Literature DB >> 24557539

Web-based scoring of the dicentric assay, a collaborative biodosimetric scoring strategy for population triage in large scale radiation accidents.

H Romm1, E Ainsbury, A Bajinskis, S Barnard, J F Barquinero, L Barrios, C Beinke, R Puig-Casanovas, M Deperas-Kaminska, E Gregoire, U Oestreicher, C Lindholm, J Moquet, K Rothkamm, S Sommer, H Thierens, A Vral, V Vandersickel, A Wojcik.   

Abstract

In the case of a large scale radiation accident high throughput methods of biological dosimetry for population triage are needed to identify individuals requiring clinical treatment. The dicentric assay performed in web-based scoring mode may be a very suitable technique. Within the MULTIBIODOSE EU FP7 project a network is being established of 8 laboratories with expertise in dose estimations based on the dicentric assay. Here, the manual dicentric assay was tested in a web-based scoring mode. More than 23,000 high resolution images of metaphase spreads (only first mitosis) were captured by four laboratories and established as image galleries on the internet (cloud). The galleries included images of a complete dose effect curve (0-5.0 Gy) and three types of irradiation scenarios simulating acute whole body, partial body and protracted exposure. The blood samples had been irradiated in vitro with gamma rays at the University of Ghent, Belgium. Two laboratories provided image galleries from Fluorescence plus Giemsa stained slides (3 h colcemid) and the image galleries from the other two laboratories contained images from Giemsa stained preparations (24 h colcemid). Each of the 8 participating laboratories analysed 3 dose points of the dose effect curve (scoring 100 cells for each point) and 3 unknown dose points (50 cells) for each of the 3 simulated irradiation scenarios. At first all analyses were performed in a QuickScan Mode without scoring individual chromosomes, followed by conventional scoring (only complete cells, 46 centromeres). The calibration curves obtained using these two scoring methods were very similar, with no significant difference in the linear-quadratic curve coefficients. Analysis of variance showed a significant effect of dose on the yield of dicentrics, but no significant effect of the laboratories, different methods of slide preparation or different incubation times used for colcemid. The results obtained to date within the MULTIBIODOSE project by a network of 8 collaborating laboratories throughout Europe are very promising. The dicentric assay in the web based scoring mode as a high throughput scoring strategy is a useful application for biodosimetry in the case of a large scale radiation accident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24557539     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-014-0519-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  19 in total

1.  The role of cytogenetics in early triage of radiation casualties.

Authors:  D C Lloyd; A A Edwards; J E Moquet; Y C Guerrero-Carbajal
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Incident and Emergency Centre of the IAEA.

Authors:  Florian Baciu; Elena Buglova; Rafael Martincic; Rejane Spiegelberg Planer; Warren Stern; Guenther Winkler
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  WHO 1st consultation on the development of a global biodosimetry laboratories network for radiation emergencies (BioDoseNet).

Authors:  William F Blakely; Zhanat Carr; May Chin-May Chu; Renu Dayal-Drager; Kenzo Fujimoto; Michael Hopmeir; Ulrike Kulka; Patricia Lillis-Hearne; Gordon K Livingston; David C Lloyd; Natalie Maznyk; Maria Del Rosario Perez; Horst Romm; Yoshio Takashima; Phillipe Voisin; Ruth C Wilkins; Mitsuaki A Yoshida
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes as a tool in large scale radiation accidents.

Authors:  H Romm; E Ainsbury; S Barnard; L Barrios; J F Barquinero; C Beinke; M Deperas; E Gregoire; A Koivistoinen; C Lindholm; J Moquet; U Oestreicher; R Puig; K Rothkamm; S Sommer; H Thierens; V Vandersickel; A Vral; A Wojcik
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Dose estimation software for radiation biodosimetry.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ainsbury; David C Lloyd
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Strategy for population triage based on dicentric analysis.

Authors:  Aurélie Vaurijoux; Gaëtan Gruel; Frédéric Pouzoulet; Eric Grégoire; Cécile Martin; Sandrine Roch-Lefèvre; Pascale Voisin; Philippe Voisin; Laurence Roy
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  Cytogenetic damage analysed by the dicentric assay.

Authors:  Horst Romm; Ursula Oestreicher; Ulrike Kulka
Journal:  Ann Ist Super Sanita       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.663

8.  Biological dosimetry by the triage dicentric chromosome assay: potential implications for treatment of acute radiation syndrome in radiological mass casualties.

Authors:  Horst Romm; Ruth C Wilkins; C Norman Coleman; Patricia K Lillis-Hearne; Terry C Pellmar; Gordon K Livingston; Akio A Awa; Mark S Jenkins; Mitsuaki A Yoshida; Ursula Oestreicher; Pataje G S Prasanna
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Realising the European Network of Biodosimetry (RENEB).

Authors:  U Kulka; L Ainsbury; M Atkinson; J F Barquinero; L Barrios; C Beinke; G Bognar; A Cucu; F Darroudi; P Fattibene; O Gil; E Gregoire; V Hadjidekova; S Haghdoost; R Herranz; A Jaworska; C Lindholm; R Mkacher; S Mörtl; A Montoro; J Moquet; M Moreno; A Ogbazghi; U Oestreicher; F Palitti; G Pantelias; I Popescu; M J Prieto; H Romm; K Rothkamm; L Sabatier; S Sommer; G Terzoudi; A Testa; H Thierens; F Trompier; I Turai; V Vandersickel; P Vaz; P Voisin; A Vral; F Ugletveit; C Woda; A Wojcik
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  The capacity, capabilities and needs of the WHO BioDoseNet member laboratories.

Authors:  N A Maznyk; R C Wilkins; Z Carr; D C Lloyd
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 0.972

View more
  7 in total

1.  EPRBioDose 2013: EPR applications and biological dosimetry.

Authors:  A Wieser; F Darroudi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Comparing seven mitogens with PHA-M for improved lymphocyte stimulation in dicentric chromosome analysis for biodosimetry.

Authors:  C Beinke; M Port; A Lamkowski; M Abend
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 3.  State-of-the-Art Advances in Radiation Biodosimetry for Mass Casualty Events Involving Radiation Exposure.

Authors:  Mary Sproull; Kevin Camphausen
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Optimizing the Microscopy Time Schedule for Chromosomal Dosimetry of High-dose and Partial-body Irradiations.

Authors:  Volodymyr A Vinnikov
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2017-01-23

Review 5.  The Application of Imaging Flow Cytometry to High-Throughput Biodosimetry.

Authors:  Ruth C Wilkins; Matthew A Rodrigues; Lindsay A Beaton-Green
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2017-01-23

6.  Comparative gene expression analysis after exposure to 123I-iododeoxyuridine, γ- and α-radiation-potential biomarkers for the discrimination of radiation qualities.

Authors:  Marcus Unverricht-Yeboah; Ulrich Giesen; Ralf Kriehuber
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Use of human lymphocyte G0 PCCs to detect intra- and inter-chromosomal aberrations for early radiation biodosimetry and retrospective assessment of radiation-induced effects.

Authors:  Terri L Ryan; Antonio G Pantelias; Georgia I Terzoudi; Gabriel E Pantelias; Adayabalam S Balajee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.