OBJECTIVES: Due to lack of tactile feedback, dissection of surgical planes during delicate procedures of nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) can be hampered more by postbiopsy hematomas or adhesions compared with open surgery. Thus, we investigated association between extent of postbiopsy hemorrhage observed via preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with surgical difficulty of RALRP. METHODS: We reviewed records of 154 men who received prostate biopsy, MR imaging, and subsequently, nerve-sparing RALRP for clinically localized prostate cancer within 2 weeks of MR imaging. We scored degree of postbiopsy hemorrhage as shown on T1-weighted MR imaging (hemorrhage score) and analyzed potential association of hemorrhage score with variables representative of surgical difficulty (operative time, estimated blood loss, and margin positivity) and functional outcomes (urinary continence and erectile function). RESULTS: Among our subjects, total hemorrhage score demonstrated no significant associations with interval from biopsy to MR imaging (p = 0.210). In multivariate analyses, prostate volume and total hemorrhage score were observed to be significantly associated with operative time (p = 0.004 and 0.039, respectively) and estimated blood loss (p = 0.009 and 0.023, respectively). Patients' age and total hemorrhage score was observed to be independent predictor of the return of erectile function sufficient for vaginal intercourse at 6 months following RALRP (p = 0.003 and 0.036, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Degree of postbiopsy hemorrhage observed in preoperative MR imaging may be predictive of surgical difficulty for RALRP. Such findings provide concrete evidences that aftereffects of prostate biopsy have significant impact on performing RALRP.
OBJECTIVES: Due to lack of tactile feedback, dissection of surgical planes during delicate procedures of nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) can be hampered more by postbiopsy hematomas or adhesions compared with open surgery. Thus, we investigated association between extent of postbiopsy hemorrhage observed via preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with surgical difficulty of RALRP. METHODS: We reviewed records of 154 men who received prostate biopsy, MR imaging, and subsequently, nerve-sparing RALRP for clinically localized prostate cancer within 2 weeks of MR imaging. We scored degree of postbiopsy hemorrhage as shown on T1-weighted MR imaging (hemorrhage score) and analyzed potential association of hemorrhage score with variables representative of surgical difficulty (operative time, estimated blood loss, and margin positivity) and functional outcomes (urinary continence and erectile function). RESULTS: Among our subjects, total hemorrhage score demonstrated no significant associations with interval from biopsy to MR imaging (p = 0.210). In multivariate analyses, prostate volume and total hemorrhage score were observed to be significantly associated with operative time (p = 0.004 and 0.039, respectively) and estimated blood loss (p = 0.009 and 0.023, respectively). Patients' age and total hemorrhage score was observed to be independent predictor of the return of erectile function sufficient for vaginal intercourse at 6 months following RALRP (p = 0.003 and 0.036, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Degree of postbiopsy hemorrhage observed in preoperative MR imaging may be predictive of surgical difficulty for RALRP. Such findings provide concrete evidences that aftereffects of prostate biopsy have significant impact on performing RALRP.
Authors: Fergus V Coakley; Steven Eberhardt; David C Wei; Evan S Wasserman; Stefan B J Heinze; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak Journal: Urology Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Aliya Qayyum; Fergus V Coakley; Ying Lu; Jeffrey D Olpin; Louis Wu; Benjamin M Yeh; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Piotr Kozlowski; Silvia D Chang; Edward C Jones; Kenneth W Berean; Henry Chen; S Larry Goldenberg Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Daniel K Lee; Veerasuthpursh Allareddy; Michael A O'donnell; Richard D Williams; Badrinath R Konety Journal: BJU Int Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: S White; H Hricak; R Forstner; J Kurhanewicz; D B Vigneron; C J Zaloudek; J M Weiss; P Narayan; P R Carroll Journal: Radiology Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: George L Martin; Rafael N Nunez; Mitchell D Humphreys; Aaron D Martin; Robert G Ferrigni; Paul E Andrews; Erik P Castle Journal: BJU Int Date: 2009-06-22 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Jong Yeon Lee; In Ho Chang; Young Tae Moon; Kyung Do Kim; Soon Chul Myung; Tae Hyoung Kim; Jong Beum Lee Journal: Korean J Urol Date: 2011-10-19