Literature DB >> 8605425

Long-term results after anterior cervical fusion and osteosynthetic stabilization for fractures and/or dislocations of the cervical spine.

J Goffin1, J van Loon, F Van Calenbergh, C Plets.   

Abstract

This study presents the 5-9-year follow-up after anterior cervical fusion and osteosynthetic stabilization anterior plating for fractures and/or dislocations of the cervical spine in 25 patients. Adequate bony fusion was obtained in all patients within 1 year postoperatively. There were no problems of late screw loosening. Fracture of the osteosynthetic plate occurred in one patient. Late degenerative changes of the cervical spine at the disc levels adjacent to the fusion area were radiologically detected in 15 of the 25 patients (60%) and were related to the following situations: fusion on more than one disc level, fusion on a lower cervical segment, Frankel class A-C at admission, and hyperflexion injuries. However, these late degenerative changes had no subjective or clinical repercussions, at least until now. From a neurological point of view all patients remained stable postoperatively and no patients had late deterioration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8605425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord        ISSN: 0895-0385


  44 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of anterior cervical spine plate fixation systems with unicortical and bicortical screw purchase.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Michael Blauth; Daniel Briem; Ulf Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine locked and unlocked plate-fixation systems.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Daniel Briem; Michael Blauth; Ulf Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Jae Hyuk Shin; Jose Joefrey Arbatin; Moon Soo Park; Yung Khee Chung; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cervical total disc replacement C5/6.

Authors:  Petr Suchomel; Pavel Barsa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effects of unisegmental disc compression on adjacent segments: an in vivo animal model.

Authors:  Frank Unglaub; Thorsten Guehring; Helga Lorenz; Claus Carstens; Markus W Kroeber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Surgical outcome of cervical arthroplasty using bryan(r).

Authors:  Hong-Ki Kim; Myung-Hyun Kim; Do-Sang Cho; Sung-Hak Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-12-31

7.  Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year's results.

Authors:  A Nabhan; B Ishak; W I Steudel; S Ramadhan; O Steimer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison of a novel anterior-only approach and the conventional posterior-anterior approach for cervical facet dislocation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ke Liu; Zhengfeng Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Diagnosing cervical fusion: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Nanin Sethi; James Devney; Holly L Steiner; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31

10.  Reduction in range of cervical motion on serial long-term follow-up in patients undergoing oblique corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Mazda K Turel; Sauradeep Sarkar; Krishna Prabhu; Roy T Daniel; K S Jacob; Ari G Chacko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.