PURPOSE: To correlate punctate hyperechoic foci (PHF) on ultrasound (US) with microcalcifications detected by mammography (MMG) and at histopathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight subjects who underwent stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB) for evaluation of breast microcalcifications between April and December 2008 were evaluated for 191 lesions obtained after SVABB. The concordance between PHF on US with microcalcifications detected on MMG and histopathology was therefore evaluated for 191 lesions. Values for sensitivity and specificity were determined against histopathology as the reference standard. RESULTS: In 154 of 191 samples (80.6%), the PHF on US corresponded with microcalcifications on MMG and histopathology. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 85.3% and 80.0%, respectively, for US, and 89.7% and 90.7%, respectively, for MMG. There were no significant differences between values for US and MMG. At US, 12 PHF did not correlate with any microcalcifications at MMG or histopathology. Histopathology revealed collagen fibers in fatty tissue in 5 of 12 lesions and collagenization in 2 of 12 lesions. CONCLUSION: There was a general concordance between PHF on US and microcalcifications detected at MMG. However, in addition to microcalcifications, collagen fibers in fatty tissue and collagenization may account for some PHF. This possibility should be considered when interpreting US findings.
PURPOSE: To correlate punctate hyperechoic foci (PHF) on ultrasound (US) with microcalcifications detected by mammography (MMG) and at histopathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight subjects who underwent stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB) for evaluation of breast microcalcifications between April and December 2008 were evaluated for 191 lesions obtained after SVABB. The concordance between PHF on US with microcalcifications detected on MMG and histopathology was therefore evaluated for 191 lesions. Values for sensitivity and specificity were determined against histopathology as the reference standard. RESULTS: In 154 of 191 samples (80.6%), the PHF on US corresponded with microcalcifications on MMG and histopathology. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 85.3% and 80.0%, respectively, for US, and 89.7% and 90.7%, respectively, for MMG. There were no significant differences between values for US and MMG. At US, 12 PHF did not correlate with any microcalcifications at MMG or histopathology. Histopathology revealed collagen fibers in fatty tissue in 5 of 12 lesions and collagenization in 2 of 12 lesions. CONCLUSION: There was a general concordance between PHF on US and microcalcifications detected at MMG. However, in addition to microcalcifications, collagen fibers in fatty tissue and collagenization may account for some PHF. This possibility should be considered when interpreting US findings.
Authors: F Arfelli; V Bonvicini; A Bravin; G Cantatore; E Castelli; L Dalla Palma; M Di Michiel; R Longo; A Olivo; S Pani; D Pontoni; P Poropat; M Prest; A Rashevsky; G Tromba; A Vacchi Journal: Radiology Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 11.105