Literature DB >> 21610749

Finding disease genes: a fast and flexible approach for analyzing high-throughput data.

William C L Stewart1, Esther N Drill, David A Greenberg.   

Abstract

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) is the non-random distribution of alleles across the genome, and it can create serious problems for modern linkage studies. In particular, computational feasibility is often obtained at the expense of power, precision, and/or accuracy. In our new approach, we combine linkage results over multiple marker subsets to provide fast, efficient, and robust analyses, without compromising power, precision, or accuracy. Allele frequencies and LD in the densely spaced markers are used to construct subsamples that are highly informative for linkage. We have tested our approach extensively, and implemented it in the software package EAGLET (Efficient Analysis of Genetic Linkage: Estimation and Testing). Relative to several commonly used methods we show that EAGLET has increased power to detect disease genes across a range of trait models, LD patterns, and family structures using both simulated and real data. In particular, when the underlying LD pattern is derived from real data, we find that EAGLET outperforms several commonly used linkage methods. In-depth analysis of family data, simulated with linkage and under the real-data derived LD pattern, showed that EAGLET had 78.1% power to detect a dominant disease with incomplete penetrance, whereas the method that uses one marker per cM had 69.7% power, and the cluster-based approach implemented in MERLIN had 76.7% power. In this same setting, EAGLET was three times faster than MERLIN, and it narrowed the MERLIN-based confidence interval for trait location by 29%. Overall, EAGLET gives researchers a fast, accurate, and powerful new tool for analyzing high-throughput linkage data, and large extended families are easily accommodated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21610749      PMCID: PMC3190261          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  25 in total

1.  Ignoring linkage disequilibrium among tightly linked markers induces false-positive evidence of linkage for affected sib pair analysis.

Authors:  Qiqing Huang; Sanjay Shete; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Handling marker-marker linkage disequilibrium: pedigree analysis with clustered markers.

Authors:  Gonçalo R Abecasis; Janis E Wigginton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  SNPLINK: multipoint linkage analysis of densely distributed SNP data incorporating automated linkage disequilibrium removal.

Authors:  Emily L Webb; Gabrielle S Sellick; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Multipoint linkage analysis for a very dense set of markers.

Authors:  Silviu-Alin Bacanu
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Linkage analysis with dense SNP maps in isolated populations.

Authors:  Céline Bellenguez; Carole Ober; Catherine Bourgain
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 0.444

6.  Genome scanning for linkage: an overview.

Authors:  A S Whittemore
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Mapping of DNA markers linked to the cystic fibrosis locus on the long arm of chromosome 7.

Authors:  S Zengerling; L C Tsui; K H Grzeschik; K Olek; J R Riordan; M Buchwald
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Localization of a susceptibility gene for type 2 diabetes to chromosome 5q34-q35.2.

Authors:  Inga Reynisdottir; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Rafn Benediktsson; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Valur Emilsson; Anna Sigurlin Einarsdottir; Eyrun Edda Hjorleifsdottir; Gudbjorg Th Orlygsdottir; Gudrun Thora Bjornsdottir; Jona Saemundsdottir; Skarphedinn Halldorsson; Soffia Hrafnkelsdottir; Steinunn Bjorg Sigurjonsdottir; Svana Steinsdottir; Mitchell Martin; Jarema P Kochan; Brian K Rhees; Struan F A Grant; Michael L Frigge; Augustine Kong; Vilmundur Gudnason; Kari Stefansson; Jeffrey R Gulcher
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  The characterization of twenty sequenced human genomes.

Authors:  Kimberly Pelak; Kevin V Shianna; Dongliang Ge; Jessica M Maia; Mingfu Zhu; Jason P Smith; Elizabeth T Cirulli; Jacques Fellay; Samuel P Dickson; Curtis E Gumbs; Erin L Heinzen; Anna C Need; Elizabeth K Ruzzo; Abanish Singh; C Ryan Campbell; Linda K Hong; Katharina A Lornsen; Alexander M McKenzie; Nara L M Sobreira; Julie E Hoover-Fong; Joshua D Milner; Ruth Ottman; Barton F Haynes; James J Goedert; David B Goldstein
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Analysis of high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism data: three novel methods that control for linkage disequilibrium between markers in a linkage analysis.

Authors:  Kristina Allen-Brady; Benjamin D Horne; Alka Malhotra; Craig Teerlink; Nicola J Camp; Alun Thomas
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2007-12-18
View more
  5 in total

1.  Obtaining accurate p values from a dense SNP linkage scan.

Authors:  William C L Stewart; Ryan L Subaran
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 2.  How should we be searching for genes for common epilepsy? A critique and a prescription.

Authors:  David A Greenberg; William C L Stewart
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.864

3.  Increasing the power of association studies with affected families, unrelated cases and controls.

Authors:  William C L Stewart; Jane Cerise
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Next-generation linkage and association methods applied to hypertension: a multifaceted approach to the analysis of sequence data.

Authors:  William Cl Stewart; Yungui Huang; David A Greenberg; Veronica J Vieland
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2014-06-17

5.  A powerful test of independent assortment that determines genome-wide significance quickly and accurately.

Authors:  W C L Stewart; V R Hager
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.821

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.