Literature DB >> 20031986

Eyes are on us, but nobody cares: are eye cues relevant for strong reciprocity?

Ernst Fehr1, Frédéric Schneider.   

Abstract

Strong reciprocity is characterized by the willingness to altruistically reward cooperative acts and to altruistically punish norm-violating, defecting behaviours. Recent evidence suggests that subtle reputation cues, such as eyes staring at subjects during their choices, may enhance prosocial behaviour. Thus, in principle, strong reciprocity could also be affected by eye cues. We investigate the impact of eye cues on trustees' altruistic behaviour in a trust game and find zero effect. Neither the subjects who are classified as prosocial nor the subjects who are classified as selfish respond to these cues. In sharp contrast to the irrelevance of subtle reputation cues for strong reciprocity, we find a large effect of explicit, pecuniary reputation incentives on the trustees' prosociality. Trustees who can acquire a good reputation that benefits them in future interactions honour trust much more than trustees who cannot build a good reputation. These results cast doubt on hypotheses suggesting that strong reciprocity is easily malleable by implicit reputation cues not backed by explicit reputation incentives.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20031986      PMCID: PMC2871936          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

1.  Cooperation through image scoring in humans.

Authors:  C Wedekind; M Milinski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Why people punish defectors. Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas.

Authors:  J Henrich; R Boyd
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Daniel Nettle; Gilbert Roberts
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: image scoring or standing strategy?

Authors:  M Milinski; D Semmann; T C Bakker; H J Krambeck
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Game theory and human evolution: a critique of some recent interpretations of experimental games.

Authors:  Edward H Hagen; Peter Hammerstein
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Strong reciprocity and human sociality.

Authors:  H Gintis
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2000-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms.

Authors:  Ernst Fehr; Urs Fischbacher; Simon Gächter
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2002-03

8.  The evolution of altruistic punishment.

Authors:  Robert Boyd; Herbert Gintis; Samuel Bowles; Peter J Richerson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Egalitarian motives in humans.

Authors:  Christopher T Dawes; James H Fowler; Tim Johnson; Richard McElreath; Oleg Smirnov
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations.

Authors:  Samuel Bowles; Herbert Gintis
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.570

View more
  23 in total

1.  Wrath of God: religious primes and punishment.

Authors:  Ryan McKay; Charles Efferson; Harvey Whitehouse; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  On the psychology of cooperation in humans and other primates: combining the natural history and experimental evidence of prosociality.

Authors:  Adrian V Jaeggi; Judith M Burkart; Carel P Van Schaik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  To qualify as a social partner, humans hide severe punishment, although their observed cooperativeness is decisive.

Authors:  Bettina Rockenbach; Manfred Milinski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Eyes, More Than Other Facial Features, Enhance Real-World Donation Behavior.

Authors:  Caroline Kelsey; Amrisha Vaish; Tobias Grossmann
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2018-12

5.  The 'spiteful' origins of human cooperation.

Authors:  Frank W Marlowe; J Colette Berbesque; Clark Barrett; Alexander Bolyanatz; Michael Gurven; David Tracer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Evolutionary foundations of human prosocial sentiments.

Authors:  Joan B Silk; Bailey R House
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Images of eyes enhance investments in a real-life public good.

Authors:  Damien Francey; Ralph Bergmüller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A positive effect of flowers rather than eye images in a large-scale, cross-cultural dictator game.

Authors:  Nichola J Raihani; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Religion and morality.

Authors:  Ryan McKay; Harvey Whitehouse
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Young children are more generous when others are aware of their actions.

Authors:  Kristin L Leimgruber; Alex Shaw; Laurie R Santos; Kristina R Olson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.