Literature DB >> 21165726

Validity of the process of change for colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.

Katherine DuHamel1, Yuelin Li, William Rakowski, Parisa Samimi, Lina Jandorf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Process of change (POC) is a construct of the transtheoretical model that proposes to promote healthy behaviors.
PURPOSE: African Americans participate in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening less often than whites, while disease onset is younger, and incidence and mortality from CRC are higher.
METHODS: POC items for CRC screening were administered to 158 African Americans, the majority of whom were female (75.9%) and were not employed (85.4%). Confirmatory factor analysis was used to validate four factors reflecting the POC sub-domains.
RESULTS: Support of the factor validity of the POC with internal consistency of standardized alpha for the four factors was found. A logistic regression showed predictive validity in predicting current screening stage for two of the four sub-domains.
CONCLUSION: These data support the application of the POC to prediction of CRC screening intention among African Americans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21165726      PMCID: PMC3626411          DOI: 10.1007/s12160-010-9250-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  29 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  D K Rex; D A Johnson; D A Lieberman; R W Burt; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance and stage of adoption among siblings of individuals with early onset colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Arnold Markowitz; Sidney Winawer; Neal J Meropol; Daniel Haller; William Rakowski; James Babb; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 3.  Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; C C DiClemente
Journal:  Prog Behav Modif       Date:  1992

4.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Elizabeth Ward; Betsy A Kohler; Christie Eheman; Ann G Zauber; Robert N Anderson; Ahmedin Jemal; Maria J Schymura; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Laura C Seeff; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; S Luuk Goede; Lynn A G Ries
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; C C DiClemente
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1983-06

7.  One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; D G Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  G A Brenes; E D Paskett
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Understanding factors related to Colorectal Cancer (CRC) screening among urban Hispanics: use of focus group methodology.

Authors:  Alejandro Varela; Lina Jandorf; Katherine Duhamel
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Increasing attendance at colorectal cancer screening: testing the efficacy of a mailed, psychoeducational intervention in a community sample of older adults.

Authors:  Jane Wardle; Sara Williamson; Kirsten McCaffery; Stephen Sutton; Tamara Taylor; Robert Edwards; Wendy Atkin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  4 in total

1.  Shared decision-making about colorectal cancer screening: a conceptual framework to guide research.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-02-15

2.  Processes of Change for Colonoscopy: Limited Support for Use Among Navigated Latinos.

Authors:  Gina Cotter; Katherine DuHamel; Elizabeth Schofield; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2018-10-09

3.  The influence of gender on colorectal cancer knowledge, screening intention, perceived risk and worry among African Americans in South Florida.

Authors:  Sheila Y McKinney; Richard C Palmer
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-04

4.  Examining intrafamilial communication of colorectal cancer risk status to family members and kin responses to colonoscopy: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kaitlin M McGarragle; Crystal Hare; Spring Holter; Dorian Anglin Facey; Kelly McShane; Steven Gallinger; Tae L Hart
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.857

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.