Literature DB >> 12488289

A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

M D Green1, H Koelbl, J Baselga, A Galid, V Guillem, P Gascon, S Siena, R I Lalisang, H Samonigg, M R Clemens, V Zani, B C Liang, J Renwick, M J Piccart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of a single fixed 6 mg dose of pegfilgrastim (a pegylated version of filgrastim) per cycle of chemotherapy, compared with daily administration of filgrastim, in the provision of neutrophil support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 157) were randomized to receive either a single 6 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of pegfilgrastim or daily 5 mg/kg s.c. injections of filgrastim, after doxorubicin and docetaxel chemotherapy (60 mg/m(2) and 75 mg/m(2), respectively). Duration of grade 4 neutropenia, depth of neutrophil nadir, incidence of febrile neutropenia, time to neutrophil recovery and safety information were recorded.
RESULTS: A single 6 mg injection of pegfilgrastim was as effective as daily injections of filgrastim for all efficacy measures for all cycles. The mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 was 1.8 and 1.6 days for the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups, respectively. Results for all efficacy end points in cycles 2-4 were consistent with the results from cycle 1. A trend towards a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia was noted across all cycles with pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim (13% versus 20%, respectively). A single fixed dose of pegfilgrastim was as safe and well tolerated as standard daily filgrastim.
CONCLUSIONS: A single fixed dose of pegfilgrastim administered once per cycle of chemotherapy was comparable to multiple daily injections of filgrastim in safely providing neutrophil support during myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Pegfilgrastim may have utility in other clinical settings of neutropenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12488289     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdg019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  142 in total

1.  Usage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor every 2 days is clinically useful and cost-effective for febrile neutropenia during early courses of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Yakushijin; Hisaharu Shikata; Ikue Takaoka; Tamami Horikawa; Kazuhito Takeuchi; Jun Yamanouchi; Taichi Azuma; Hiroshi Narumi; Takaaki Hato; Masaki Yasukawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Phase I trial of infusional cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Abdissa Negassa; Erick Lansigan; Robin Locke; Chamath R De Silva; Peter H Wiernik
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Safety Profile of Biosimilar Filgrastim (Zarzio/Zarxio): A Combined Analysis of Phase III Studies.

Authors:  Nadia Harbeck; Pere Gascón; Andriy Krendyukov; Nadja Hoebel; Sreekanth Gattu; Kimberly Blackwell
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-01-09

4.  Uptake and economic impact of first-cycle colony-stimulating factor use during adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Dawn L Hershman; Elizabeth T Wilde; Jason D Wright; Donna L Buono; Kevin Kalinsky; Jennifer L Malin; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Similar favorable outcome of pegfilgrastim overdose in patients with different age and underlying disease.

Authors:  Carlo Dufour; Barbara Cappelli; Michaela Calvillo; Francesca Fioredda; Rossella Tonelli; Roberto Crocchiolo
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  Neutrophil biology and the next generation of myeloid growth factors.

Authors:  David C Dale
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 7.  Supportive care for patients with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura García-Estévez; Ignasi Tusquets; Isabel Alvarez; César Rodríguez; Yolanda Fernández; Miguel Angel Seguí; Jesús García-Mata; Ana Lluch
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Cost effectiveness of pharmacogenetic testing for uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 before irinotecan administration for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Heather Taffet Gold; Michael J Hall; Victoria Blinder; Bruce R Schackman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The effect of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on oral and periodontal manifestations in a patient with cyclic neutropenia: a case report.

Authors:  Sergio Matarasso; Vincenzo Daniele; Vincenzo Iorio Siciliano; Michele D Mignogna; Gianmaria Andreuccetti; Carlo Cafiero
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-02-18

10.  Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain--results of the LEARN Study.

Authors:  D Almenar; J Mayans; O Juan; J M Garcia Bueno; J I Jalon Lopez; A Frau; M Guinot; P Cerezuela; E Garcia Buscalla; J A Gasquet; J Sanchez
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 2.520

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.