Literature DB >> 23787766

Modelling the interplay between hypoxia and proliferation in radiotherapy tumour response.

J Jeong1, K I Shoghi, J O Deasy.   

Abstract

A tumour control probability computational model for fractionated radiotherapy was developed, with the goal of incorporating the fundamental interplay between hypoxia and proliferation, including reoxygenation over a course of radiotherapy. The fundamental idea is that the local delivery of oxygen and glucose limits the amount of proliferation and metabolically-supported cell survival a tumour sub-volume can support. The model has three compartments: a proliferating compartment of cells receiving oxygen and glucose; an intermediate, metabolically-active compartment receiving glucose; and a highly hypoxic compartment of starving cells. Following the post-mitotic cell death of proliferating cells, intermediate cells move into the proliferative compartment and hypoxic cells move into the intermediate compartment. A key advantage of the proposed model is that the initial compartmental cell distribution is uniquely determined from the assumed local growth fraction (GF) and volume doubling time (TD) values. Varying initial cell state distributions, based on the local (voxel) GF and TD, were simulated. Tumour response was simulated for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using relevant parameter values based on published sources. The tumour dose required to achieve a 50% local control rate (TCD50) was found for various GFs and TD's, and the effect of fraction size on TCD50 was also evaluated. Due to the advantage of reoxygenation over a course of radiotherapy, conventional fraction sizes (2-2.4 Gy fx(-1)) were predicted to result in smaller TCD50's than larger fraction sizes (4-5 Gy fx(-1)) for a 10 cc tumour with GFs of around 0.15. The time to eliminate hypoxic cells (the reoxygenation time) was estimated for a given GF and decreased as GF increased. The extra dose required to overcome accelerated stem cell accumulation in longer treatment schedules was estimated to be 0.68 Gy/day (in EQD26.6), similar to published values derived from clinical data. The model predicts, for a 2 Gy/weekday fractionation, that increased initial proliferation (high GF) should, surprisingly, lead to moderately higher local control values. Tumour hypoxia is predicted to increase the required dose for local control by approximately 30%. Predicted tumour regression patterns are consistent with clinical observations. This simple yet flexible model shows how the local competition for chemical resources might impact local control rates under varying fractionation conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23787766      PMCID: PMC4784425          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/14/4897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  55 in total

1.  Optimization of tumour control probability in hypoxic tumours by radiation dose redistribution: a modelling study.

Authors:  Aste Søvik; Eirik Malinen; Øyvind S Bruland; Søren M Bentzen; Dag Rune Olsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Transient increases of growth fraction during fractionated radiation therapy for cervical carcinoma. Ki-67 and PC10 immunostaining.

Authors:  K Oka; T Nakano; T Hoshi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Radiation-induced vascular damage in tumors: implications of vascular damage in ablative hypofractionated radiotherapy (SBRT and SRS).

Authors:  Heon Joo Park; Robert J Griffin; Susanta Hui; Seymour H Levitt; Chang W Song
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Using computerized video time lapse for quantifying cell death of X-irradiated rat embryo cells transfected with c-myc or c-Ha-ras.

Authors:  H B Forrester; C A Vidair; N Albright; C C Ling; W C Dewey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  The elaboration of a critical framework for understanding cancer: the cancer stem cell hypothesis.

Authors:  Chris Hemmings
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.306

Review 6.  An imaging-based tumour growth and treatment response model: investigating the effect of tumour oxygenation on radiation therapy response.

Authors:  Benjamin Titz; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Prognostic relevance of cell proliferation in head and neck tumors.

Authors:  A Pich; L Chiusa; R Navone
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  The pervasive presence of fluctuating oxygenation in tumors.

Authors:  Laura I Cárdenas-Navia; Daniel Mace; Rachel A Richardson; David F Wilson; Siqing Shan; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Chronic hypoxia decreases synthesis of homologous recombination proteins to offset chemoresistance and radioresistance.

Authors:  Norman Chan; Marianne Koritzinsky; Helen Zhao; Ranjit Bindra; Peter M Glazer; Simon Powell; Abdellah Belmaaza; Brad Wouters; Robert G Bristow
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Proliferation and micromilieu during fractionated irradiation of human FaDu squamous cell carcinoma in nude mice.

Authors:  C Petersen; W Eicheler; A Frömmel; M Krause; S Balschukat; D Zips; M Baumann
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.694

View more
  13 in total

1.  A radiobiological model of radiotherapy response and its correlation with prognostic imaging variables.

Authors:  Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar; Jeho Jeong; Andrew N Fontanella; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Treatment planning evaluation and optimization should be biologically and not dose/volume based.

Authors:  Joseph O Deasy; Charles S Mayo; Colin G Orton
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Modeling the Cellular Response of Lung Cancer to Radiation Therapy for a Broad Range of Fractionation Schedules.

Authors:  Jeho Jeong; Jung Hun Oh; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Jose Belderbos; Jeffrey D Bradley; Andrew N Fontanella; Shyam S Rao; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Beyond the margin recipe: the probability of correct target dosage and tumor control in the presence of a dose limiting structure.

Authors:  Marnix G Witte; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Jeffrey Siebers; Joseph O Deasy; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A genome-based model for adjusting radiotherapy dose (GARD): a retrospective, cohort-based study.

Authors:  Jacob G Scott; Anders Berglund; Michael J Schell; Ivaylo Mihaylov; William J Fulp; Binglin Yue; Eric Welsh; Jimmy J Caudell; Kamran Ahmed; Tobin S Strom; Eric Mellon; Puja Venkat; Peter Johnstone; John Foekens; Jae Lee; Eduardo Moros; William S Dalton; Steven A Eschrich; Howard McLeod; Louis B Harrison; Javier F Torres-Roca
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  A Multi-Compartment Model of Glioma Response to Fractionated Radiation Therapy Parameterized via Time-Resolved Microscopy Data.

Authors:  Junyan Liu; David A Hormuth; Jianchen Yang; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Biophysical Modeling of In Vivo Glioma Response After Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in a Murine Model of Brain Cancer.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Vito Quaranta; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  The relative biological effectiveness of carbon ion radiation therapy for early stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Jeho Jeong; Vicki T Taasti; Andrew Jackson; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Radiosensitivity of Lung Metastases by Primary Histology and Implications for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Using the Genomically Adjusted Radiation Dose.

Authors:  Kamran A Ahmed; Jacob G Scott; John A Arrington; Arash O Naghavi; G Daniel Grass; Bradford A Perez; Jimmy J Caudell; Anders E Berglund; Eric A Welsh; Steven A Eschrich; Thomas J Dilling; Javier F Torres-Roca
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 20.121

10.  Modeling the relationship between fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and tumor radioresistance as a function of the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Jeho Jeong; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.