Literature DB >> 16767709

Combined diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis--correlation with biopsy and histopathology.

Piotr Kozlowski1, Silvia D Chang, Edward C Jones, Kenneth W Berean, Henry Chen, S Larry Goldenberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the combination of diffusion-weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI provides higher diagnostic sensitivity for prostate cancer than each technique alone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer underwent endorectal MRI on a 1.5T scanner prior to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies. The average values of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC, calculated from b-values of 0 and 600), K(trans), v(e), maximum gadolinium (Gd) concentration, onset time, mean gradient, and maximum enhancement were determined. Correlation with histology was based on biopsy (six patients) and prostatectomy specimen (eight patients) results. The Tukey-Kramer test was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The average values of all MRI parameters, except v(e) and maximum Gd concentration, showed significant differences between tumor and normal prostate. The sensitivity and specificity values were respectively 54% (35-72%) and 100% (95-100%) for the ADC data, and 59% (39-77%) and 74% (63-83%) for the DCE data. When both ADC and DCE results were combined, the sensitivity increased to 87% (68-95%) and specificity decreased to 74% (62-83%).
CONCLUSION: All but two DW- and DCE-MRI parameters showed significant differences between tumor and normal prostate. Combining both techniques provides better sensitivity, with a small decrease in specificity. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16767709     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  78 in total

1.  Combined prostate diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI at 3T--quantitative correlation with biopsy.

Authors:  Piotr Kozlowski; Silvia D Chang; Ran Meng; Burkhard Mädler; Robert Bell; Edward C Jones; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Device for sectioning prostatectomy specimens to facilitate comparison between histology and in vivo MRI.

Authors:  Bryn Drew; Edward C Jones; Stefan Reinsberg; Andrew C Yung; S Larry Goldenberg; Piotr Kozlowski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Functional MRI for radiotherapy dose painting.

Authors:  Uulke A van der Heide; Antonetta C Houweling; Greetje Groenendaal; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  In vivo 3T and ex vivo 7T diffusion tensor imaging of prostate cancer: Correlation with histology.

Authors:  Carlos F Uribe; Edward C Jones; Silvia D Chang; S Larry Goldenberg; Stefan A Reinsberg; Piotr Kozlowski
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Multiparametric MRI for the detection of local recurrence of prostate cancer in the setting of biochemical recurrence after low dose rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Luca F Valle; Matthew D Greer; Joanna H Shih; Tristan Barrett; Yan Mee Law; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Haytham Shebel; Akhil Muthigi; Daniel Su; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Andra V Krauze; Aradhana Kaushal; Peter L Choyke; Barış Türkbey; Deborah E Citrin
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in focal therapy for prostate cancer: recommendations from a consensus panel.

Authors:  Berrend G Muller; Jurgen J Fütterer; Rajan T Gupta; Aaron Katz; Alexander Kirkham; John Kurhanewicz; Judd W Moul; Peter A Pinto; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Cary Robertson; Jean de la Rosette; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; J Stephen Jones; Osamu Ukimura; Sadhna Verma; Hessel Wijkstra; Michael Marberger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 7.  Restriction spectrum imaging: An evolving imaging biomarker in prostate MRI.

Authors:  Ryan L Brunsing; Natalie M Schenker-Ahmed; Nathan S White; J Kellogg Parsons; Christopher Kane; Joshua Kuperman; Hauke Bartsch; Andrew Karim Kader; Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Tyler M Seibert; Daniel Margolis; Steven S Raman; Carrie R McDonald; Nikdokht Farid; Santosh Kesari; Donna Hansel; Ahmed Shabaik; Anders M Dale; David S Karow
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  New horizons in prostate cancer imaging.

Authors:  Gregory Ravizzini; Baris Turkbey; Karen Kurdziel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 9.  Saturation biopsies for prostate cancer: current uses and future prospects.

Authors:  Nicolas B Delongchamps; Gabriel P Haas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping and spectroscopy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Kyle Petrowski; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.