Literature DB >> 26921069

A mathematical model of tumor growth and its response to single irradiation.

Yoichi Watanabe1, Erik L Dahlman2, Kevin Z Leder3, Susanta K Hui4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mathematical modeling of biological processes is widely used to enhance quantitative understanding of bio-medical phenomena. This quantitative knowledge can be applied in both clinical and experimental settings. Recently, many investigators began studying mathematical models of tumor response to radiation therapy. We developed a simple mathematical model to simulate the growth of tumor volume and its response to a single fraction of high dose irradiation. The modelling study may provide clinicians important insights on radiation therapy strategies through identification of biological factors significantly influencing the treatment effectiveness.
METHODS: We made several key assumptions of the model. Tumor volume is composed of proliferating (or dividing) cancer cells and non-dividing (or dead) cells. Tumor growth rate (or tumor volume doubling time) is proportional to the ratio of the volumes of tumor vasculature and the tumor. The vascular volume grows slower than the tumor by introducing the vascular growth retardation factor, θ. Upon irradiation, the proliferating cells gradually die over a fixed time period after irradiation. Dead cells are cleared away with cell clearance time. The model was applied to simulate pre-treatment growth and post-treatment radiation response of rat rhabdomyosarcoma tumors and metastatic brain tumors of five patients who were treated with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS).
RESULTS: By selecting appropriate model parameters, we showed the temporal variation of the tumors for both the rat experiment and the clinical GKSRS cases could be easily replicated by the simple model. Additionally, the application of our model to the GKSRS cases showed that the α-value, which is an indicator of radiation sensitivity in the LQ model, and the value of θ could be predictors of the post-treatment volume change.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model was successful in representing both the animal experimental data and the clinically observed tumor volume changes. We showed that the model can be used to find the potential biological parameters, which may be able to predict the treatment outcome. However, there is a large statistical uncertainty of the result due to the small sample size. Therefore, a future clinical study with a larger number of patients is needed to confirm the finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26921069      PMCID: PMC4769590          DOI: 10.1186/s12976-016-0032-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model        ISSN: 1742-4682            Impact factor:   2.432


  37 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimaging: do we really need new contrast agents for MRI?

Authors:  T P Roberts; N Chuang; H C Roberts
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Modeling and computer simulations of tumor growth and tumor response to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Klaus Borkenstein; Sabine Levegrün; Peter Peschke
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Single-cell-based computer simulation of the oxygen-dependent tumour response to irradiation.

Authors:  Christine Harting; Peter Peschke; Klaus Borkenstein; Christian P Karger
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05.

Authors:  E Shaw; C Scott; L Souhami; R Dinapoli; R Kline; J Loeffler; N Farnan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Using computerized video time lapse for quantifying cell death of X-irradiated rat embryo cells transfected with c-myc or c-Ha-ras.

Authors:  H B Forrester; C A Vidair; N Albright; C C Ling; W C Dewey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Cervical cancer regression measured using weekly magnetic resonance imaging during fractionated radiotherapy: radiobiologic modeling and correlation with tumor hypoxia.

Authors:  Karen Lim; Philip Chan; Robert Dinniwell; Anthony Fyles; Masoom Haider; Young-Bin Cho; David Jaffray; Lee Manchul; Wilfred Levin; Richard P Hill; Michael Milosevic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  An imaging-based tumour growth and treatment response model: investigating the effect of tumour oxygenation on radiation therapy response.

Authors:  Benjamin Titz; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Tumor response to radiotherapy regulated by endothelial cell apoptosis.

Authors:  Monica Garcia-Barros; Francois Paris; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; David Lyden; Shahin Rafii; Adriana Haimovitz-Friedman; Zvi Fuks; Richard Kolesnick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  A history of the study of solid tumour growth: the contribution of mathematical modelling.

Authors:  R P Araujo; D L S McElwain
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Action of x-rays on mammalian cells.

Authors:  T T PUCK; P I MARCUS
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1956-05-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  8 in total

1.  Untangling the model muddle: Empirical tumour growth in Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease.

Authors:  Rodrigo K Hamede; Nicholas J Beeton; Scott Carver; Menna E Jones
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Modeling long-term tumor growth and kill after combinations of radiation and radiosensitizing agents.

Authors:  Tim Cardilin; Joachim Almquist; Mats Jirstrand; Astrid Zimmermann; Floriane Lignet; Samer El Bawab; Johan Gabrielsson
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Simulation analysis for tumor radiotherapy based on three-component mathematical models.

Authors:  Wen-Song Hong; Gang-Qing Zhang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Exposure-response modeling improves selection of radiation and radiosensitizer combinations.

Authors:  Tim Cardilin; Joachim Almquist; Mats Jirstrand; Astrid Zimmermann; Floriane Lignet; Samer El Bawab; Johan Gabrielsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Multiscale modeling of collective cell migration elucidates the mechanism underlying tumor-stromal interactions in different spatiotemporal scales.

Authors:  Zarifeh Heidary; Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard; Iman Izadi; Nasrin Zare; Jafar Ghaisari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Model-Based Evaluation of Radiation and Radiosensitizing Agents in Oncology.

Authors:  Tim Cardilin; Joachim Almquist; Mats Jirstrand; Astrid Zimmermann; Samer El Bawab; Johan Gabrielsson
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-14

7.  Radiation and PD-(L)1 treatment combinations: immune response and dose optimization via a predictive systems model.

Authors:  Yuri Kosinsky; Simon J Dovedi; Kirill Peskov; Veronika Voronova; Lulu Chu; Helen Tomkinson; Nidal Al-Huniti; Donald R Stanski; Gabriel Helmlinger
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 13.751

Review 8.  Advances in Glioblastoma Multiforme Treatment: New Models for Nanoparticle Therapy.

Authors:  Elif Ozdemir-Kaynak; Amina A Qutub; Ozlem Yesil-Celiktas
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.