Literature DB >> 200527

Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Heterozygous effect of polygenic mutations.

O Ohnishi.   

Abstract

Spontaneous and EMS-induced mutations were accumulated for several generations on the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster by keeping this chromosome heterozygous under conditions of minimal natural selection. This article reports studies of heterozygous effects of these mutants.--Both lethal and mildly deleterious mutants have a deleterious heterozygous effect. There was no discernible difference between heterozygotes in which all the mutants were on one chromosome and those where the mutants were distributed over both homologs; thus the coupling-repulsion effect of MUKAI and YAMAZAKI (1964, 1968) is not confirmed. The spontaneous polygenic mutants have a dominance of 0.4 to 0.5, and the same value is found at very low EMS doses. However, the value at higher EMS doses is only about half as high. Since the low doses have a large fraction of spontaneous mutants, the dominance of EMS mutants is less, in the range 0.1 to 0.3, but still larger than for lethals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 200527      PMCID: PMC1213760     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  6 in total

1.  THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. II. OVERDOMINANCE OF SPONTANEOUS MUTANT POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY IN HOMOZYGOUS GENETIC BACKGROUND.

Authors:  T MUKAI; S CHIGUSA; I YOSHIKAWA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A Comparison of the Effect of Lethal and Detrimental Chromosomes from Drosophila Populations.

Authors:  R Greenberg; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1960-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Our load of mutations.

Authors:  H J MULLER
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1950-06       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Mukai; S I Chigusa; L E Mettler; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Viability mutations induced by ethyl methanesulfonate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Mukai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Heterozygous effects of x-ray induced mutations on viability of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Maruyama; J F Crow
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 2.433

  6 in total
  12 in total

1.  Dominance of mutations affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  James D Fry; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Gene action of new mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Ruth G Shaw; Shu-Mei Chang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Pleiotropic Effects on Fitness of Mutations Affecting Viability in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  M J Simmons; C R Preston; W R Engels
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Inferences about the distribution of dominance drawn from yeast gene knockout data.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Fitness landscapes: an alternative theory for the dominance of mutation.

Authors:  Federico Manna; Guillaume Martin; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  EMS-induced polygenic mutation rates for nine quantitative characters in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P D Keightley; O Ohnishi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Comparing mutational variabilities.

Authors:  D Houle; B Morikawa; M Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Purging deleterious mutations in conservation programmes: combining optimal contributions with inbred matings.

Authors:  M Á R de Cara; B Villanueva; M Á Toro; J Fernández
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in bacteriophage f1.

Authors:  Joan B Peris; Paulina Davis; José M Cuevas; Miguel R Nebot; Rafael Sanjuán
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Presynaptic calcium channel localization and calcium-dependent synaptic vesicle exocytosis regulated by the Fuseless protein.

Authors:  A Ashleigh Long; Eunju Kim; Hung-Tat Leung; Elvin Woodruff; Lingling An; R W Doerge; William L Pak; Kendal Broadie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.