| Literature DB >> 27167829 |
Katja Pinker1,2,3, Piotr Andrzejewski2,4, Pascal Baltzer1,2, Stephan H Polanec1,2, Alina Sturdza4, Dietmar Georg2,4, Thomas H Helbich1, Georgios Karanikas5, Christoph Grimm6,7, Stephan Polterauer6,7, Richard Poetter4, Wolfgang Wadsak5, Markus Mitterhauser5, Petra Georg2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate fused multiparametric positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (MP PET/MRI) at 3T in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, using high-resolution T2-weighted, contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and the radiotracers [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) and [18F]fluoromisonidazol ([18F]FMISO) for the non-invasive detection of tumor heterogeneity for an improved planning of chemo-radiation therapy (CRT).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27167829 PMCID: PMC4864307 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Step-by-step illustration of the rigid registration algorithm.
[18F]FMISO and [18F]FDG/ PET/CT datasets in two separate coordinate systems (yellow and blue) are rigidly registered (CT1-CT2 registration) and merged into one (green). Registration between the green and the red (mpMRI) coordinate system is performed by a rigid transformation of CT2 to fit T1w MRI. The calculated transformation is applied to PET1 and PET2 to create the PET/MRI dataset (purple).
Fig 2Representative examples of voxel-by-voxel correlations between pairs of PET/MRI dataset-derived parameters.
(A) illustrates a weak correlation of the evaluated parameters, i.e., [18F]FMISO- and [18F]FDG-avidity. (B) shows a strong indirect correlation of the evaluated parameters, i.e., initial and delayed enhancement. (C), there is no correlation of the evaluated parameters, i.e., delayed enhancement and [18F]FDG-avidity.
Patients’ age, histopathological diagnoses, tumor volumes, qualitative, i.e WO, IE and quantitative imaging parameters, i.e ADC, [18F]FDG and [18F]FMISO SUVmax and [18F]FMISO TBR for all patients with complete data sets.
| ID | Age | Histopathology | Tumor Volume (cm3) | IE | WO | ADC (x 10−3 mm2/sec) | SUVmax [18F]FDG | SUVmax [18F]FMISO | [18F]FMISO TBR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | SCC | 128.7 | Fast | Wash-out | 0.82 | 16.1 | 2.8 | 2.5 |
| 2 | 58 | SCC | 440 | Fast | Wash-out | 0.77 | 15 | 3.1 | 2.8 |
| 3 | 56 | SCC | 277.4 | Medium | Wash-out | 0.53 | 25.6 | 6 | 4.6 |
| 4 | 36 | SCC | 108.4 | Medium | Wash-out | 0.67 | 11.9 | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| 5 | 38 | SCC | 111.3 | Medium | Wash-out | 0.80 | 21.5 | 2.8 | 2.0 |
| 6 | 72 | SCC | 87.4 | Medium | Wash-out | 0.66 | 16.2 | 2.9 | 2.4 |
| 7 | 58 | SCC | 38 | Fast | Plateau | 0.89 | 12.2 | 4.2 | 2.8 |
| 8 | 54 | SCC | 32.1 | Fast | Plateau | 0.84 | 19.2 | 4.6 | 3.5 |
| 9 | 60 | SCC | 6.2 | Fast | Wash-out | 0.85 | 23.3 | 3.4 | 2.6 |
| 10 | 36 | SCC | 25.3 | Medium | Persistent | 0.71 | 12 | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| 11 | 66 | SCC | 52.1 | Medium | Persistent | 0.91 | 21.4 | 6.4 | 3.8 |
Note: ID—patient identification number, SCC- squamous cell carcinoma, IE—initial enhancement rate, WO—wash-out rate, ADC—apparent diffusion coefficient, SUVmax—maximum standard up-take value, [18F]FDG—[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose, [18F]FMISO—[18F]Fluoromisonidazole, TBR—tumor-to-background ratio.
Fig 3Summary of correlations between tumor volumes and MRI and PET parameters for all eleven patients using descriptive statistics.
Blue indicates a direct and red an indirect (cf. legend on the right) correlation. Correlation coefficients are values dispalyed in larger font and the p-values in smaller font below.
Fig 4Correlations between tumor volumes, MRI, and PET parameters for eight patients using voxel-by-voxel analysis.
Blue indicates a direct and red an indirect (cf. legend on the right) correlation. Correlation coefficients are values dispalyed in larger font and the p-values in smaller font below.