Literature DB >> 15385308

Organ-confined prostate cancer: effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging.

Aliya Qayyum1, Fergus V Coakley, Ying Lu, Jeffrey D Olpin, Louis Wu, Benjamin M Yeh, Peter R Carroll, John Kurhanewicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging findings in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging were performed in 43 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy confirming organ-confined disease. For each sextant, two independent reviewers scored the degree of hemorrhage on a scale from 1 to 5 and recorded the presence or absence of capsular irregularity. A spectroscopist recorded the number of spectrally degraded voxels in the peripheral zone. The outcome variables of capsular irregularity and spectral degradation were correlated with the predictor variables of time from biopsy and degree of hemorrhage after biopsy.
RESULTS: Capsular irregularity was unrelated to time from biopsy or to degree of hemorrhage. Spectral degradation was inversely related to time from biopsy (p < 0.01); the mean percentage of degraded peripheral zone voxels was 18.5% within 8 weeks of biopsy compared with 7% after 8 weeks. Spectral degradation was unrelated to the degree of hemorrhage.
CONCLUSION: In organ-confined prostate cancer, capsular irregularity can be seen at any time after biopsy and is independent of the degree of hemorrhage, whereas spectral degradation is seen predominantly in the first 8 weeks after biopsy. MRI staging criteria and guidelines for scheduling studies after biopsy may require appropriate modification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15385308     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.183.4.1831079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  41 in total

1.  Preoperative nomograms incorporating magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Amita Shukla-Dave; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin; Changhong Yu; Kristen L Zakian; Kazuma Udo; Peter T Scardino; James Eastham; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Value of the hemorrhage exclusion sign on T1-weighted prostate MR images for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tristan Barrett; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Debra A Goldman; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter R Carroll; Fergus V Coakley; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

Review 4.  Imaging of prostate cancer with PET/CT using (18)F-Fluorocholine.

Authors:  Reza Vali; Wolfgang Loidl; Christian Pirich; Werner Langesteger; Mohsen Beheshti
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-15

5.  [Imaging diagnostics of the prostate].

Authors:  D J Dinter; A M Weidner; F Wenz; A E Pelzer; M S Michel; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  Seung Hwan Lee; Kyung Kgi Park; Kyung Hwa Choi; Beom Jin Lim; Joo Hee Kim; Seung Wook Lee; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  New horizons in prostate cancer imaging.

Authors:  Gregory Ravizzini; Baris Turkbey; Karen Kurdziel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Hou; D Swanson; A B Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-03-17

Review 9.  Imaging techniques for prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Multidisciplinary functional MR imaging for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeong Kon Kim; Yun-Jin Jang; Gyunggoo Cho
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.