Literature DB >> 20054928

Lumbar disc prosthesis. Surgical technique, indications and clinical results in 22 patients with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.

T David1.   

Abstract

Twenty-two patients with 29 lumbar disc prosthesis have been reviewed clinically and radiologically with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. The first operation in France with the SB Charity model was carried out in January 1989 with the help of the German authors Schellnäck and Büttner. The surgical technique consists of an anterior extraperitoneal approach with the patient in a supine and hyperlordotic position and must be very precise. The indications are very rare. At the moment, we only consider the prosthesis as an alternative to an arthrodesis in young patients with good-quality bone. We limit the indication to cases where fusion in situ is to be avoided: degenerative disease with collapsed disc, failed backs and instability at a maximum of one or two levels. The immediate results are encouraging, and no loosening of the prosthesis or osteolysis at the bone-prosthesis interface has been noticed in patients with 2 or more years follow-up. The segmental mobility still remains in bending and flexion/extension and is demonstrated by dynamic X-rays. Because we do not know the long-term results of implantation of the prosthesis, it must continue to be a rare procedure and the patient must be informed that in case of failure, fusion by a posterior or anterior approach may be necessary and is always possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 20054928     DOI: 10.1007/bf00298370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  7 in total

1.  Isolated lumbar disk resorption as a cause of nerve root canal stenosis.

Authors:  H V Crock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Biomechanics of the SB Charité lumbar intervertebral disc endoprosthesis.

Authors:  K Büttner-Janz; K Schellnack; H Zippel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Lumbar arthrodesis: results after more than 10 years].

Authors:  J Cauchoix; T David
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1985

4.  Posterolateral lumbar-spine fusion. Analysis of Mayo Clinic series.

Authors:  R N Stauffer; M B Coventry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  [Proceedings: Intervertebral disk displacement].

Authors:  S Hoffmann-Daimler
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1974-08

6.  [Logical plan for an intervertebral disk prosthesis. Biomechanical conditions and biomaterials required].

Authors:  H G Edeland
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.500

7.  [An alternative treatment strategy in lumbar intervertebral disk damage using an SB Charité modular type intervertebral disk endoprosthesis].

Authors:  K Büttner-Janz; K Schellnack; H Zippel
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb
  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Charité total disc replacement--clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years.

Authors:  Michael Putzier; Julia F Funk; Sascha V Schneider; Christian Gross; Stephan W Tohtz; Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann; Carsten Perka; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Methodological aspects of outcomes research.

Authors:  Rudi Hiebert; Margareta Nordin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Revision surgery after implantation of a vertebral disc prosthesis].

Authors:  C Hopf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Resect or not to resect: the role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Werner Schmoelz; René Schmidt; Heiko Reichel; Hans Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Complications and Rates of Subsequent Lumbar Surgery Following Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty and Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Claire D Eliasberg; Michael P Kelly; Remi M Ajiboye; Nelson F SooHoo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement.

Authors:  C Tournier; S Aunoble; J C Le Huec; J P Lemaire; P Tropiano; V Lafage; W Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison of single-level L4-L5 versus L5-S1 lumbar disc replacement: results and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Riccardo Sinigaglia; Albert Bundy; Sandro Costantini; Ugo Nena; Francesco Finocchiaro; Daniele A Fabris Monterumici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Two-level total lumbar disc replacement.

Authors:  Mario Di Silvestre; Georgios Bakaloudis; Francesco Lolli; Francesco Vommaro; Patrizio Parisini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Analysis of post-operative pain patterns following total lumbar disc replacement: results from fluoroscopically guided spine infiltrations.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Andreas Korge; Frank Grochulla; Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.