Literature DB >> 20035357

Clinical results and development of heterotopic ossification in total cervical disc replacement during a 4-year follow-up.

Petr Suchomel1, Lubomír Jurák, Vladimír Benes, Radim Brabec, Ondrej Bradác, Shamel Elgawhary.   

Abstract

Cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) aims to decrease the incidence of adjacent segment disease through motion preservation in the operated disc space. Ongoing data collection and increasing number of studies describing heterotopic ossification (HO) resulting in decreased mobility of implants, forced us to carefully evaluate our long-term clinical and morphological results of patients with CTDR. We present the first 54 consecutive patients treated with 65 ProdiscC prostheses during a 12-month period (2/2004-3/2005). All patients signed an informed consent and were included in prospective long-term study approved by hospital ethical committee. The 1- and 2-year follow-up analysis were available for all patients included and 4-year results for 50 patients (60 implants). Clinical (neck disability index-NDI, visual analog scale-VAS) and radiological follow-up was conducted at 1-, 2- and 4-years after the procedure. The Mehren/Suchomel modification of McAfee scale was used to classify the appearance of HO. Mean preoperative NDI was 34.5%, VAS for neck pain intensity 4.6 and VAS for arm pain intensity 5.0. At 1-, 2- and 4-year follow-up, the mean NDI was 30.7, 27.2, and 30.4, mean VAS for neck pain intensity 2.5, 2.1 and 2.9 and mean VAS for arm pain intensity pain 2.2, 1.9 and 2.3, respectively. Significant HO (grade III) was present in 45% of implants and segmental ankylosis (grade IV) in another 18% 4 years after intervention. This finding had no clinical consequences and 92% of patients would undergo the same surgery again. Our clinical results (NDI, VAS) are comparable with fusion techniques. Although, advanced non-fusion technology is used, a significant frequency of HO formation and spontaneous fusion in cervical disc replacement surgery must be anticipated during long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20035357      PMCID: PMC2899807          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1259-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

1.  Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion.

Authors:  Jason C Eck; S Craig Humphreys; Tae-Hong Lim; Soon Tack Jeong; Jesse G Kim; Scott D Hodges; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Total hip arthroplasty. The role of antiinflammatory medications in the prevention of heterotopic ossification.

Authors:  P Kjaersgaard-Andersen; S A Schmidt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The success of anterior cervical arthrodesis adjacent to a previous fusion.

Authors:  A S Hilibrand; J U Yoo; G D Carlson; H H Bohlman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  S L Weinhoffer; R D Guyer; M Herbert; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification.

Authors:  A F Brooker; J W Bowerman; R A Robinson; L H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy.

Authors:  H Baba; N Furusawa; S Imura; N Kawahara; H Tsuchiya; K Tomita
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level.

Authors:  Jan Goffin; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johannes van Loon; Adrian Casey; Pierre Kehr; Klaus Liebig; Bengt Lind; Carlo Logroscino; Rosella Sgrambiglia; Vincent Pointillart
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up.

Authors:  J Beaurain; P Bernard; T Dufour; J M Fuentes; I Hovorka; J Huppert; J P Steib; J M Vital; L Aubourg; T Vila
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Long-term results after anterior cervical fusion and osteosynthetic stabilization for fractures and/or dislocations of the cervical spine.

Authors:  J Goffin; J van Loon; F Van Calenbergh; C Plets
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1995-12

10.  Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement.

Authors:  Paul C McAfee; Bryan W Cunningham; John Devine; Eric Williams; Janet Yu-Yahiro
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-08
View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Xinwei Wang; Wanshan Bai; Xiaolong Shen; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical total disc replacement C5/6.

Authors:  Petr Suchomel; Pavel Barsa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Sebastian Hartmann; Michaela Gstöttner; Ricarda Lechner; Michael Gabl; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Does sagittal position of the CTDR-related centre of rotation influence functional outcome? Prospective 2-year follow-up analysis.

Authors:  P Suchomel; L Jurák; J Antinheimo; J Pohjola; J Stulik; H-J Meisel; M Čabraja; C Woiciechowsky; B Bruchmann; I Shackleford; R Arregui; S Sola
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Midterm outcomes of total cervical total disc replacement with Bryan prosthesis.

Authors:  Zhenxiang Zhang; Wei Zhu; Lixian Zhu; Yaqing Du
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-11

6.  Heterotopic ossification is related to change in disc space angle after Prestige-LP cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lingyun Hu; Jianying Zhang; Hao Liu; Yang Meng; Yi Yang; Guangzhou Li; Chen Ding; Beiyu Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Disc prosthesis replacement and interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease: comparative analysis of 176 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Barbara Cappelletto; Fabrizia Giorgiutti; Claudio Veltri; Massimo A Trevigne; Paolo Facchin; Paolo Del Fabro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Five-year results of cervical disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry.

Authors:  Emin Aghayev; Christian Bärlocher; Friedrich Sgier; Mustafa Hasdemir; Klaus F Steinsiepe; Frank Wernli; François Porchet; Oliver Hausmann; Aymen Ramadan; Gianluca Maestretti; Uwe Ebeling; Michal Neukamp; Christoph Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Multi-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus single-level CDA for the treatment of cervical disc diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hua Zhao; Lei Cheng; Yong Hou; Yi Liu; Ben Liu; Jyoti Joshi Mundra; Lin Nie
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Clinical and radiological analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up results compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Tao Lei; Yaming Liu; Hui Wang; Jiaxin Xu; Qinghua Ma; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.