Literature DB >> 20043203

Timeliness and follow-up patterns of cervical cancer detection in a cohort of medically underserved California women.

Farzaneh Tabnak1, Hans-Georg Müller, Jane-Ling Wang, Weihong Zhang, Lydia Pleotis Howell.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study examines factors associated with timely follow-up after Pap test in a program providing cervical cancer detection services to medically underserved California women.
METHODS: Data between 01 January 1992 and 30 June 2007 were analyzed. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify subgroups of women with delayed time to diagnosis or treatment scheduling. The probability of being scheduled for final diagnosis and treatment was assessed using logistic regression analysis. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the women lost to follow up were examined.
RESULTS: Time from screening to final diagnosis scheduling differed according to age group, race/ethnicity, and Pap test result. Race/ethnicity and age were associated with whether treatment was scheduled or not. While loss to follow up among those scheduled for final diagnosis was associated with certain patients' characteristics, no such association was found among those who were scheduled for treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient's demographic characteristics determine the odds of being scheduled for final diagnosis and treatment as well as timeliness of follow-up from screening to final diagnosis. Findings suggest that the dual goal of reducing health disparities and cost-effective detection and treatment of precancerous disease to prevent cervical cancers cannot be achieved without consideration of racial/ethnic differences and needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20043203      PMCID: PMC3382111          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-009-9473-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  17 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Does screening by "Pap" smears help prevent cervical cancer? A case-control study.

Authors:  E A Clarke; T W Anderson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-07-07       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The value of a Pap smear program and suggestions for its implementation.

Authors:  D A Boyes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Determinants of late stage diagnosis of breast and cervical cancer: the impact of age, race, social class, and hospital type.

Authors:  J Mandelblatt; H Andrews; J Kerner; A Zauber; W Burnett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Community-based cancer screening for underserved women: design and baseline findings from the Breast and Cervical Cancer Intervention Study.

Authors:  R A Hiatt; R J Pasick; S Stewart; J Bloom; P Davis; P Gardiner; M Johnston; J Luce; K Schorr; W Brunner; F Stroud
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Cervical cancer control: a study of morbidity and mortality trends over a twenty-one-year period.

Authors:  W M Christopherson; F E Lundin; W M Mendez; J E Parker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Is the promise of cancer-screening programs being compromised? Quality of follow-up care after abnormal screening results.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Kathleen Shakira Washington; Amy Leader; Elizabeth Neilson; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  Processes of care in cervical and breast cancer screening and follow-up--the importance of communication.

Authors:  Jane G Zapka; Elaine Puleo; Stephen H Taplin; Karin Valentine Goins; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Judy Mouchawar; Carol Somkin; M Michele Manos
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Impact of ASC-H terminology on the detection of HSILs in medically underserved California women.

Authors:  Lydia Pleotis Howell; Sunitha Gurusinghe; Farzaneh Tabnak
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.582

10.  Follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears among women of different races.

Authors:  P Carey; D K Gjerdingen
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  11 in total

1.  Determinants of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Follow-Up And Invasive Cervical Cancer Among Uninsured and Underinsured Women in New Jersey.

Authors:  Jennifer Tsui; Adana A Llanos; Michelle Doose; David Rotter; Antoinette Stroup
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2019

2.  Association of Financial Strain With Symptom Burden and Quality of Life for Patients With Lung or Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Lathan; Angel Cronin; Reginald Tucker-Seeley; S Yousuf Zafar; John Z Ayanian; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results.

Authors:  Laurie Elit; Monika Krzyzanowska; Refik Saskin; Lisa Barbera; Asma Razzaq; Aisha Lofters; Naira Yeritsyan; Arlene Bierman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Cervical cancer trends in the United States: a 35-year population-based analysis.

Authors:  Olusola Adegoke; Shalini Kulasingam; Beth Virnig
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Timeliness of cervical cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; William Howe; Janet Royalty; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Multiple barriers delay care among women with abnormal cancer screening despite patient navigation.

Authors:  Ambili Ramachandran; Karen M Freund; Sharon M Bak; Timothy C Heeren; Clara A Chen; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 7.  Disparities in gynecologic cancer incidence, treatment, and survival: a narrative review of outcomes among black and white women in the United States.

Authors:  Mary Towner; J Julie Kim; Melissa A Simon; Daniela Matei; Dario Roque
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.661

8.  Rationale and design of the HOME trial: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of home-based human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling for increasing cervical cancer screening uptake and effectiveness in a U.S. healthcare system.

Authors:  Rachel L Winer; Jasmin A Tiro; Diana L Miglioretti; Chris Thayer; Tara Beatty; John Lin; Hongyuan Gao; Kilian Kimbel; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Follow-up and timeliness after an abnormal cancer screening among underserved, urban women in a patient navigation program.

Authors:  Talar W Markossian; Julie S Darnell; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Timely follow-up of positive cancer screening results: A systematic review and recommendations from the PROSPR Consortium.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Nicole B Gabler; Cosette M Wheeler; Anne Marie McCarthy; Philip E Castle; Ethan A Halm; Mitchell D Schnall; Celette S Skinner; Anna N A Tosteson; Donald L Weaver; Anil Vachani; Shivan J Mehta; Katharine A Rendle; Stacey A Fedewa; Douglas A Corley; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.