Literature DB >> 21106588

Wrath of God: religious primes and punishment.

Ryan McKay1, Charles Efferson, Harvey Whitehouse, Ernst Fehr.   

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that priming participants with religious concepts promotes prosocial sharing behaviour. In the present study, we investigated whether religious priming also promotes the costly punishment of unfair behaviour. A total of 304 participants played a punishment game. Before the punishment stage began, participants were subliminally primed with religion primes, secular punishment primes or control primes. We found that religious primes strongly increased the costly punishment of unfair behaviours for a subset of our participants--those who had previously donated to a religious organization. We discuss two proximate mechanisms potentially underpinning this effect. The first is a 'supernatural watcher' mechanism, whereby religious participants punish unfair behaviours when primed because they sense that not doing so will enrage or disappoint an observing supernatural agent. The second is a 'behavioural priming' mechanism, whereby religious primes activate cultural norms pertaining to fairness and its enforcement and occasion behaviour consistent with those norms. We conclude that our results are consistent with dual inheritance proposals about religion and cooperation, whereby religions harness the byproducts of genetically inherited cognitive mechanisms in ways that enhance the survival prospects of their adherents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21106588      PMCID: PMC3097833          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

1.  Exploring the natural foundations of religion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Development and validation of the situational self-awareness scale.

Authors:  J M Govern; L A Marsch
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2001-09

3.  The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals.

Authors:  J A Bargh; P M Gollwitzer; A Lee-Chai; K Barndollar; R Trötschel
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-12

Review 4.  Religion is natural.

Authors:  Paul Bloom
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2007-01

5.  God is watching you: priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game.

Authors:  Azim F Shariff; Ara Norenzayan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-09

6.  The origins of religion: evolved adaptation or by-product?

Authors:  Ilkka Pyysiäinen; Marc Hauser
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action.

Authors:  J A Bargh; M Chen; L Burrows
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1996-08

8.  Ritual, emotion, and sacred symbols : The evolution of religion as an adaptive complex.

Authors:  Candace S Alcorta; Richard Sosis
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2005-12

9.  Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends.

Authors:  Jesse M Bering; Katrina McLeod; Todd K Shackelford
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2005-12

10.  The folk psychology of souls.

Authors:  Jesse M Bering
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 12.579

View more
  13 in total

1.  Heaven can wait. How religion modulates temporal discounting.

Authors:  Fabio Paglieri; Anna M Borghi; Lorenza S Colzato; Bernhard Hommel; Claudia Scorolli
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-01-24

2.  Outsourcing punishment to God: beliefs in divine control reduce earthly punishment.

Authors:  Kristin Laurin; Azim F Shariff; Joseph Henrich; Aaron C Kay
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Binding moral values gain importance in the presence of close others.

Authors:  Daniel A Yudkin; Ana P Gantman; Wilhelm Hofmann; Jordi Quoidbach
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Mentalizing deficits constrain belief in a personal God.

Authors:  Ara Norenzayan; Will M Gervais; Kali H Trzesniewski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The sex premium in religiously motivated moral judgment.

Authors:  Liana S E Hone; Thomas G McCauley; Eric J Pedersen; Evan C Carter; Michael E McCullough
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2020-05-28

Review 6.  Religion and morality.

Authors:  Ryan McKay; Harvey Whitehouse
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Religious pro-sociality? Experimental evidence from a sample of 766 Spaniards.

Authors:  Pablo Brañas-Garza; Antonio M Espín; Shoshana Neuman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Puzzle Unsolved: Failure to Observe Different Effects of God and Religion Primes on Intergroup Attitudes.

Authors:  Jonathan E Ramsay; Eddie M W Tong; Joyce S Pang; Avijit Chowdhury
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Free to help? An experiment on free will belief and altruism.

Authors:  Job Harms; Kellie Liket; John Protzko; Vera Schölmerich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Economic and evolutionary hypotheses for cross-population variation in parochialism.

Authors:  Daniel J Hruschka; Joseph Henrich
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.