Literature DB >> 20046659

Analysis of studies that compare the dose accuracy of prefilled insulin pens.

Daniel Crowe1.   

Abstract

Multiple industry-sponsored studies have been published about the accuracy of insulin delivery using prefilled insulin pens. Although the study by Weise and colleagues in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology found that the Novo Nordisk device was slightly more accurate than the Sanofi-Aventis device, one can anticipate a Sanofi-Aventis-funded study that may find the opposite, because no internationally acceptable, publicly funded, unbiased scientific organization exists to perform head-to-head comparisons of drugs and devices in an evidence-based manner. Currently, clinicians are left on their own to determine whether a study on this topic was conducted in an accurate, unbiased manner. A fundamental redesign of clinical research could reinvigorate and revolutionize the process by which innovations travel from the bench to the bedside. As we anticipate changes in healthcare in the future, it is imperative that the approval and postmarketing surveillance process is revised to support the practice of true evidence-based medicine. © Diabetes Technology Society

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias; clinical trials; diabetes; industry studies; insulin pens

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20046659      PMCID: PMC2769859          DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  10 in total

1.  Natural selection. Weaker hospitals find today's climate is a jungle.

Authors:  D Bellandi
Journal:  Mod Healthc       Date:  2000-02-07

2.  The continued need for independent research on prescription drugs.

Authors:  John F Hoadley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Clinical research in the United States at a crossroads: proposal for a novel public-private partnership to establish a national clinical research enterprise.

Authors:  William F Crowley; Louis Sherwood; Patricia Salber; David Scheinberg; Hal Slavkin; Hugh Tilson; E Albert Reece; Veronica Catanese; Stephen B Johnson; Adrian Dobs; Myron Genel; Allan Korn; Nancy Reame; Robert Bonow; Jack Grebb; David Rimoin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A proposal for radical changes in the drug-approval process.

Authors:  Alastair J J Wood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Ethics and constitutional government.

Authors:  James A Albright
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2007

6.  Comparison of the dose accuracy of prefilled insulin pens.

Authors:  Alexander Weise; Johannes W Pfützner; Julia Borig; Anna M Pfützner; Michael Safinowski; Heike Hänel; Petra B Musholt; Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01

7.  Differences in the dose accuracy of insulin pens.

Authors:  Heike Hänel; Alexander Weise; Wei Sun; Johannes W Pfützner; Nicole Thomé; Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

8.  United States patient preference and usability for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus other disposable pens.

Authors:  Jerome S Fischer; Steven V Edelman; Sherwyn L Schwartz
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

9.  Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.

Authors:  Nancy S Sung; William F Crowley; Myron Genel; Patricia Salber; Lewis Sandy; Louis M Sherwood; Stephen B Johnson; Veronica Catanese; Hugh Tilson; Kenneth Getz; Elaine L Larson; David Scheinberg; E Albert Reece; Harold Slavkin; Adrian Dobs; Jack Grebb; Rick A Martinez; Allan Korn; David Rimoin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Who is responsible for evaluating the safety and effectiveness of medical devices? The role of independent technology assessment.

Authors:  Mitchell D Feldman; Amy J Petersen; Leah S Karliner; Jeffrey A Tice
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.128

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.