Literature DB >> 22506920

Timeliness of cervical cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Vicki B Benard1, William Howe, Janet Royalty, William Helsel, William Kammerer, Lisa C Richardson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine time intervals from cervical cancer screening to diagnosis and treatment initiation among low-income and uninsured women in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) during two consecutive time periods.
METHODS: We analyzed NBCCEDP data for women with abnormal Pap tests (n=100,167), from which 1,417 invasive cervical cancers were diagnosed. We examined two time intervals for this study: diagnostic interval (time from abnormal Pap test to the date of definitive diagnosis) and treatment initiation interval (time from definitive diagnosis to treatment initiation) for two time periods: 1996-2002 and 2003-2009. We compared median time intervals for diagnostic and treatment initiation using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Adjusted proportions (predicted marginals) were calculated using logistic regression to examine diagnosis and treatment within program benchmarks (≤60 days).
RESULTS: Median diagnostic intervals decreased overall by 6 days (54 vs. 48 days, p<0.001). This decrease in the median diagnostic interval was noted for all variables examined. The median treatment initiation intervals remained stable over the two time periods.
CONCLUSIONS: Women screened by the NBCCEDP receive diagnostic follow-up and initiate treatment within preestablished program guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22506920      PMCID: PMC4545597          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2011.3224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  23 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Adherence to care plan in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a review of barriers and interventions.

Authors:  N Khanna; M D Phillips
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

3.  Determinants of late stage diagnosis of breast and cervical cancer: the impact of age, race, social class, and hospital type.

Authors:  J Mandelblatt; H Andrews; J Kerner; A Zauber; W Burnett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Mass screening in low-income populations: the challenges of securing diagnostic and treatment services in a national cancer screening program.

Authors:  P M Lantz; L C Richardson; L E Sever; D J Macklem; M L Hare; C E Orians; R Henson
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.265

Review 5.  2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities.

Authors:  Thomas C Wright; J Thomas Cox; L Stewart Massad; Leo B Twiggs; Edward J Wilkinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology.

Authors:  Diane Solomon; Diane Davey; Robert Kurman; Ann Moriarty; Dennis O'Connor; Marianne Prey; Stephen Raab; Mark Sherman; David Wilbur; Thomas Wright; Nancy Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Is the promise of cancer-screening programs being compromised? Quality of follow-up care after abnormal screening results.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Kathleen Shakira Washington; Amy Leader; Elizabeth Neilson; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.

Authors:  Shalini L Kulasingam; James P Hughes; Nancy B Kiviat; Constance Mao; Noel S Weiss; Jane M Kuypers; Laura A Koutsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  State implementation of the Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000: a collaborative effort among government agencies.

Authors:  Cynthia French; Susan True; Rosemarie McIntyre; Margherita Sciulli; Kathleen A Maloy
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Low-income minority women at risk for cervical cancer: a process to improve adherence to follow-up recommendations.

Authors:  V A Cardin; R M Grimes; Z D Jiang; N Pomeroy; L Harrell; P Cano
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

View more
  19 in total

1.  Determinants of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Follow-Up And Invasive Cervical Cancer Among Uninsured and Underinsured Women in New Jersey.

Authors:  Jennifer Tsui; Adana A Llanos; Michelle Doose; David Rotter; Antoinette Stroup
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2019

2.  Variation in Screening Abnormality Rates and Follow-Up of Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening within the PROSPR Consortium.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Elisabeth F Beaber; Jasmin Tiro; Jane Kim; Anne Marie McCarthy; Virginia P Quinn; V Paul Doria-Rose; Cosette M Wheeler; William E Barlow; Mackenzie Bronson; Michael Garcia; Douglas A Corley; Jennifer S Haas; Ethan A Halm; Aruna Kamineni; Carolyn M Rutter; Tor D Tosteson; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Donald L Weaver
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Overtreatment and Cost-Effectiveness of the See-and-Treat Strategy for Managing Cervical Precancer.

Authors:  Van T Nghiem; Kalatu R Davies; J Robert Beck; Michele Follen; Scott B Cantor
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Effects of program scale-up on time to resolution for patients with abnormal screening mammography results.

Authors:  Simon Craddock Lee; Robin T Higashi; Joanne M Sanders; Hong Zhu; Stephen J Inrig; Caroline Mejias; Keith E Argenbright; Jasmin A Tiro
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  A Systematic Review of Promising Strategies of Faith-Based Cancer Education and Lifestyle Interventions Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups.

Authors:  Su-I Hou; Xian Cao
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Public health national approach to reducing breast and cervical cancer disparities.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Marcus Plescia; Donatus U Ekwueme
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  From cancer screening to treatment: service delivery and referral in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Vivien Hanson; Gale D Johnson; Janet E Royalty; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Implementation of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: the beginning.

Authors:  Nancy C Lee; Faye L Wong; Patricia M Jamison; Sandra F Jones; Louise Galaska; Kevin T Brady; Barbara Wethers; George-Ann Stokes-Townsend
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Cervical cancer screening among HIV-infected women in an urban, United States safety-net healthcare system.

Authors:  Arti Barnes; Andrea C Betts; Eric K Borton; Joanne M Sanders; Sandi L Pruitt; Claudia Werner; Andres Bran; Carolee D Estelle; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Stephen J Inrig; Ethan A Halm; Celette Sugg Skinner; Jasmin A Tiro
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 10.  Impact of Age and Comorbidity on Cervical and Breast Cancer Literacy of African Americans, Latina, and Arab Women.

Authors:  Costellia H Talley; Karen Patricia Williams
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.