Literature DB >> 16287401

Validation of scales measuring attitudes and norms related to mammography screening in women veterans.

Jasmin A Tiro1, Pamela M Diamond, Catherine A Perz, Maria Fernandez, William Rakowski, Carlo C DiClemente, Sally W Vernon.   

Abstract

Validation of psychosocial measures for use in mammography screening research has been given inadequate attention in the literature. The authors report on the validation of 5 measures examining 4 attitudinal constructs (i.e., pros, cons, outcome expectations, and cancer worries) and 1 social influence construct (i.e., subjective norms) in a 22-item inventory. The study participants consisted of a national, randomly sampled population of women veterans (n = 2,910). After minor revision of scales, the authors found independent measures for 4 constructs: pros, cons, cancer worries, and subjective norms. The authors concluded that these scales have acceptable psychometric properties; support construct validity; and provide brief, reliable, and valid measures of attitudes toward and norms regarding mammography screening. These scales may be useful for intervention research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16287401     DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.6.555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  13 in total

1.  Predictors of perceived susceptibility of breast cancer and changes over time: a mixed modeling approach.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Paul R Swank; Lori A Bastian; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Understanding narrative effects: the impact of breast cancer survivor stories on message processing, attitudes, and beliefs among African American women.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Matthew W Kreuter; Bindu Kalesan; Kassandra I Alcaraz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Relationships between decisional balance and stage of adopting mammography and Pap testing among Chinese American women.

Authors:  Carol Strong; Wenchi Liang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Construct validity and invariance of four factors associated with colorectal cancer screening across gender, race, and prior screening.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Evaluation of a Mammography Screening Decision Aid for Women Aged 75 and Older: Protocol for a Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Christine E Kistler; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Angela Fagerlin; Roger B Davis; Christina C Wee; Edward R Marcantonio; Carmen L Lewis; Whitney A Stanley; Trisha M Crutchfield; Mary Beth Hamel
Journal:  J Clin Trials       Date:  2014

6.  Competitive testing of health behavior theories: how do benefits, barriers, subjective norm, and intention influence mammography behavior?

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Sally W Vernon; Pamela M Diamond; Jasmin A Tiro
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2014-02

7.  Construct validity of a mammography processes of change scale and invariance by stage of change.

Authors:  Sandi L Pruitt; Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; William Rakowski; Carlo C Diclemente; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2010-01

8.  Influence of demographic factors, knowledge, and beliefs on Jordanian women's intention to undergo mammography screening.

Authors:  Areej K Othman; Marc T Kiviniemi; Yow-Wu B Wu; Robin M Lally
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.176

9.  Promoting regular mammography screening II. Results from a randomized controlled trial in US women veterans.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Deborah J del Junco; Jasmin A Tiro; Sharon P Coan; Catherine A Perz; Lori A Bastian; William Rakowski; Wen Chan; David R Lairson; Amy McQueen; Maria E Fernandez; Cynthia Warrick; Arada Halder; Carlo DiClemente
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Effect of a Mammography Screening Decision Aid for Women 75 Years and Older: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Christine E Kistler; Adlin Pinheiro; Alicia R Jacobson; Gianna M Aliberti; Maria Karamourtopoulos; Michelle Hayes; Bridget A Neville; Carmen L Lewis; Christina C Wee; Angela Fagerlin; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Edward R Marcantonio; Mary Beth Hamel; Roger B Davis
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.