Literature DB >> 28654964

Evidence for unlimited capacity processing of simple features in visual cortex.

Alex L White1, Erik Runeson2, John Palmer3, Zachary R Ernst4, Geoffrey M Boynton5.   

Abstract

Performance in many visual tasks is impaired when observers attempt to divide spatial attention across multiple visual field locations. Correspondingly, neuronal response magnitudes in visual cortex are often reduced during divided compared with focused spatial attention. This suggests that early visual cortex is the site of capacity limits, where finite processing resources must be divided among attended stimuli. However, behavioral research demonstrates that not all visual tasks suffer such capacity limits: The costs of divided attention are minimal when the task and stimulus are simple, such as when searching for a target defined by orientation or contrast. To date, however, every neuroimaging study of divided attention has used more complex tasks and found large reductions in response magnitude. We bridged that gap by using functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure responses in the human visual cortex during simple feature detection. The first experiment used a visual search task: Observers detected a low-contrast Gabor patch within one or four potentially relevant locations. The second experiment used a dual-task design, in which observers made independent judgments of Gabor presence in patches of dynamic noise at two locations. In both experiments, blood-oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals in the retinotopic cortex were significantly lower for ignored than attended stimuli. However, when observers divided attention between multiple stimuli, BOLD signals were not reliably reduced and behavioral performance was unimpaired. These results suggest that processing of simple features in early visual cortex has unlimited capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28654964      PMCID: PMC5488877          DOI: 10.1167/17.6.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  64 in total

1.  The psychophysics of visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; P Verghese; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Jonathan Gill; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Statistical decision theory to relate neurons to behavior in the study of covert visual attention.

Authors:  Miguel P Eckstein; Matthew F Peterson; Binh T Pham; Jason A Droll
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Using a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of selective attention.

Authors:  John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The retinotopy of visual spatial attention.

Authors:  R B Tootell; N Hadjikhani; E K Hall; S Marrett; W Vanduffel; J T Vaughan; A M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Graded Neuronal Modulations Related to Visual Spatial Attention.

Authors:  J Patrick Mayo; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neural mechanisms of human perceptual choice under focused and divided attention.

Authors:  Valentin Wyart; Nicholas E Myers; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Competition in visual cortex impedes attention to multiple items.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Diane M Beck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The attentional effects of single cues and color singletons on visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Alex L White; Rasmus Lunau; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition.

Authors:  Alex L White; John Palmer; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-05-07

2.  Parallel spatial channels converge at a bottleneck in anterior word-selective cortex.

Authors:  Alex L White; John Palmer; Geoffrey M Boynton; Jason D Yeatman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Efficient allocation of attentional sensitivity gain in visual cortex reduces foveal sensitivity in visual search.

Authors:  R Calen Walshe; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Pupillary dilation elicited by attending to two disks with different luminance.

Authors:  Xiaofei Hu; Rumi Hisakata; Hirohiko Kaneko
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Is there a serial bottleneck in visual object recognition?

Authors:  Dina V Popovkina; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  A major role for retrieval and/or comparison in the set-size effects of change detection.

Authors:  James C Moreland; John Palmer; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The cost of divided attention for detection of simple visual features primarily reflects limits in post-perceptual processing.

Authors:  Amelia H Harrison; Sam Ling; Joshua J Foster
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.157

9.  Visual word recognition: Evidence for a serial bottleneck in lexical access.

Authors:  Alex L White; John Palmer; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.