Literature DB >> 10966755

Strong reciprocity and human sociality.

H Gintis1.   

Abstract

Human groups maintain a high level of sociality despite a low level of relatedness among group members. This paper reviews the evidence for an empirically identifiable form of prosocial behavior in humans, which we call "strong reciprocity", that may in part explain human sociality. A strong reciprocator is predisposed to cooperate with others and punish non-cooperators, even when this behavior cannot be justified in terms of extended kinship or reciprocal altruism. We present a simple model, stylized but plausible, of the evolutionary emergence of strong reciprocity. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10966755     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  118 in total

1.  Reward and punishment.

Authors:  K Sigmund; C Hauert; M A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  From reciprocity to unconditional altruism through signalling benefits.

Authors:  Arnon Lotem; Michael A Fishman; Lewi Stone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The cultural contagion of conflict.

Authors:  Michele Gelfand; Garriy Shteynberg; Tiane Lee; Janetta Lun; Sarah Lyons; Chris Bell; Joan Y Chiao; C Bayan Bruss; May Al Dabbagh; Zeynep Aycan; Abdel-Hamid Abdel-Latif; Munqith Dagher; Hilal Khashan; Nazar Soomro
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Goetz; Dacher Keltner; Emiliana Simon-Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Suicide as a derangement of the self-sacrificial aspect of eusociality.

Authors:  Thomas E Joiner; Melanie A Hom; Christopher R Hagan; Caroline Silva
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Resistance to extreme strategies, rather than prosocial preferences, can explain human cooperation in public goods games.

Authors:  Rolf Kümmerli; Maxwell N Burton-Chellew; Adin Ross-Gillespie; Stuart A West
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Third-party punishment increases cooperation in children through (misaligned) expectations and conditional cooperation.

Authors:  Philipp Lergetporer; Silvia Angerer; Daniela Glätzle-Rützler; Matthias Sutter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Reciprocity, culture and human cooperation: previous insights and a new cross-cultural experiment.

Authors:  Simon Gächter; Benedikt Herrmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Similarity increases altruistic punishment in humans.

Authors:  Thomas Mussweiler; Axel Ockenfels
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Individual heterogeneity and costly punishment: a volunteer's dilemma.

Authors:  Wojtek Przepiorka; Andreas Diekmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.