Literature DB >> 12435970

Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion.

Jason C Eck1, S Craig Humphreys, Tae-Hong Lim, Soon Tack Jeong, Jesse G Kim, Scott D Hodges, Howard S An.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A biomechanical study was performed using cadaveric cervical spine specimens.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical studies have reported that patients with spinal fusion are at greater risk of pathology and early disc degeneration at adjacent levels. It is hypothesized that eliminating motion at one level leads to hypermobility and increased forces at adjacent levels, thus increasing the rate of disc degeneration.
METHODS: Six cadaveric cervical spine specimens were tested. Specimens were stabilized at T1 and loaded at C3 to 20 degrees of flexion and 15 degrees of extension. Intradiscal pressures and segmental motion at C4-C5 and C6-C7 were recorded first on intact specimens, and then after anterior cervical plating at C5-C6. Changes in intradiscal pressure and segmental motion were calculated and statistically analyzed using a paired Student t test.
RESULTS: Intradiscal pressures were significantly increased during flexion at both adjacent levels. The pressure increased by 73.2% at C4-C5 (P = 0.002), and by 45.3% at C6-C7 (P = 0.006). Intradiscal pressures increased at both adjacent levels during extension, but not significantly. During flexion, segmental motion increased at both adjacent levels, with greater increases at C4-C5. During extension, segmental motion increased at both adjacent levels, with greater increases at C6-C7.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical studies have reported increased rates of disc degeneration at levels adjacent to fusion. It is believed that eliminating motion through fusion shifts the load to the adjacent levels, causing earlier disc degeneration. This study has shown that significant increases in intradiscal pressure and segmental motion occur at levels adjacent to fusion during normal range of motion. These results may partially explain the mechanism of early disc degeneration at levels adjacent to cervical spine fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12435970     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  177 in total

Review 1.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Xinwei Wang; Wanshan Bai; Xiaolong Shen; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the cervical spine after anterior cervical decompression and fusion at an adjacent level: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Sadayoshi Watanabe; Nozomu Inoue; Tomonori Yamaguchi; Yoshitaka Hirano; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Shintaro Nishida; Yuichi Hirose; Junichi Mizuno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Modified transcorporeal anterior cervical microforaminotomy assisted by O-arm-based navigation: a technical case report.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Sang Soo Eun; Nicolas Prada; Gun Choi; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Sagittal segmental alignment as predictor of adjacent-level degeneration after a cloward procedure.

Authors:  Cesare Faldini; Stavroula Pagkrati; Danilo Leonetti; Maria Teresa Miscione; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Radiological Assessment of the Effect of Congenital C3-4 Synostosis on Adjacent Segments.

Authors:  Myung-Sang Moon; Min Geun Yoon; Ki-Tae Kwon; Sung-Su Kim; Jin-Fu Lin; Bong-Jin Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-12-08

Review 8.  Adjacent segment disease perspective and review of the literature.

Authors:  Fanor M Saavedra-Pozo; Renato A M Deusdara; Edward C Benzel
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

9.  Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  What are the associative factors of adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical spine surgery? Comparative study between anterior cervical fusion and arthroplasty with 5-year follow-up MRI and CT.

Authors:  Jeong Yoon Park; Kyung Hyun Kim; Sung Uk Kuh; Dong Kyu Chin; Keun Su Kim; Yong Eun Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.