Literature DB >> 24515394

Midterm outcomes of total cervical total disc replacement with Bryan prosthesis.

Zhenxiang Zhang1, Wei Zhu, Lixian Zhu, Yaqing Du.   

Abstract

Short-term results have indicated that the Bryan cervical total disc replacement (TDR) favorably compares to anterior cervical decompression and fusion, while it is associated with fewer complications and higher levels of satisfaction. The aim of the present work was to assess the safety and efficacy of the device in the treatment for cervical degenerative disc disease, at 6-year follow-up. Fifty-eighty patients have performed their 6-year follow-up visit and have been analyzed clinically and radiologically. Clinical evaluation was based on neck disability index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS), SF-36, and range of motion (ROM) at index levels. Each measurement was taken preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 6 years postoperatively. Complications and re-operations were also investigated. Occurrences of heterotopic ossifications (HO) and of adjacent level degeneration were detected by radiographs at 6-year follow-up. The mean NDI and VAS scores for arm and neck were significantly reduced for all postoperative periods compared with the average preoperative values. Motion was preserved at index levels (mean ROM = 8.6° ± 0.2° at 6 years), and 81.3 % of the segments were mobile at 6 years. HO was evident in 12/64 operated segments and not restricting the movement of the prosthesis in any case at 6-year follow-up. Six of sixty-four upper adjacent levels and 4/64 lower adjacent levels showed a slight degradation. There was 2 case of posterior migration of the prosthesis, which did not cause any clinical symptoms. No case showed evidence of subsidence, wear of the implant. At a 6-year follow-up, the cervical TDR using Bryan prosthesis displayed satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes without any significant complication. However, future efforts need to be directed toward the evaluation of a larger number of patients with longer follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24515394     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1424-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  29 in total

1.  Implant design may influence delayed heterotopic ossification after total disk arthroplasty in lumbar spine.

Authors:  Eubulus J Kerr; Ajay Jawahar; Stephen Kay; David A Cavanaugh; Pierce D Nunley
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2009-12

2.  Cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hua Jiang; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu; Bangping Qian; Xusheng Qiu; Mingliang Ji
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Use of nitinol shape memory alloy staples (NiTi clips) after cervical discoidectomy: minimally invasive instrumentation and long-term results.

Authors:  D Singh; S Sinha; H Singh; A Jagetia; S Gupta; P Gangoo; M Tandon
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2011-09-15

4.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jun-Ming Cao; Ying-Ze Zhang; Yong Shen; Jia-Xin Xu; Wen-Yuan Ding; Da-Long Yang; Di Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  A clinical analysis of 4- and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.

Authors:  Jan Goffin; Johan van Loon; Frank Van Calenbergh; Bailey Lipscomb
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-03

Review 6.  Degenerative disease of the cervical spine and its relationship to athletes.

Authors:  Konstantinos M Triantafillou; William Lauerman; S Babak Kalantar
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.182

7.  Anterior cervical decompression and fusion on neck range of motion, pain, and function: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Merrill R Landers; Kate A Addis; Jason K Longhurst; Bree-lyn Vom Steeg; Emilio J Puentedura; Michael D Daubs
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis.

Authors:  Paul A Anderson; Rick C Sasso; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.

Authors:  Jan Goffin; Adrian Casey; Pierre Kehr; Klaus Liebig; Bengt Lind; Carlo Logroscino; Vincent Pointillart; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johannes van Loon
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Daniel Murrey; Michael Janssen; Rick Delamarter; Jeffrey Goldstein; Jack Zigler; Bobby Tay; Bruce Darden
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  5 in total

1.  The best cited articles of the European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST): a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Cyril Mauffrey; Marius M Scarlat; Patrick Simon; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Samo K Fokter; Pierre Kehr
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-14

2.  10-year follow-up after implantation of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.

Authors:  Joost Dejaegher; Joris Walraevens; Johannes van Loon; Frank Van Calenbergh; Philippe Demaerel; Jan Goffin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cervical total disc replacement is superior to anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yujie Zhang; Chengzhen Liang; Yiqing Tao; Xiaopeng Zhou; Hao Li; Fangcai Li; Qixin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A Case of Implant Migration Following Bi-level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ji-Liang Zhai; Xiao Chang; Jian-Hua Hu; Xi-Sheng Weng
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Traumatic Migration of the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Scott C Wagner; Daniel G Kang; Melvin D Helgeson
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-04-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.