Literature DB >> 20042845

Utility of the AAMC's Graduation Questionnaire to study behavioral and social sciences domains in undergraduate medical education.

Patricia A Carney1, Rebecca Rdesinski, Arthur E Blank, Mark Graham, Paul Wimmers, H Carrie Chen, Britta Thompson, Stacey A Jackson, Julie Foertsch, David Hollar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) report on social and behavioral sciences (SBS) indicated that 50% of morbidity and mortality in the United States is associated with SBS factors, which the report also found were inadequately taught in medical school. A multischool collaborative explored whether the Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) could be used to study changes in the six SBS domains identified in the IOM report.
METHOD: A content analysis conducted with the GQ identified 30 SBS variables, which were narrowed to 24 using a modified Delphi approach. Summary data were pooled from nine medical schools for 2006 and 2007, representing 1,126 students. Data were generated on students' perceptions of curricular experiences, attitudes related to SBS curricula, and confidence with relevant clinical knowledge and skills. The authors determined the sample sizes required for various effect sizes to assess the utility of the GQ.
RESULTS: The 24 variables were classified into five of six IOM domains representing a total of nine analytic categories with cumulative scale means ranging from 60.8 to 93.4. Taking into account the correlations among measures over time, and assuming a two-sided test, 80% power, alpha at .05, and standard deviation of 4.1, the authors found that 34 medical schools would be required for inclusion to attain an estimated effect size of 0.50 (50%). With a sample size of nine schools, the ability to detect changes would require a very high effect size of 107%.
CONCLUSIONS: Detecting SBS changes associated with curricular innovations would require a large collaborative of medical schools. Using a national measure (the GQ) to assess curricular innovations in most areas of SBS is possible if enough medical schools were involved in such an effort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20042845      PMCID: PMC2904550          DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c464c0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  13 in total

1.  Using the case-discussion method to teach epidemiology and biostatistics.

Authors:  Paul R Marantz; William Burton; Penny Steiner-Grossman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Tracking the longitudinal stability of medical students' perceptions using the AAMC graduation questionnaire and serial evaluation surveys.

Authors:  Michele P Pugnaire; Urip Purwono; Mary L Zanetti; Michele M Carlin
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  The need for evidence in medical education: the development of best evidence medical education as an opportunity to inform, guide, and sustain medical education research.

Authors:  W Dale Dauphinee; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Educational epidemiology: applying population-based design and analytic approaches to study medical education.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; David W Nierenberg; Catherine F Pipas; W Blair Brooks; Therese A Stukel; Adam M Keller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Integrating geriatric content into a medical school curriculum: description of a successful model.

Authors:  Debra A Newell; Mukaila Raji; Steven Lieberman; Robert E Beach
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Educ       Date:  2004

6.  Have predictors of obstetrics and gynecology career choice among contemporary US medical graduates changed over time?

Authors:  Rebecca P McAlister; Dorothy A Andriole; Pamela A Rowland; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

8.  The changing paradigm of contemporary U.S. allopathic medical school graduates' career paths: analysis of the 1997-2004 national AAMC Graduation Questionnaire database.

Authors:  Donna B Jeffe; Dorothy A Andriole; Heather L Hageman; Alison J Whelan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Actual causes of death in the United States.

Authors:  J M McGinnis; W H Foege
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Teamwork training with nursing and medical students: does the method matter? Results of an interinstitutional, interdisciplinary collaboration.

Authors:  Cherri Hobgood; Gwen Sherwood; Karen Frush; David Hollar; Laura Maynard; Beverly Foster; Susan Sawning; Donald Woodyard; Carol Durham; Melanie Wright; Jeffrey Taekman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-04-27
View more
  1 in total

1.  Calibration Bias and the Interpretation of Clinical Learning Environment Perceptions Surveys.

Authors:  David A Deemer; John M Byrne; Lawrence K Loo; David Puder; Karina D Torralba; Sonny C Lee; T Michael Kashner
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-12-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.