictions that can be used to enable personalized adaptive therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20068180      PMCID: PMC2822442          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  31 in total

1.  Incorporating biologic measurements (SF(2), CFE) into a tumor control probability model increases their prognostic significance: a study in cervical carcinoma treated with radiation therapy.

Authors:  F M Buffa; S E Davidson; R D Hunter; A E Nahum; C M West
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Method and timing of tumor volume measurement for outcome prediction in cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nina A Mayr; Toshiaki Taoka; William T C Yuh; Leah M Denning; Weining K Zhen; Arnold C Paulino; Robert C Gaston; Joel I Sorosky; Sanford L Meeks; Joan L Walker; Robert S Mannel; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  What is known about tumour proliferation rates to choose between accelerated fractionation or hyperfractionation?

Authors:  K R Trott; J Kummermehr
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Pretreatment proliferation parameters do not add predictive power to clinical factors in cervical cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Richard W Tsang; Stephen Juvet; Melania Pintilie; Richard P Hill; C Shun Wong; Michael Milosevic; William Chapman; Wilfred Levin; Lee A Manchul; Anthony W Fykes
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Prognostic and treatment factors affecting pelvic control of Stage IB and IIA-B carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix treated with radiation therapy alone.

Authors:  W M Mendenhall; T L Thar; F J Bova; R B Marcus; L S Morgan; R R Million
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Evaluation of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer using equivalent uniform dose.

Authors:  Jian Z Wang; X Allen Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Translating response during therapy into ultimate treatment outcome: a personalized 4-dimensional MRI tumor volumetric regression approach in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Nina A Mayr; Jian Z Wang; Simon S Lo; Dongqing Zhang; John C Grecula; Lanchun Lu; Joseph F Montebello; Jeffrey M Fowler; William T C Yuh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  Is there a relationship between repopulation and hypoxia/reoxygenation? Results from human carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  R P Hill; W Fyles; M Milosevic; M Pintilie; R W Tsang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Advanced-stage cervix cancer: rapid tumour growth rather than late diagnosis.

Authors:  P Symonds; B Bolger; D Hole; J H Mao; T Cooke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Measurements using the alkaline comet assay predict bladder cancer cell radiosensitivity.

Authors:  M A L Moneef; B T Sherwood; K J Bowman; R C Kockelbergh; R P Symonds; W P Steward; J K Mellon; G D D Jones
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  16 in total

1.  Sequential magnetic resonance imaging of cervical cancer: the predictive value of absolute tumor volume and regression ratio measured before, during, and after radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jian Z Wang; Nina A Mayr; Dongqing Zhang; Kaile Li; John C Grecula; Joseph F Montebello; Simon S Lo; William T C Yuh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  A mathematical model of tumor growth and its response to single irradiation.

Authors:  Yoichi Watanabe; Erik L Dahlman; Kevin Z Leder; Susanta K Hui
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.432

3.  Onset time of tumor repopulation for cervical cancer: first evidence from clinical data.

Authors:  Zhibin Huang; Nina A Mayr; Mingcheng Gao; Simon S Lo; Jian Z Wang; Guang Jia; William T C Yuh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  A note on modeling of tumor regression for estimation of radiobiological parameters.

Authors:  Hualiang Zhong; Indrin Chetty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Modeling the Cellular Response of Lung Cancer to Radiation Therapy for a Broad Range of Fractionation Schedules.

Authors:  Jeho Jeong; Jung Hun Oh; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Jose Belderbos; Jeffrey D Bradley; Andrew N Fontanella; Shyam S Rao; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Modelling the interplay between hypoxia and proliferation in radiotherapy tumour response.

Authors:  J Jeong; K I Shoghi; J O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Cellular characterization of ultrasound-stimulated microbubble radiation enhancement in a prostate cancer xenograft model.

Authors:  Azza A Al-Mahrouki; Sara Iradji; William Tyler Tran; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.758

8.  Multiparametric [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose/ [18F]Fluoromisonidazole Positron Emission Tomography/ Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer for the Non-Invasive Detection of Tumor Heterogeneity: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Piotr Andrzejewski; Pascal Baltzer; Stephan H Polanec; Alina Sturdza; Dietmar Georg; Thomas H Helbich; Georgios Karanikas; Christoph Grimm; Stephan Polterauer; Richard Poetter; Wolfgang Wadsak; Markus Mitterhauser; Petra Georg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Correlation of Hsp70 Serum Levels with Gross Tumor Volume and Composition of Lymphocyte Subpopulations in Patients with Squamous Cell and Adeno Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Sophie Gunther; Christian Ostheimer; Stefan Stangl; Hanno M Specht; Petra Mozes; Moritz Jesinghaus; Dirk Vordermark; Stephanie E Combs; Friedhelm Peltz; Max P Jung; Gabriele Multhoff
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Tumor radio-sensitivity assessment by means of volume data and magnetic resonance indices measured on prostate tumor bearing rats.

Authors:  Antonella Belfatto; Derek A White; Ralph P Mason; Zhang Zhang; Strahinja Stojadinovic; Guido Baroni; Pietro Cerveri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.