Literature DB >> 8648378

Phase I and pharmacologic study of high doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with solid tumors.

E K Rowinsky1, L B Grochow, S E Sartorius, M K Bowling, S H Kaufmann, D Peereboom, R C Donehower.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of escalating doses of the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors and to study whether G-CSF scheduling variably affects the ability to escalate TPT doses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients received 121 courses of TPT as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks at doses that ranged from 2.0 to 4.2 mg/m2/d. G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC) was initiated concurrently with TPT (starting on day 1). Because the concurrent administration of TPT and G-CSF resulted in severe myelosuppression at the lowest TPT dose level, an alternate posttreatment G-CSF schedule in which G-CSF dosing began after TPT (starting on day 6) was subsequently evaluated. Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacologic behavior of high-dose TPT and to determine whether G-CSF altered the pharmacokinetic profile of TPT.
RESULTS: Severe myelosuppression precluded the administration of TPT at the first dose, 2.0 mg/m2/d, with G-CSF on the concurrent schedule. However, dose escalation of TPT with G-CSF on a posttreatment schedule proceeded to 4.2 mg/m2/d. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. One partial response was noted in a patient with colorectal carcinoma refractory to fluoropyrimidines. Pharmacokinetics were linear within the dosing range of 2.0 to 3.5 mg/m2/d, but TPT clearance was lower at the 4.2-mg/m2/d dose level. At 3.5 mg/m2/d, which is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for subsequent-phase studies of TPT with G-CSF, the area under the concentration-versus-time curves (AUCs) for total TPT and lactone averaged 2.2- and 2.3-fold higher, respectively, than the AUCs achieved at the lowest TPT dose, 2.0 mg/m2/d. The pharmacologic behavior of high-dose TPT was not significantly altered by the scheduling of G-CSF.
CONCLUSION: G-CSF administered after 5 daily 30-minute infusions of TPT permits a 2.3-fold dose escalation of TPT above the MTD in solid-tumor patients, whereas concurrent therapy with G-CSF and TPT results in severe myelosuppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8648378     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.4.1224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  8 in total

1.  A phase II trial of 9-aminocaptothecin (9-AC) as a 120-h infusion in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  E E Vokes; G S Gordon; C M Rudin; A M Mauer; S Watson; S Krauss; R Arrieta; H M Golomb; P C Hoffman
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Pegfilgrastim on the Same Day Versus Next Day of Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer, Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results of Four Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Phase II Studies.

Authors:  Howard A Burris; Chandra P Belani; Peter A Kaufman; Alan N Gordon; Lee S Schwartzberg; Warren S Paroly; Seta Shahin; Lyndah Dreiling; Alan Saven
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Effect of concomitant use of G-CSF and myelosuppressive chemotherapy on bone marrow and peripheral granulocytes in a mouse model.

Authors:  Yuki Endo; Takeshi Ishikawa; Kaname Oka; Tomoki Sakakida; Shinya Matsumura; Katsura Mizushima; Toshifumi Doi; Tetsuya Okayama; Kazuhiro Katada; Kazuhiro Kamada; Kazuhiko Uchiyama; Tomohisa Takagi; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Hideyuki Konishi; Yuji Naito; Yoshito Itoh
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Use of pegfilgrastim support on day 9 to maintain relative dose intensity of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients receiving a day 1 and 8 CMF regimen.

Authors:  Rodolfo Mattioli; Cesare Gridelli; Javier Castellanos; Antonio Duque; Alfredo Falcone; Mauro Mansutti; Pam Bacon; Sue Lawrinson; Tomas Skacel; Ana Casas
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Camptothecin and podophyllotoxin derivatives: inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II - mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile.

Authors:  Jörg T Hartmann; Hans-Peter Lipp
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Effectiveness and Safety of Pegfilgrastim in BEP Treatment for Patients with Germ Cell Tumor.

Authors:  Hiroaki Iwamoto; Kouji Izumi; Ariunbold Natsagdorj; Tomoyuki Makino; Takahiro Nohara; Kazuyoshi Shigehara; Yoshifumi Kadono; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Pegfilgrastim Biosimilars in US Supportive Oncology: A Narrative Review of Administration Options and Economic Considerations to Maximize Patient Benefit.

Authors:  Sophia Z Humphreys; Robert B Geller; Paul Walden
Journal:  Oncol Ther       Date:  2022-09-16

8.  Prophylactic pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia among patients receiving biweekly (Q2W) chemotherapy regimens: a systematic review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety.

Authors:  Reshma Mahtani; Jeffrey Crawford; Sinéad M Flannery; Tatiana Lawrence; Jennifer Schenfeld; Prasad L Gawade
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.