Literature DB >> 15383347

The need for evidence in medical education: the development of best evidence medical education as an opportunity to inform, guide, and sustain medical education research.

W Dale Dauphinee1, Sharon Wood-Dauphinee.   

Abstract

The development of the Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) Collaboration is introduced in the context of other systematic review initiatives, specifically the Cochrane and Campbell collaborations. The commentary addresses two goals: to describe the current status of BEME and to situate BEME in the broader context of the medical education community's need to be accountable, to conduct research to understand educational processes and results, and the key role that medical educational research must play within the quality-improvement agenda. Lessons drawn from the evidence-based practice movement of the last ten years and the current experience with BEME suggest that, although BEME will inform some educational policies and practices, its initial success may be limited because of the paucity of studies that meet current standards for evidence and the great difficulty in conducting methodologically rigorous studies in the complex social interaction called education. Nonetheless, the need exists for medical education research to continue to address key issues in medical education using experimental designs, while at the same time anticipating the need for more situation-specific data to permit educators to monitor and benchmark their existing programs within a quality-improvement and accountability framework. The authors conclude that the very nature of being professional in today's social and fiscal context demands that medical educators provide evidence of effectiveness and efficiency of their programs while at the same time BEME and medical education research continue to grow and mature.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15383347     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200410000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  16 in total

Review 1.  A clinician-educator's roadmap to choosing and interpreting statistical tests.

Authors:  Donna M Windish; Marie Diener-West
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Reforming internal medicine residency training. A report from the Society of General Internal Medicine's task force for residency reform.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Judith L Bowen; Michael Green; Jessica Gregg; Lorenzo DiFrancesco; Eileen Reynolds; Patrick Alguire; David Battinelli; Catherine Lucey; Daniel Duffy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Designing and testing an educational innovation.

Authors:  Janet R Reid; Ryan S Baker
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-18

Review 4.  Update in internal medicine residency education: a review of the literature in 2010 and 2011.

Authors:  John E Eaton; Darcy A Reed; Brian M Aboff; Stephanie A Call; Paul R Chelminski; Uma Thanarajasingam; Jason A Post; Kris G Thomas; Denise M Dupras; Thomas J Beckman; Colin P West; Christopher M Wittich; Andrew J Halvorsen; Furman S McDonald
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-06

Review 5.  Multi-Institutional Development of a Mastoidectomy Performance Evaluation Instrument.

Authors:  Thomas Kerwin; Brad Hittle; Don Stredney; Paul De Boeck; Gregory Wiet
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 2.891

6.  Creating a cross-institutional grading scale for temporal bone dissection.

Authors:  Dinah Wan; Gregory J Wiet; D Bradley Welling; Thomas Kerwin; Don Stredney
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Utility of the AAMC's Graduation Questionnaire to study behavioral and social sciences domains in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Rebecca Rdesinski; Arthur E Blank; Mark Graham; Paul Wimmers; H Carrie Chen; Britta Thompson; Stacey A Jackson; Julie Foertsch; David Hollar
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  The impact of local health professions education grants: is it worth the investment?

Authors:  Susan Humphrey-Murto; Kyle Walker; Simran Aggarwal; Nina Preet Kaur Dhillon; Scott Rauscher; Timothy J Wood
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  Research priorities in medical education: A national study.

Authors:  Mina Tootoonchi; Nikoo Yamani; Tahereh Changiz; Alireza Yousefy
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Predictive validity evidence for medical education research study quality instrument scores: quality of submissions to JGIM's Medical Education Special Issue.

Authors:  Darcy A Reed; Thomas J Beckman; Scott M Wright; Rachel B Levine; David E Kern; David A Cook
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.