Literature DB >> 19885306

United States patient preference and usability for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus other disposable pens.

Jerome S Fischer1, Steven V Edelman, Sherwyn L Schwartz.   

Abstract

The uptake of insulin pen use has been slow in the United States, despite their advantages over the vial/ syringe. We present results of a United States subset of 150 patients with type 1/type 2 diabetes, who were enrolled in an open-label study, that assessed usability, pen features, and patient preferences for four prefilled insulin pens: SoloSTAR, FlexPen, Lilly disposable pen, and a prototype, Pen X. Overall, the SoloSTAR and FlexPen were more user-friendly; 95 and 88% of patients, respectively, completed the steps correctly (without safety/attach-needle step-deemed independent of device) versus the Lilly disposable pen (60%) and Pen X (61%; all p < 0.05). The SoloSTAR was rated highest most frequently for pen feature comparisons. Results suggest that the SoloSTAR and FlexPen could potentially facilitate insulin use in the United States.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FlexPen; Lilly disposable pen; SoloSTAR; United States; disposable pen; insulin device

Year:  2008        PMID: 19885306      PMCID: PMC2769811          DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  15 in total

1.  Insulin administration.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Hypoglycaemia in elderly diabetic patients.

Authors:  V Lassmann-Vague
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.041

3.  A comparison of the use of premixed insulins in pen-injectors with conventional patient-mixed insulin treatment in children and adolescents with IDDM. Is there a decreased risk of night hypoglycemia?

Authors:  I Arslanoğlu; N Saka; R Bundak; H Günöz; F Darendeliler
Journal:  J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.634

4.  Patient and physician satisfaction with the Humulin/Humalog Pen, a new 3.0-mL prefilled pen device for insulin delivery.

Authors:  N J Bohannon; J P Ohannesian; A L Burdan; J H Holcombe; A Zagar
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.393

5.  Preference for insulin delivery systems among current insulin users and nonusers.

Authors:  Kent H Summers; Sheryl L Szeinbach; Sheila M Lenox
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  A comparison of insulin pen use in the United States and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Sara Da Costa; Betty Brackenridge; Debbie Hicks
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.140

7.  Assessment of quality of treatment in insulin-treated patients with diabetes using a pre-filled insulin pen. The ORBITER Study Group.

Authors:  Stefano Albano
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2004-04

8.  Effect on quality of life with a new insulin injection device in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus type 2.

Authors:  D A de Luis; R Aller; L Cuellar; M C Terroba; H F Ovalle; O Izaola; E Romero
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.852

9.  Preference and resource utilization in elderly patients: InnoLet versus vial/syringe.

Authors:  John Shelmet; Sherwyn Schwartz; John Cappleman; Gregory Peterson; Soren Skovlund; Lene Lytzen; Lars Nicklasson; John Liang; William Lyness
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.602

10.  A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Mary Korytkowski; David Bell; Carol Jacobsen; Rudee Suwannasari
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.393

View more
  10 in total

1.  Patients' Preferences for Insulin Injection Devices.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-01-09

2.  Analysis of studies that compare the dose accuracy of prefilled insulin pens.

Authors:  Daniel Crowe
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01

3.  Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction After Using Prefilled Insulin Pen in Real Life in Lithuania.

Authors:  Lina Radzevičienė; Daiva Asta Apanavičienė
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-20

4.  Different extent of hypoxic-ischemic brain damage in newborn rats: histopathology, hemodynamic, virtual touch tissue quantification and neurobehavioral observation.

Authors:  Si-Da Wang; Shu-Yuan Liang; Xin-Hong Liao; Xiang-Fa Deng; Yuan-Yuan Chen; Chun-Yan Liao; Lei Wang; Shi Tang; Zhi-Xian Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-10-01

5.  Injection force of reusable insulin pens: Novopen 4, Lilly Luxura, Berlipen, and ClikSTAR.

Authors:  Arnd Friedrichs; Volker Korger; Steffen Adler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 6.  Practical aspects of insulin pen devices.

Authors:  Teresa L Pearson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

7.  Comparative Assessment of Lixisenatide, Exenatide, and Liraglutide Pen Devices: A Pilot User-Based Study.

Authors:  Udo Stauder; Diplom Enginee; Hina Elton; Alfred Penfornis; Steve Edelman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-01

8.  Predictor variables and an equation for estimating HbA1c attainable by initiation of basal supported oral therapy.

Authors:  Naotaka Fujita; Satoru Tsujii; Hirohito Kuwata; Rie Kurokawa; Satoshi Matsunaga; Shintaro Okamura; Tsuyoshi Mashitani; Miyuki Furuya; Masako Kitatani; Hitoshi Ishii
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.232

9.  Evaluation of a Novel Wellness Assessment Device (Preventiometer): A Feasibility Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sanjeev Nanda; Saswati Mahapatra; Stephanie A Lindeen; Joleen L Bernau; Susanne M Cutshall; Bernd Schierwater; Tony Y Chon; Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler; Brent A Bauer
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2019-10-09

Review 10.  Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy Expert Recommendations, India: The Indian Recommendations for Best Practice in Insulin Injection Technique, 2017.

Authors:  Nikhil Tandon; Sanjay Kalra; Yatan Pal Singh Balhara; Manash P Baruah; Manoj Chadha; Hemraj B Chandalia; K M Prasanna Kumar; S V Madhu; Ambrish Mithal; Rakesh Sahay; Rishi Shukla; Annamalai Sundaram; Ambika G Unnikrishnan; Banshi Saboo; Vandita Gupta; Subhankar Chowdhury; Jothydev Kesavadev; Subhash K Wangnoo
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.