Literature DB >> 20062999

Significance of postbiopsy hemorrhage observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in performing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Sung Kyu Hong1, Dae Sung Kim, Won Ki Lee, Hongzoo Park, Jeong Kwon Kim, Seung Hwan Doo, Seong Jin Jeong, Cheol Yong Yoon, Seok-Soo Byun, Sung Il Hwang, Hak Jong Lee, Sang Eun Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Due to lack of tactile feedback, dissection of surgical planes during delicate procedures of nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) can be hampered more by postbiopsy hematomas or adhesions compared with open surgery. Thus, we investigated association between extent of postbiopsy hemorrhage observed via preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with surgical difficulty of RALRP.
METHODS: We reviewed records of 154 men who received prostate biopsy, MR imaging, and subsequently, nerve-sparing RALRP for clinically localized prostate cancer within 2 weeks of MR imaging. We scored degree of postbiopsy hemorrhage as shown on T1-weighted MR imaging (hemorrhage score) and analyzed potential association of hemorrhage score with variables representative of surgical difficulty (operative time, estimated blood loss, and margin positivity) and functional outcomes (urinary continence and erectile function).
RESULTS: Among our subjects, total hemorrhage score demonstrated no significant associations with interval from biopsy to MR imaging (p = 0.210). In multivariate analyses, prostate volume and total hemorrhage score were observed to be significantly associated with operative time (p = 0.004 and 0.039, respectively) and estimated blood loss (p = 0.009 and 0.023, respectively). Patients' age and total hemorrhage score was observed to be independent predictor of the return of erectile function sufficient for vaginal intercourse at 6 months following RALRP (p = 0.003 and 0.036, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Degree of postbiopsy hemorrhage observed in preoperative MR imaging may be predictive of surgical difficulty for RALRP. Such findings provide concrete evidences that aftereffects of prostate biopsy have significant impact on performing RALRP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20062999     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0506-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  12 in total

1.  Blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship to morphologic features on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fergus V Coakley; Steven Eberhardt; David C Wei; Evan S Wasserman; Stefan B J Heinze; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-10       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Organ-confined prostate cancer: effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; Fergus V Coakley; Ying Lu; Jeffrey D Olpin; Louis Wu; Benjamin M Yeh; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Combined diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis--correlation with biopsy and histopathology.

Authors:  Piotr Kozlowski; Silvia D Chang; Edward C Jones; Kenneth W Berean; Henry Chen; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Does the interval between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy affect the immediate postoperative outcome?

Authors:  Daniel K Lee; Veerasuthpursh Allareddy; Michael A O'donnell; Richard D Williams; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Prostate cancer: relationships between postbiopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Tamada; Teruki Sone; Yoshimasa Jo; Akira Yamamoto; Takenori Yamashita; Naoto Egashira; Shigeki Imai; Masao Fukunaga
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Current status of MRI for the diagnosis, staging and prognosis of prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy and active surveillance.

Authors:  Arnauld Villers; Laurent Lemaitre; Jérémie Haffner; Philippe Puech
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.309

8.  Prostate cancer: effect of postbiopsy hemorrhage on interpretation of MR images.

Authors:  S White; H Hricak; R Forstner; J Kurhanewicz; D B Vigneron; C J Zaloudek; J M Weiss; P Narayan; P R Carroll
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: effects on perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  George L Martin; Rafael N Nunez; Mitchell D Humphreys; Aaron D Martin; Robert G Ferrigni; Paul E Andrews; Erik P Castle
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Optimal timing of post-biopsy MR imaging of the prostate.

Authors:  S Ikonen; L Kivisaari; T Vehmas; P Tervahartiala; J O Salo; K Taari; S Rannikko
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of Prostate Biopsy Hemorrhage on MRDW and MRS Imaging.

Authors:  Jong Yeon Lee; In Ho Chang; Young Tae Moon; Kyung Do Kim; Soon Chul Myung; Tae Hyoung Kim; Jong Beum Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-10-19

2.  Effects of post biopsy digital rectal compression on improving prostate cancer staging using magnetic resonance imaging in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kyung Kgi Park; Mun Su Chung; Soo Yoon Chung; Joo Hee Kim; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.759

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.