Literature DB >> 20503120

Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging.

Manuel D Cerqueira1, Kevin C Allman, Edward P Ficaro, Christopher L Hansen, Kenneth J Nichols, Randall C Thompson, William A Van Decker, Marko Yakovlevitch.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20503120     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-010-9244-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  34 in total

1.  Evaluation of 3D Monte Carlo-based scatter correction for 99mTc cardiac perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Jianbin Xiao; Tim C de Wit; Steven G Staelens; Freek J Beekman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Evaluation of SPECT angular sampling effects: continuous versus step-and-shoot acquisition.

Authors:  J A Bieszk; E G Hawman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Low event rate for stress-only perfusion imaging in patients evaluated for chest pain.

Authors:  Peter B Gibson; Diane Demus; Richard Noto; William Hudson; Lynne L Johnson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Gated stress-only 99mTc myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging accurately assesses coronary artery disease.

Authors:  C A Santana; E V Garcia; J P Vansant; E G Krawczynska; R D Folks; C D Cooke; T L Faber
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.690

5.  Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: a basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  D S Berman; R Hachamovitch; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; F P Wang; J D Friedman; G Germano; K Van Train; G A Diamond
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Ordered subset expectation maximization and wide beam reconstruction "half-time" gated myocardial perfusion SPECT functional imaging: a comparison to "full-time" filtered backprojection.

Authors:  E Gordon DePuey; Ramesh Gadiraju; John Clark; Linda Thompson; Frank Anstett; Shuli C Shwartz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of exercise single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) thallium imaging in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A S Iskandrian; S C Chae; J Heo; C D Stanberry; V Wasserleben; V Cave
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; A Iain McGhie; John D Friedman; James A Case; Jan R Bryngelson; Ginger K Hertenstein; Kelly L Moutray; Kimberly Reid; S James Cullom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure.

Authors:  Su Min Chang; Faisal Nabi; Jiaqiong Xu; Umara Raza; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Multicenter investigation comparing a highly efficient half-time stress-only attenuation correction approach against standard rest-stress Tc-99m SPECT imaging.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; A Iain McGhie; Staci A Courter; Robert A Golub; James A Case; S James Cullom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 5.952
View more
  111 in total

Review 1.  Practical issues regarding the incorporation of PET into a busy SPECT practice.

Authors:  Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Reduced stress dose with rapid acquisition CZT SPECT MPI in a non-obese clinical population: comparison to coronary angiography.

Authors:  W Lane Duvall; Joseph M Sweeny; Lori B Croft; Eric Ginsberg; Krista A Guma; Milena J Henzlova
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Patient-centered imaging.

Authors:  E Gordon Depuey; John J Mahmarian; Todd D Miller; Andrew J Einstein; Christopher L Hansen; Thomas A Holly; Edward J Miller; Donna M Polk; L Samuel Wann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Advances in SPECT camera software and hardware: currently available and new on the horizon.

Authors:  E Gordon DePuey
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Quantitative Nuclear Cardiology: we are almost there!

Authors:  Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  The WOMENs trial: how should I interpret the results?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  The role of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging for asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Brian G Abbott; Timothy M Bateman; Ron Blankstein; Dennis A Calnon; Jeffrey A Leppo; Jamshid Maddahi; Matthew M Schumaecker; Leslee J Shaw; R Parker Ward; David G Wolinsky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Tc-99m adherence and dose reduction in myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Pravin V Patil
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Diagnostic performance of low-dose rest/stress Tc-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT using the 530c CZT camera: quantitative vs visual analysis.

Authors:  Fabio P Esteves; James R Galt; Russell D Folks; Liudmila Verdes; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with a solid-state camera: simulation of a very low dose imaging protocol.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Daniel S Berman; Sean W Hayes; Mathews Fish; Richard Padgett; Yuan Xu; Mark Lemley; Rafael Baavour; Nathaniel Roth; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 10.057
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.