Literature DB >> 20029227

Multiple subsampling of dense SNP data localizes disease genes with increased precision.

William C L Stewart1, Anna L Peljto, David A Greenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Current linkage studies detect and localize trait loci using genotypes sampled at hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Such data should provide precise estimates of trait location once linkage has been established. However, correlations between nearby SNPs can distort the information about trait location. Traditionally, when faced with this dilemma, three approaches have been used: (1) ignore the correlation; (2) approximate the correlation; or, (3) analyze a single, approximately uncorrelated subset of the original dense data.
METHODS: Here, we examine and test a simple and efficient estimator of trait location that averages location estimates across random subsamples of the original dense data. Based on pairwise estimates of correlation, we ensure that the SNPs within each subsample are approximately uncorrelated. In addition, we use the nonparametric bootstrap procedure to compute narrow, high-resolution candidate gene regions (i.e. confidence intervals for the true trait location).
RESULTS: Using simulated data, we show that the three existing approaches to dense SNP linkage analysis (described above) can yield biased and/or inefficient estimation depending on the underlying correlation structure. With respect to mean squared error, our estimator outperforms the third approach, and is as good as, but usually better than the first and second approaches. Relative to the third approach, our estimator led to a 47.5% reduction in the candidate gene region length based on the analysis of 15 hypertension families genotyped at approximately 500,000 SNPs.
CONCLUSION: The method we developed will be an important tool for constructing high-resolution candidate gene regions that could ultimately aid in targeting regions for sequencing projects. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20029227      PMCID: PMC2918647          DOI: 10.1159/000267995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  21 in total

1.  Islands of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  D B Goldstein
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Ignoring linkage disequilibrium among tightly linked markers induces false-positive evidence of linkage for affected sib pair analysis.

Authors:  Qiqing Huang; Sanjay Shete; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Handling marker-marker linkage disequilibrium: pedigree analysis with clustered markers.

Authors:  Gonçalo R Abecasis; Janis E Wigginton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Ignoring intermarker linkage disequilibrium induces false-positive evidence of linkage for consanguineous pedigrees when genotype data is missing for any pedigree member.

Authors:  Bingshan Li; Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  Variant of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene confers risk of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Struan F A Grant; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Inga Reynisdottir; Rafn Benediktsson; Andrei Manolescu; Jesus Sainz; Agnar Helgason; Hreinn Stefansson; Valur Emilsson; Anna Helgadottir; Unnur Styrkarsdottir; Kristinn P Magnusson; G Bragi Walters; Ebba Palsdottir; Thorbjorg Jonsdottir; Thorunn Gudmundsdottir; Arnaldur Gylfason; Jona Saemundsdottir; Robert L Wilensky; Muredach P Reilly; Daniel J Rader; Yu Bagger; Claus Christiansen; Vilmundur Gudnason; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Augustine Kong; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data.

Authors:  R C Elston; J Stewart
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 0.444

7.  Linkage disequilibrium in admixed populations: applications in gene mapping.

Authors:  D Briscoe; J C Stephens; S J O'Brien
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  Sequential imputation for multilocus linkage analysis.

Authors:  M Irwin; N Cox; A Kong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans.

Authors:  E S Lander; P Green
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Handling linkage disequilibrium in linkage analysis using dense single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  Kelly Cho; Qiong Yang; Josée Dupuis
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2007-12-18
View more
  6 in total

1.  Finding disease genes: a fast and flexible approach for analyzing high-throughput data.

Authors:  William C L Stewart; Esther N Drill; David A Greenberg
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Obtaining accurate p values from a dense SNP linkage scan.

Authors:  William C L Stewart; Ryan L Subaran
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 3.  How should we be searching for genes for common epilepsy? A critique and a prescription.

Authors:  David A Greenberg; William C L Stewart
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.864

4.  Increasing the power of association studies with affected families, unrelated cases and controls.

Authors:  William C L Stewart; Jane Cerise
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Next-generation linkage and association methods applied to hypertension: a multifaceted approach to the analysis of sequence data.

Authors:  William Cl Stewart; Yungui Huang; David A Greenberg; Veronica J Vieland
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2014-06-17

6.  A powerful test of independent assortment that determines genome-wide significance quickly and accurately.

Authors:  W C L Stewart; V R Hager
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.821

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.