Literature DB >> 15207989

Processes of care in cervical and breast cancer screening and follow-up--the importance of communication.

Jane G Zapka1, Elaine Puleo, Stephen H Taplin, Karin Valentine Goins, Marianne Ulcickas Yood, Judy Mouchawar, Carol Somkin, M Michele Manos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given limited research, we investigated patient reports of processes of care related to screening follow-up, timing of result notification, communication issues, and adherence following an abnormal mammogram or Pap test.
METHODS: Women age 50 and over with an abnormal screening mammogram and women age 18 and above with an abnormal Pap test result completed surveys. The mammogram and Pap survey instruments had similar items except pertaining to measures specific to mammography or Pap tests. Bivariate associations between processes of care variables (test results, result receipt, recommendation adherence, receipt of confusing/conflicting information) and global satisfaction were explored using chi-square contingency table analysis. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was conducted.
RESULTS: One thousand one hundred thirty-four women (79.1%) completed the mammogram survey and 1087 women (69.7%) completed the Pap survey. The majority of women received test results quickly. High compliance was reported with recommendations for short-term follow-up. Conflicting/confusing information was reported by a minority of women, but was significantly and positively related to reporting that "care could be better". Patient's lack of understanding about equivocal findings was evident.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that patients need clear messages about recommendations, especially when findings are equivocal and where multiple providers are involved in the process of making clinical decisions. Copyright 2004 The Institute for Cancer Prevention and Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15207989     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  18 in total

1.  Partnering against cancer today: a blueprint for coordinating efforts through communication science.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; Galen E Cole; Barbara D Powe
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013-12

2.  The incidence of hypertension and the follow-up rate in a sample of population over 30 years old in kashan 2013.

Authors:  Mohsen Adib-Hajbaghery; Mohammad-Sajjad Lotfi; Zahra Rezaee-Shahsavarloo; Masoumeh Sadat Mousavi
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2014-09-01

3.  Trust and distrust among Appalachian women regarding cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Jill M Oliveri; Douglas M Post; Paula H Song; Elizabeth Jacobs; Jason Waibel; J Phil Harrop; Kenneth Steinman; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-01

4.  How do breast imaging centers communicate results to women with limited English proficiency and other barriers to care?

Authors:  Erin N Marcus; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Feng Miao; Monica Yepes; Lee Sanders
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

5.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cervical Cancer Education Intervention for Latinas Delivered Through Interactive, Multimedia Kiosks.

Authors:  Armando Valdez; Anna M Napoles; Susan L Stewart; Alvaro Garza
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Multi-level Influences on Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Tor D Tosteson; Julie Weiss; Jennifer S Haas; Martha Goodrich; Roberta DiFlorio; Charles Brackett; Cheryl Clark; Kimberly Harris; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Racial differences in follow-up of abnormal mammography findings among economically disadvantaged women.

Authors:  Swann A Adams; Emily R Smith; James Hardin; Irene Prabhu-Das; Jeanette Fulton; James R Hebert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Gestational Diabetes: Importance of Follow-up Screening for the Benefit of Long-term Health.

Authors:  Sydney M Thayer; Jamie O Lo; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Predictors of risk-based medical follow-up: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Jeanne R Steele; Melanie Wall; Nicholas Salkowski; Pauline Mitby; Toana Kawashima; Mark W Yeazel; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Ann C Mertens
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  The effect of conflicting medication information and physician support on medication adherence for chronically ill patients.

Authors:  Delesha M Carpenter; Robert F DeVellis; Edwin B Fisher; Brenda M DeVellis; Susan L Hogan; Joanne M Jordan
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.