Literature DB >> 10866074

Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications.

H Gufler1, C H Buitrago-Téllez, H Madjar, K H Allmann, M Uhl, A Rohr-Reyes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the capabilities of breast ultrasound (US) for identifying microcalcifications in benign breast changes, in situ carcinomas, and small nonpalpable invasive carcinomas.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients with 49 clustered microcalcifications detected by mammography were included in this prospective study. Patients with palpable breast lesions were excluded. Breast US was performed with knowledge of mammographic findings for presence and visibility of microcalcifications, and for parenchymal structure abnormalities. Mammographic and US findings were compared with histology.
RESULTS: Nine ductal in situ carcinomas, 2 lobular in situ carcinomas, 11 invasive carcinomas and 27 benign lesions were confirmed by histology. For all lesions, US achieved a sensitivity of 75% in the detection of microcalcifications. The detection rate for microcalcification in invasive and in situ carcinomas was 100%. In 11 cases, no microcalcifications were visible on US; they all proved to be benign on histology.
CONCLUSION: Microcalcifications in malignant lesions are reliably recognized by US. They are, however, difficult to detect in fibrocystic breast changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10866074     DOI: 10.1080/028418500127345370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  7 in total

1.  Radiologic-pathological correlation of punctate hyperechoic foci by ultrasound in stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy samples.

Authors:  Hiroko Okazaki; Fumio Tsujimoto; Ichirou Maeda; Tomoyuki Ohta; Yoshihide Kanemaki; Kyoko Okamoto; Hiroshi Shimamoto; Yukari Yabuki; Haruki Ogata; Tomohiko Ohta; Mamoru Fukuda; Yasuo Nakajima
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Breast US in patients with breast cancer presenting as only microcalcifications on mammography: can US differentiate ductal carcinoma in situ from invasive cancer?

Authors:  Ji-Yeon Han; Jin Hwa Lee; Eun-Kyung Kim; Suyoung Shin; Myong Jin Kang; Keun-Cheol Lee; Kyung Jin Nam
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ana Hrkac Pustahija; Gordana Ivanac; Boris Brkljacic
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Imaging features that distinguish pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from DCIS with microinvasion.

Authors:  Hongli Wang; Jinjiang Lin; Jianguo Lai; Cui Tan; Yaping Yang; Ran Gu; Xiaofang Jiang; Fengtao Liu; Yue Hu; Fengxi Su
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-03

5.  Clinical Significance of Microcalcifications Detection in Invasive Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuki Hashimoto; Aya Murata; Naoki Miyamoto; Toshihiro Takamori; Yuta Hosoda; Yukari Endo; Yuka Kodani; Kengo Sato; Keiko Hosoya; Kiyosuke Ishiguro; Yasuaki Hirooka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.641

6.  Detectability and Usefulness of Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound in Patients with Suspicious Microcalcifications on Mammography: Comparison with Handheld Breast Ultrasound.

Authors:  Jae Jeong Choi; Sung Hun Kim; Bong Joo Kang; Byung Joo Song
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.588

7.  Diagnostic Efficacy across Dense and Non-Dense Breasts during Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Ultrasound Assessment for Recalled Women.

Authors:  Ibrahim Hadadi; Jillian Clarke; William Rae; Mark McEntee; Wendy Vincent; Ernest Ekpo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.