Literature DB >> 20065694

Quickscan dicentric chromosome analysis for radiation biodosimetry.

F N Flegal1, Y Devantier, J P McNamee, R C Wilkins.   

Abstract

The dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) is the gold-standard assay for accurately estimating unknown radiological doses to individuals following radiological or nuclear accidents. However in a mass-casualty scenario, this assay is not well suited for providing timely dose estimates due to its time- and expertise-intensive nature. In Canada, two approaches are being developed in an attempt to increase triage-quality biological dosimetry throughput. These are 1) increasing the number of trained personnel capable of conducting the DCA, and 2) evaluating alternative biodosimetry approaches or DCA variations. In a recent exercise, a new scoring technique (termed DCA QuickScan) was evaluated as an alternative rapid-scoring approach. Triage-quality conventional DCA and DCA QuickScan analysis were based upon scoring a minimum of 50 metaphase cells or 30 dicentrics by 9-15 scorers across four laboratories. Dose estimates for the conventional DCA were found to be within 0.5 Gy of the actual dose for 83% of the unknown samples, while DCA QuickScan dose estimates were within 0.5 Gy for 80% of the samples. Of the dose estimates falling 0.5 Gy or more outside the actual dose, the majority were dose over-estimates. It was concluded that the DCA QuickScan approach can provide critical dose information at a much faster rate than the conventional DCA without sacrificing accuracy. Future studies will further evaluate the accuracy of the DCA QuickScan method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20065694     DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181aba9c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  14 in total

1.  Whole-blood immunoassay for γH2AX as a radiation biodosimetry assay with minimal sample preparation.

Authors:  Matthew L Johnston; Erik F Young; Kenneth L Shepard
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Web-based scoring of the dicentric assay, a collaborative biodosimetric scoring strategy for population triage in large scale radiation accidents.

Authors:  H Romm; E Ainsbury; A Bajinskis; S Barnard; J F Barquinero; L Barrios; C Beinke; R Puig-Casanovas; M Deperas-Kaminska; E Gregoire; U Oestreicher; C Lindholm; J Moquet; K Rothkamm; S Sommer; H Thierens; A Vral; V Vandersickel; A Wojcik
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Developing Human Radiation Biodosimetry Models: Testing Cross-Species Conversion Approaches Using an Ex Vivo Model System.

Authors:  Jin G Park; Sunirmal Paul; Natalia Briones; Jia Zeng; Kristin Gillis; Garrick Wallstrom; Joshua LaBaer; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Radiation Dose-Rate Effects on Gene Expression in a Mouse Biodosimetry Model.

Authors:  Sunirmal Paul; Lubomir B Smilenov; Carl D Elliston; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Physically-based biodosimetry using in vivo EPR of teeth in patients undergoing total body irradiation.

Authors:  Benjamin B Williams; Ruhong Dong; Roberto J Nicolalde; Thomas P Matthews; David J Gladstone; Eugene Demidenko; Bassem I Zaki; Ildar K Salikhov; Piotr N Lesniewski; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Comparison of established and emerging biodosimetry assays.

Authors:  K Rothkamm; C Beinke; H Romm; C Badie; Y Balagurunathan; S Barnard; N Bernard; H Boulay-Greene; M Brengues; A De Amicis; S De Sanctis; R Greither; F Herodin; A Jones; S Kabacik; T Knie; U Kulka; F Lista; P Martigne; A Missel; J Moquet; U Oestreicher; A Peinnequin; T Poyot; U Roessler; H Scherthan; B Terbrueggen; H Thierens; M Valente; A Vral; F Zenhausern; V Meineke; H Braselmann; M Abend
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  A critical assessment of biodosimetry methods for large-scale incidents.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz; Ann Barry Flood; Robert M Gougelet; Michael E Rea; Roberto J Nicolalde; Benjamin B Williams
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Development of a High-Throughput and Miniaturized Cytokinesis-Block Micronucleus Assay for Use as a Biological Dosimetry Population Triage Tool.

Authors:  Stanley W Lue; Mikhail Repin; Ryan Mahnke; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Assessment of biodosimetry methods for a mass-casualty radiological incident: medical response and management considerations.

Authors:  Julie M Sullivan; Pataje G S Prasanna; Marcy B Grace; Lynne K Wathen; Rodney L Wallace; John F Koerner; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Widespread decreased expression of immune function genes in human peripheral blood following radiation exposure.

Authors:  Sunirmal Paul; Lubomir B Smilenov; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.