INTRODUCTION: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is increasingly employed in the quantitative analysis and quality control (QC) of natural products (NP) including botanical dietary supplements (BDS). The establishment of QC protocols based on quantitative (1) H NMR (qHNMR) requires method validation. OBJECTIVE: Develop and validate a generic qHNMR method. Optimize acquisition and processing parameters, with specific attention to the requirements for the analysis of complex NP samples, including botanicals and purity assessment of NP isolates. METHODS: In order to establish the validated qHNMR method, samples containing two highly pure reference materials were used. The influence of acquisition and processing parameters on the method validation was examined, and general aspects of method validation of qHNMR methods discussed. Subsequently, the method established was applied to the analysis of two NP samples: a purified reference compound and a crude mixture. RESULTS: The accuracy and precision of qHNMR using internal or external calibration were compared, using a validated method suitable for complex samples. The impact of post-acquisition processing on method validation was examined using three software packages: TopSpin, Mnova and NUTS. The dynamic range of the qHNMR method developed was 5000:1 with a limit of detection (LOD) of better than 10 µm. The limit of quantification (LOQ) depends on the desired level of accuracy and experiment time spent. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that acquisition parameters, processing parameters and processing software all contribute to qHNMR method validation. A validated method with a high dynamic range and general workflow for qHNMR analysis of NP is proposed.
INTRODUCTION: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is increasingly employed in the quantitative analysis and quality control (QC) of natural products (NP) including botanical dietary supplements (BDS). The establishment of QC protocols based on quantitative (1) H NMR (qHNMR) requires method validation. OBJECTIVE: Develop and validate a generic qHNMR method. Optimize acquisition and processing parameters, with specific attention to the requirements for the analysis of complex NP samples, including botanicals and purity assessment of NP isolates. METHODS: In order to establish the validated qHNMR method, samples containing two highly pure reference materials were used. The influence of acquisition and processing parameters on the method validation was examined, and general aspects of method validation of qHNMR methods discussed. Subsequently, the method established was applied to the analysis of two NP samples: a purified reference compound and a crude mixture. RESULTS: The accuracy and precision of qHNMR using internal or external calibration were compared, using a validated method suitable for complex samples. The impact of post-acquisition processing on method validation was examined using three software packages: TopSpin, Mnova and NUTS. The dynamic range of the qHNMR method developed was 5000:1 with a limit of detection (LOD) of better than 10 µm. The limit of quantification (LOQ) depends on the desired level of accuracy and experiment time spent. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that acquisition parameters, processing parameters and processing software all contribute to qHNMR method validation. A validated method with a high dynamic range and general workflow for qHNMR analysis of NP is proposed.
Authors: Frank van der Kooy; Federica Maltese; Young Hae Choi; Hye Kyong Kim; Robert Verpoorte Journal: Planta Med Date: 2009-03-13 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Gregory K Pierens; Anthony R Carroll; Rohan A Davis; Meredith E Palframan; Ronald J Quinn Journal: J Nat Prod Date: 2008-04-05 Impact factor: 4.050
Authors: Tanja Gödecke; Ping Yao; José G Napolitano; Dejan Nikolić; Birgit M Dietz; Judy L Bolton; Richard B van Breemen; Norman R Farnsworth; Shao-Nong Chen; David C Lankin; Guido F Pauli Journal: Fitoterapia Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: José G Napolitano; Tanja Gödecke; María F Rodríguez-Brasco; Birgit U Jaki; Shao-Nong Chen; David C Lankin; Guido F Pauli Journal: J Nat Prod Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 4.050
Authors: Yang Yu; Guido F Pauli; Lingyi Huang; Li-She Gan; Richard B van Breemen; Dianpeng Li; James B McAlpine; David C Lankin; Shao-Nong Chen Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Charlotte Simmler; Tristesse Jones; Jeffrey R Anderson; Dejan C Nikolić; Richard B van Breemen; Djaja D Soejarto; Shao-Nong Chen; Guido F Pauli Journal: Phytochem Anal Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 3.373
Authors: Kemal Duric; Yang Liu; Shao-Nong Chen; David C Lankin; Dejan Nikolic; James B McAlpine; J Brent Friesen; Guido F Pauli Journal: J Nat Prod Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 4.050
Authors: Gonzalo R Malca-Garcia; Daniel Zagal; James Graham; Dejan Nikolić; J Brent Friesen; David C Lankin; Shao-Nong Chen; Guido F Pauli Journal: J Ethnopharmacol Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 4.360
Authors: Gonzalo R Malca Garcia; J Brent Friesen; Yang Liu; Dejan Nikolić; David C Lankin; James B McAlpine; Shao-Nong Chen; Guido F Pauli Journal: J Chromatogr A Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 4.759
Authors: José G Napolitano; Tanja Gödecke; David C Lankin; Birgit U Jaki; James B McAlpine; Shao-Nong Chen; Guido F Pauli Journal: J Pharm Biomed Anal Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 3.935
Authors: Ayano Imai; David C Lankin; Dejan Nikolić; Soyoun Ahn; Richard B van Breemen; Norman R Farnsworth; James B McAlpine; Shao-Nong Chen; Guido F Pauli Journal: J Nat Prod Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 4.050