Literature DB >> 20045791

Use of pegfilgrastim support on day 9 to maintain relative dose intensity of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients receiving a day 1 and 8 CMF regimen.

Rodolfo Mattioli1, Cesare Gridelli, Javier Castellanos, Antonio Duque, Alfredo Falcone, Mauro Mansutti, Pam Bacon, Sue Lawrinson, Tomas Skacel, Ana Casas.   

Abstract

AIM: In several commonly used regimens, chemotherapy doses are split across different days of the cycle. We aimed to determine the feasibility of growth factor support with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim in this setting.
METHODS: This phase II study in breast cancer patients assessed the utility of a single 6 mg subcutaneous dose of pegfilgrastim administered on day 9 of an intravenous (IV) "split" CMF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) chemotherapy regimen administered on days 1 and 8 and repeated every 28 days for 6 cycles.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, with 49 completing the study. For the primary endpoint, 48 patients (83%) received >or=85% of the relative dose intensity (RDI) of chemotherapy over all 6 cycles (95% confidence interval [CI], 71-91%). Across all chemotherapy cycles, 41 patients (71%) received all scheduled cycles on time and most patients (n=49, 84%) received >or=85% of the planned dose of all chemotherapy agents in all cycles. In total, 295/319 cycles (92%) were delivered on schedule and >or=85% of the planned dose of all chemotherapy agents were administered in 309/319 cycles (97%). Febrile neutropenia was reported in only 2 patients (3%). There were no grade 4 adverse events related to pegfilgrastim. DISCUSSION: Day 9 pegfilgrastim administration was well tolerated and provided effective protection against neutropenia in patients receiving IV CMF on days 1 and 8, allowing chemotherapy to be delivered on time and at the scheduled dose in most patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20045791     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-009-0453-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  16 in total

1.  Severe myelosuppression resulting from concurrent administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  N J Meropol; L L Miller; E L Korn; L E Braitman; M L MacDermott; L M Schuchter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-08-05       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphomas and solid tumours.

Authors:  M S Aapro; D A Cameron; R Pettengell; J Bohlius; J Crawford; M Ellis; N Kearney; G H Lyman; V C Tjan-Heijnen; J Walewski; D C Weber; C Zielinski
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Authors:  M D Green; H Koelbl; J Baselga; A Galid; V Guillem; P Gascon; S Siena; R I Lalisang; H Samonigg; M R Clemens; V Zani; B C Liang; J Renwick; M J Piccart
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer.

Authors:  F A Holmes; J A O'Shaughnessy; S Vukelja; S E Jones; J Shogan; M Savin; J Glaspy; M Moore; L Meza; I Wiznitzer; T A Neumann; L R Hill; B C Liang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A combined analysis of two pivotal randomized trials of a single dose of pegfilgrastim per chemotherapy cycle and daily Filgrastim in patients with stage II-IV breast cancer.

Authors:  Salvatore Siena; Martine J Piccart; Frankie A Holmes; John Glaspy; James Hackett; Jennifer J Renwick
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Delivering adjuvant chemotherapy to women with early-stage breast carcinoma: current patterns of care.

Authors:  B K Link; G T Budd; S Scott; E Dickman; D Paul; G Lawless; M W Lee; M Fridman; J Ford; W B Carter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa; A Moliterni; M Zambetti; C Brambilla
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of high doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with solid tumors.

Authors:  E K Rowinsky; L B Grochow; S E Sartorius; M K Bowling; S H Kaufmann; D Peereboom; R C Donehower
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor reduces the infectious complications of cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  V Trillet-Lenoir; J Green; C Manegold; J Von Pawel; U Gatzemeier; B Lebeau; A Depierre; P Johnson; G Decoster; D Tomita
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  A phase II trial of carboplatin/vinorelbine with pegfilgrastim support for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Richard F Riedel; Carolyn Andrews; Jennifer Garst; Frank Dunphy; James E Herndon; Susan Blackwell; Sally Barbour; Jeffrey Crawford
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 15.609

View more
  4 in total

1.  Uptake of novel medical therapies in the general population.

Authors:  C M Booth; B Rapoport
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Prophylactic long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) in gynecologic malignancies: an oncologic expert statement.

Authors:  Edgar Petru; Christian F Singer; Stephan Polterauer; Arik Galid; Christian Schauer; Johann Klocker; Michael Seifert; Alexander Reinthaller; Christoph Benedicic; Michael Hubalek; Lukas Hefler; Christian Marth; Tonja Scholl-Firon; Gerhard Bogner; Alain-Gustave Zeimet
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2015-10-15

3.  Risk factors for bone pain among patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim.

Authors:  H Xu; Q Gong; F D Vogl; M Reiner; J H Page
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Refining the role of pegfilgrastim (a long-acting G-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: consensus guidance recommendations.

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Ralph Boccia; Robert Leonard; Carlos Camps; Mario Campone; Sylvain Choquet; Marco Danova; John Glaspy; Iwona Hus; Hartmut Link; Thamer Sliwa; Hans Tesch; Vicente Valero
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.