Literature DB >> 11167335

Optimal timing of post-biopsy MR imaging of the prostate.

S Ikonen1, L Kivisaari, T Vehmas, P Tervahartiala, J O Salo, K Taari, S Rannikko.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the quantity and frequency of hemorrhage after prostatic biopsy. As post-biopsy blood products may interfere with interpretation of MR images, we also investigated the optimal timing for MR examination after biopsy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen patients scheduled for prostatic biopsies were imaged with endorectal MR before and after the procedure. In addition, MR studies of 42 patients with prostate cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The amount of post-biopsy blood product and the degree of its interference with image interpretation were assessed.
RESULTS: Of a total of 57 patients, 44 (77%) had visible post-biopsy hemorrhage. However, the presence of blood products were considered to interfere with interpretation of the images in only 12 (21%) cases. This disturbing effect seems to diminish after 21 days from biopsy. The total amount of blood clearly decreased after 28 days.
CONCLUSION: Deferring MR imaging for at least 3 weeks after prostatic biopsy is advisable. T1-weighted images are necessary to rule out false-positive findings caused by post-biopsy hemorrhage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11167335     DOI: 10.1080/028418501127346260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.701


  24 in total

1.  Robotic prostatectomy and access to care: Canadian vs. U.S. experience.

Authors:  Kevin C Zorn; Marc Zanaty; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  Seung Hwan Lee; Kyung Kgi Park; Kyung Hwa Choi; Beom Jin Lim; Joo Hee Kim; Seung Wook Lee; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Linda M Johnson; Baris Turkbey; William D Figg; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Can robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) be performed very soon after biopsy?

Authors:  Jung Ki Jo; Jong Jin Oh; Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Fast T2*-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Rulon L Hardman; Fadi El-Merhi; Adam J Jung; Steve Ware; Ian M Thompson; Harry T Friel; Qi Peng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Does time interval between prostate biopsy and surgery affect outcomes of radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Li; Qing Jiang; Qiubo Li; Yuanfeng Zhang; Liang Gao
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  Implementation of Multi-parametric Prostate MRI in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Andrea S Kierans; Samir S Taneja; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Can 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accurately detect prostate cancer extracapsular extension?

Authors:  Yannick Cerantola; Massimo Valerio; Aida Kawkabani Marchini; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Patrice Jichlinski
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Hou; D Swanson; A B Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-03-17

Review 10.  Value of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Friedrich Aigner; Leo Pallwein; Alexandre Pelzer; Georg Schaefer; Georg Bartsch; Dieter zur Nedden; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.