Literature DB >> 16110292

Ultrasound Demonstration of Mammographically Detected Microcalcifications in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast.

Takeshi Nagashima1, Hideyuki Hashimoto, Keiko Oshida, Shigeharu Nakano, Naoto Tanabe, Takashi Nikaido, Keiji Koda, Masaru Miyazaki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast microcalcifications are difficult to depict by ultrasound (US). However, recent advances in US equipment and the refinement of breast imaging techniques have improved the detection and characterization of small breast lesions. The present study attempts to determine whether US examination is able to demonstrate nonpalpable breast lesions associated with mammographically detected microcalcifications without mass density or distortion, and to evaluate the clinical reliability of US-guided procedures, especially in cases of ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS)of the breast.
METHODS: The subjects consisted of 73 patients with breast cancer diagnosed preoperatively as DCIS by stereotactic core needle biopsies, all of whom had microcalcifications without other abnormalities on mammography. The radiological appearance and size of the clustered microcalcifications were evaluated. US examinations were performed preoperatively, and the detection rates were assessed. Sonographically detected lesions underwent US-guided wire localization followed by surgical excision.
RESULTS: The lesions associated with microcalcifications were identified sonographically in 54 of 73 cases (74%), and the pathological examination revealed breast cancer in all of the corresponding specimens. Lesions with linear-branching shape, segmental-linear distribution and category-5 calcifications on mammography had a high level of visibility on US. The US visible cases had a larger size of calcified area on mammography when compared with US invisible cases. Pathologically, the lesions were more frequently seen on US in cases with minimally invasive cancer or with comedo type DCIS.
CONCLUSIONS: US examination is an effective method for identifying and localizing breast microcalcifications, and can be used as an alternative to stereotactic localization in selected patients with early breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16110292     DOI: 10.2325/jbcs.12.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   4.239


  14 in total

1.  The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on surgical treatment and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Kaoru Itakura; Juan Lessing; Theadora Sakata; Amy Heinzerling; Eline Vriens; Dorota Wisner; Michael Alvarado; Laura Esserman; Cheryl Ewing; Nola Hylton; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Radiologic-pathological correlation of punctate hyperechoic foci by ultrasound in stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy samples.

Authors:  Hiroko Okazaki; Fumio Tsujimoto; Ichirou Maeda; Tomoyuki Ohta; Yoshihide Kanemaki; Kyoko Okamoto; Hiroshi Shimamoto; Yukari Yabuki; Haruki Ogata; Tomohiko Ohta; Mamoru Fukuda; Yasuo Nakajima
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Ultrasound-guided preoperative localization of breast lesions: a good choice.

Authors:  Giorgio Carlino; Pierluigi Rinaldi; Michela Giuliani; Rossella Rella; Enida Bufi; Federico Padovano; Chiara Ciardi; Maurizio Romani; Paolo Belli; Riccardo Manfredi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-10-26

4.  Imaging features that distinguish pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from DCIS with microinvasion.

Authors:  Hongli Wang; Jinjiang Lin; Jianguo Lai; Cui Tan; Yaping Yang; Ran Gu; Xiaofang Jiang; Fengtao Liu; Yue Hu; Fengxi Su
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-03

Review 5.  Recent advances in the surgical care of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Alessandra Mascaro; Massimo Farina; Raffaella Gigli; Carlo E Vitelli; Lucio Fortunato
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Clinical Significance of Microcalcifications Detection in Invasive Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuki Hashimoto; Aya Murata; Naoki Miyamoto; Toshihiro Takamori; Yuta Hosoda; Yukari Endo; Yuka Kodani; Kengo Sato; Keiko Hosoya; Kiyosuke Ishiguro; Yasuaki Hirooka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.641

7.  Ultrasonographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: analysis of 219 lesions.

Authors:  Jun Kang Li; Huan Fan Wang; Yan He; Yong Huang; Gang Liu; Zhi Li Wang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-12

8.  Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis Risk in Breast Cancer: A Potential Application on Omitting Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.

Authors:  Xi'E Hu; Jingyi Xue; Shujia Peng; Ping Yang; Zhenyu Yang; Lin Yang; Yanming Dong; Lijuan Yuan; Ting Wang; Guoqiang Bao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Features of breast tuberculosis determined by ultrasound imaging: report of 45 cases.

Authors:  Wenzhi Zhang; Ying Zhang; Gaoyi Yang; Tianzhuo Yu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  Are both ultrasonography and mammography necessary for cancer investigation of breast lumps in resource-limited countries?

Authors:  Rungnapa Chairat; Adisorn Puttisri; Asani Pamarapa; Sahatham Samintharapanya; Chamaiporn Tawichasri; Jayanton Patumanond
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.