Literature DB >> 8120361

Linkage disequilibrium in admixed populations: applications in gene mapping.

D Briscoe1, J C Stephens, S J O'Brien.   

Abstract

A method to detect linkage of genetic traits to polymorphic DNA markers in outbred populations when pedigree analysis is not feasible is presented. The procedure takes advantage of increased linkage disequilibrium that occurs when isolated races or subspecies mate and interbreed. By selecting restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) or microsatellite marker loci that have different allele frequencies in admixed populations, genetic associations produced de novo by hybridization will persist as a function of theta (map distance) for 10-20 generations after initial interbreeding. By careful selection of loci and study populations, the procedure detects linkage of traits otherwise refractory to linkage analysis.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8120361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  41 in total

1.  Population admixture: detection by Hardy-Weinberg test and its quantitative effects on linkage-disequilibrium methods for localizing genes underlying complex traits.

Authors:  H W Deng; W M Chen; R R Recker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A scan for linkage disequilibrium across the human genome.

Authors:  G A Huttley; M W Smith; M Carrington; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Significant admixture linkage disequilibrium across 30 cM around the FY locus in African Americans.

Authors:  J A Lautenberger; J C Stephens; S J O'Brien; M W Smith
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Population structure in admixed populations: effect of admixture dynamics on the pattern of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  C L Pfaff; E J Parra; C Bonilla; K Hiester; P M McKeigue; M I Kamboh; R G Hutchinson; R E Ferrell; E Boerwinkle; M D Shriver
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-12-07       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Ethnic-difference markers for use in mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Heather E Collins-Schramm; Carolyn M Phillips; Darwin J Operario; Jane S Lee; James L Weber; Robert L Hanson; William C Knowler; Richard Cooper; Hongzhe Li; Michael F Seldin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-02-11       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Markers for mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium in African American and Hispanic populations.

Authors:  M W Smith; J A Lautenberger; H D Shin; J P Chretien; S Shrestha; D A Gilbert; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Consistent long-range linkage disequilibrium generated by admixture in a Bantu-Semitic hybrid population.

Authors:  J F Wilson; D B Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-08-28       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Mexican American ancestry-informative markers: examination of population structure and marker characteristics in European Americans, Mexican Americans, Amerindians and Asians.

Authors:  Heather E Collins-Schramm; Bill Chima; Takanobu Morii; Kimberly Wah; Yolanda Figueroa; Lindsey A Criswell; Robert L Hanson; William C Knowler; Gabriel Silva; John W Belmont; Michael F Seldin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Markers informative for ancestry demonstrate consistent megabase-length linkage disequilibrium in the African American population.

Authors:  Heather E Collins-Schramm; Bill Chima; Darwin J Operario; Lindsey A Criswell; Michael F Seldin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Putative ancestral origins of chromosomal segments in individual african americans: implications for admixture mapping.

Authors:  Michael F Seldin; Takanobu Morii; Heather E Collins-Schramm; Bill Chima; Rick Kittles; Lindsey A Criswell; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.