Literature DB >> 20064885

Construct validity of a mammography processes of change scale and invariance by stage of change.

Sandi L Pruitt1, Amy McQueen, Jasmin A Tiro, William Rakowski, Carlo C Diclemente, Sally W Vernon.   

Abstract

The development and use of validated processes of change (POC) measures have received little attention in the literature despite their importance in the Transtheoretical Model. Using survey data (N = 2909), we examined the construct validity of a 22-item mammography POC scale by testing for factorial validity and factorial invariance across stage of change. We also used MANOVA with Tukey post-hoc tests to confirm stage differences in POC use (concurrent validity). Our results confirm the a priori correlated four-factor structure of this scale and provide some support for the measurement equivalence of this scale across stage, supporting comparisons of POC use across stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20064885      PMCID: PMC2860450          DOI: 10.1177/1359105309342305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  24 in total

Review 1.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research.

Authors:  R C MacCallum; J T Austin
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 2.  Repeat mammography: prevalence estimates and considerations for assessment.

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; William Rakowski; Laura B Bonacore
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2003-12

3.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  The stages and processes of exercise adoption and maintenance in a worksite sample.

Authors:  B H Marcus; J S Rossi; V C Selby; R S Niaura; D B Abrams
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Applying the transtheoretical model to cancer screening behavior.

Authors:  Leslie Spencer; Francie Pagell; Troy Adams
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

6.  Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography.

Authors:  W Rakowski; C E Dube; B H Marcus; J O Prochaska; W F Velicer; D B Abrams
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 7.  Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework.

Authors:  Steven E Gregorich
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Validation of scales measuring attitudes and norms related to mammography screening in women veterans.

Authors:  Jasmin A Tiro; Pamela M Diamond; Catherine A Perz; Maria Fernandez; William Rakowski; Carlo C DiClemente; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Comparisons of tailored mammography interventions at two months postintervention.

Authors:  Victoria L Champion; Celette Sugg Skinner; Usha Menon; Roopa Seshadri; Deborah C Anzalone; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2002

10.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  3 in total

1.  Validity of the process of change for colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.

Authors:  Katherine DuHamel; Yuelin Li; William Rakowski; Parisa Samimi; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-06

2.  Processes of Change for Colonoscopy: Limited Support for Use Among Navigated Latinos.

Authors:  Gina Cotter; Katherine DuHamel; Elizabeth Schofield; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2018-10-09

3.  Assessment of processes of change for weight management in a UK sample.

Authors:  Ana Andrés; Carmina Saldaña; Rebecca J Beeken
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.942

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.