AIM: In several commonly used regimens, chemotherapy doses are split across different days of the cycle. We aimed to determine the feasibility of growth factor support with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim in this setting. METHODS: This phase II study in breast cancer patients assessed the utility of a single 6 mg subcutaneous dose of pegfilgrastim administered on day 9 of an intravenous (IV) "split" CMF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) chemotherapy regimen administered on days 1 and 8 and repeated every 28 days for 6 cycles. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, with 49 completing the study. For the primary endpoint, 48 patients (83%) received >or=85% of the relative dose intensity (RDI) of chemotherapy over all 6 cycles (95% confidence interval [CI], 71-91%). Across all chemotherapy cycles, 41 patients (71%) received all scheduled cycles on time and most patients (n=49, 84%) received >or=85% of the planned dose of all chemotherapy agents in all cycles. In total, 295/319 cycles (92%) were delivered on schedule and >or=85% of the planned dose of all chemotherapy agents were administered in 309/319 cycles (97%). Febrile neutropenia was reported in only 2 patients (3%). There were no grade 4 adverse events related to pegfilgrastim. DISCUSSION: Day 9 pegfilgrastim administration was well tolerated and provided effective protection against neutropenia in patients receiving IV CMF on days 1 and 8, allowing chemotherapy to be delivered on time and at the scheduled dose in most patients.
AIM: In several commonly used regimens, chemotherapy doses are split across different days of the cycle. We aimed to determine the feasibility of growth factor support with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim in this setting. METHODS: This phase II study in breast cancerpatients assessed the utility of a single 6 mg subcutaneous dose of pegfilgrastim administered on day 9 of an intravenous (IV) "split" CMF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) chemotherapy regimen administered on days 1 and 8 and repeated every 28 days for 6 cycles. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, with 49 completing the study. For the primary endpoint, 48 patients (83%) received >or=85% of the relative dose intensity (RDI) of chemotherapy over all 6 cycles (95% confidence interval [CI], 71-91%). Across all chemotherapy cycles, 41 patients (71%) received all scheduled cycles on time and most patients (n=49, 84%) received >or=85% of the planned dose of all chemotherapy agents in all cycles. In total, 295/319 cycles (92%) were delivered on schedule and >or=85% of the planned dose of all chemotherapy agents were administered in 309/319 cycles (97%). Febrile neutropenia was reported in only 2 patients (3%). There were no grade 4 adverse events related to pegfilgrastim. DISCUSSION: Day 9 pegfilgrastim administration was well tolerated and provided effective protection against neutropenia in patients receiving IV CMF on days 1 and 8, allowing chemotherapy to be delivered on time and at the scheduled dose in most patients.
Authors: N J Meropol; L L Miller; E L Korn; L E Braitman; M L MacDermott; L M Schuchter Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1992-08-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: M S Aapro; D A Cameron; R Pettengell; J Bohlius; J Crawford; M Ellis; N Kearney; G H Lyman; V C Tjan-Heijnen; J Walewski; D C Weber; C Zielinski Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: M D Green; H Koelbl; J Baselga; A Galid; V Guillem; P Gascon; S Siena; R I Lalisang; H Samonigg; M R Clemens; V Zani; B C Liang; J Renwick; M J Piccart Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: F A Holmes; J A O'Shaughnessy; S Vukelja; S E Jones; J Shogan; M Savin; J Glaspy; M Moore; L Meza; I Wiznitzer; T A Neumann; L R Hill; B C Liang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: B K Link; G T Budd; S Scott; E Dickman; D Paul; G Lawless; M W Lee; M Fridman; J Ford; W B Carter Journal: Cancer Date: 2001-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: E K Rowinsky; L B Grochow; S E Sartorius; M K Bowling; S H Kaufmann; D Peereboom; R C Donehower Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: V Trillet-Lenoir; J Green; C Manegold; J Von Pawel; U Gatzemeier; B Lebeau; A Depierre; P Johnson; G Decoster; D Tomita Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1993 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Richard F Riedel; Carolyn Andrews; Jennifer Garst; Frank Dunphy; James E Herndon; Susan Blackwell; Sally Barbour; Jeffrey Crawford Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Edgar Petru; Christian F Singer; Stephan Polterauer; Arik Galid; Christian Schauer; Johann Klocker; Michael Seifert; Alexander Reinthaller; Christoph Benedicic; Michael Hubalek; Lukas Hefler; Christian Marth; Tonja Scholl-Firon; Gerhard Bogner; Alain-Gustave Zeimet Journal: Wien Med Wochenschr Date: 2015-10-15
Authors: Matti Aapro; Ralph Boccia; Robert Leonard; Carlos Camps; Mario Campone; Sylvain Choquet; Marco Danova; John Glaspy; Iwona Hus; Hartmut Link; Thamer Sliwa; Hans Tesch; Vicente Valero Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 3.603