Literature DB >> 20028503

Prognostic impact of H3K27me3 expression on locoregional progression after chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Li-Ru He1, Meng-Zhong Liu, Bin-Kui Li, Hui-Lan Rao, Yi-Ji Liao, Xin-Yuan Guan, Yi-Xin Zeng, Dan Xie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27me3) by enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is an epigenetic mark that mediates gene silencing. EZH2 is overexpressed and correlates with poor prognosis in many cancers. However, the clinical implication of H3K27me3 in human malignancies has not been well established. We wished to ascertain whether a correlation exists between the expression of H3K27me3 and clinical outcome in a group of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
METHODS: The method of immunohistochemistry (IHC) was utilized to examine the protein expression of H3K27me3 in 98 pretreatment biopsy specimens of ESCC and in 30 samples of normal esophageal mucosa. The clinical/prognostic significance of H3K27me3 expression was statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: The expression frequency and expression levels of H3K27me3 were significantly higher in ESCCs than in normal tissues. There was a positive correlation between H3K27me3 expression and WHO grade (P = 0.016), tumor size (P = 0.019), T status (P = 0.024), locoregional progression (P = 0.009) and EZH2 expression (P = 0.036). High H3K27me3 expression was associated with poor locoregional progression-free survival (LPFS) (P = 0.010) in ESCC. Further analysis demonstrated that H3K27me3 could stratify patient outcome in T2-3 (P = 0.048), N0 (P = 0.005) and M0 (P = 0.018) stages as well as in CRT effective group (P = 0.022).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that H3K27me3 expression examined by IHC might be useful for stratifying LPFS for different subsets of ESCC patients treated with definitive CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20028503      PMCID: PMC2804715          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is an aggressive human cancer with poor prognosis worldwide [1]. Most patients present with locally advanced disease, and definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is an important component of the therapeutic strategy for ESCC [2]. Despite the great advances achieved in radiotherapy technology recently, its overall 5-year survival rate remains less than 30%, and the high probability of recurrence is still the main cause of poor quality of life and death [3]. At present, only the stage based on Tumor Node Metastases (TNM) classification and primary complete response to CRT are widely accepted as prognostic factors [4]. However, there are substantial differences in survival within patients with the same clinical stage and/or CRT response, probably attributable to the differences in biologic behavior of the tumors. Improved prognostic markers that can further stratify patient outcome are therefore needed. It is known that epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation and covalent histone modification, are involved in tumorigenesis and tumor progression of human cancers [5,6]. One of the most important mechanisms is that many cancer-related genes are silenced by the enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), which can specially trimethylate lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27) of the target gene promoters [7]. EZH2 is overexpressed and correlates with poor prognosis in many cancers [8-13], however, the status of H3K27 methylation and its clinical implication in cancer patients are rarely studied. To date, the role of trimethylated H3K27 (H3K27me3) expression in patient outcome for different types of human cancer is still elusive [8,14,15], further investigations in different cohorts of cancer patients are actually needed. Thus, we performed the present study to investigate the clinical/prognostic implication of H3K27me3 in ESCC patients treated with definitive CRT.

Methods

Patients and tissue specimens

Ninety-eight primary ESCC patients treated with definitive CRT were consecutively selected from the Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University between January 2002 and December 2008. Tumor grade and stage were defined according to the 6th edition of the TNM classification of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC, 2002). Clinicopathologic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Patients with distant metastases except for supraclavicular or celiac lymph nodes were excluded from this study. All the patients received the same PF regimen (Cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. drip day 1, 28; 5-fluorouracil 3 g/m2 c.i.v. day 1 to 2, 28 to 29) concurrently with radiotherapy (60-70 Gy, 1.8-2 Gy/fraction, 5 days a week). The tumor biopsy specimens were recruited from paraffin blocks of the 98 primary ESCCs from the Department of Pathology of our institutes. In addition, 30 biopsy samples of normal esophageal mucosa from the same patients from regions that were not affected were used for controls. The study was approved by the medical ethics committee of our institute.
Table 1

H3K27me3 expression and clinicopathologic variables (Chi-square test)

H3K27me3 expression (%)

VariablesCaselowhighP
Age (years)0.255
 ≤55a5432(59.3)22(40.7)
 >554421(47.7)23(52.3)
Gender0.720
 Male8245(54.9)37(45.1)
 Female168(50.0)8(50.0)
Location0.341
 Cervical2415(62.5)9(37.5)
 Thoracic7438(51.4)36(48.6)
WHO grade0.016
 G12416(66.7)8(33.3)
 G25030(60.0)20(40.0)
 G3-4247(29.2)17(70.8)
Tumor size (cm)0.019
 ≤6b5636(64.3)20(35.7)
 >64217(40.5)25(59.5)
T status0.024
 T2-34731(66.0)16(34.0)
 T45122(43.1)29(56.9)
N status0.929
 N0168(50.0)8(50.0)
 N18240(48.8)42(51.2)
M status0.651
 M05933(55.9)26(44.1)
 M1-lymc3920(51.3)19(48.7)
CRT response0.094
 Effective6137(60.7)24(39.3)
 Resistant3716(43.2)21(56.8)
Locoregional progression0.009
 Absent5134(66.7)17(33.3)
 Present4719(40.4)28(59.6)
Distant progression0.299
 Absent6236(58.1)26(41.9)
 Present3617(47.2)19(52.8)

aMean age. bMean tumor size. cDistant lymph node metastasis.

H3K27me3 expression and clinicopathologic variables (Chi-square test) aMean age. bMean tumor size. cDistant lymph node metastasis.

Evaluation and follow-up

The effect of CRT was evaluated clinically for primary lesions based on esophagography and computed tomography (CT) 4 weeks after CRT according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), no change (NC), and progressive disease (PD) were achieved in 19 patients, 42 patients, 36 patients and 1 patient, respectively. Thus, 61 cases were included in the effective group (CR/PR), the remaining 37 cases were included in the resistant group (NC/PD). The patients were followed every 3 month for the first year and then every 6 months for the next 2 years, and finally annually. Of the 79 patients who didn't get CR, 22 cases received adjuvant chemotherapy, 2 cases received radical esophagectomy. The other patients didn't receive any anti-tumor treatments until tumor progression. The diagnostic examinations consisted of esophagography, CT, chest x-ray, abdominal ultrasonography and bone scan when necessary to detect recurrence and/or metastasis. Locoregional progression was defined as cases in which the primary tumor and regional enlarged lymph nodes evaluated as PD after CRT or recurrence after CR. Distant progression was defined as a failure control of the distant metastatic lymph nodes and/or a new distant metastasis occurred.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

IHC staining was performed on 5-μm tissue sections rehydrated through graded alcohols. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min. For antigen retrieval, tissue slides were boiled in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and microwave-treated for 10 min (H3K27me3), or in tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane-EDTA buffer (pH 8.0) in a pressure cooker for 12 min (EZH2). Nonspecific binding was blocked with 10% normal rabbit serum for 20 min. The tissue slides were incubated with anti-H3K27me3 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, 1:50 dilution) or anti-EZH2 (BD Transduction Laboratories, Franklin Lakes, NJ, 1:100 dilution) for 60 min at 37°C in a moist chamber. Subsequently, the slides were sequentially incubated with biotinylated rabbit antimouse immunoglobulin at a concentration of 1:100 for 30 min at 37°C and then reacted with a streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate for 30 min at 37°C and 3'-3' diaminobenzidine as a chromogen substrate. The nucleus was counterstained using Meyer's hematoxylin. A negative control was obtained by replacing the primary antibody with a normal murine IgG. Positive expression of H3K27me3 and EZH2 in ESCC and normal esophageal mucosa cells was primarily a nuclear pattern (Fig. 1). Known immunostaining positive slides were used as positive controls.
Figure 1

Immunohistochemical stainings of H3K27me3 in human esophageal tissues. (A) A normal esophageal mucosa (case 13) showed low expression of H3K27me3 protein, in which less than 50% of normal esophageal squamous cells showed positive staining of H3K27me3 in nuclei (200×). (B) An ESCC case (case 21) demonstrated low expression of H3K27me3, in which less than 50% of squamous cell carcinoma cells showed positive staining of H3K27me3 protein in nuclei (200×). (C) High expression of H3K27me3 was observed in an ESCC (case 39), where more than 70% carcinoma cells demonstrated positive staining of H3K27me3 in nuclei (200×). (D) A primary ESCC (case 52) was observed high expression of H3K27me3, where more than 90% carcinoma cells showed positive staining of H3K27me3 protein in nuclei (200×). (E) Another ESCC (case 7) was observed high expression of EZH2, where more than 90% of carcinoma cells showed positive staining of EZH2 protein in nuclei (400×). (F) High expression of H3K27me3 (more than 80% of carcinoma cells showed positive expression of H3K27me3) was observed in the same ESCC case 7 (400×). (G) For the 53 ESCC cases with high EZH2 expression, an average of 55.0% of the ESCC cells stained positive with H3K27me3 antibody, a percentage of cancer cells that was significantly larger than that (43.3%) in the remaining 45 cancers with a low expression of EZH2 (P = 0.036, independent sample t test).

Immunohistochemical stainings of H3K27me3 in human esophageal tissues. (A) A normal esophageal mucosa (case 13) showed low expression of H3K27me3 protein, in which less than 50% of normal esophageal squamous cells showed positive staining of H3K27me3 in nuclei (200×). (B) An ESCC case (case 21) demonstrated low expression of H3K27me3, in which less than 50% of squamous cell carcinoma cells showed positive staining of H3K27me3 protein in nuclei (200×). (C) High expression of H3K27me3 was observed in an ESCC (case 39), where more than 70% carcinoma cells demonstrated positive staining of H3K27me3 in nuclei (200×). (D) A primary ESCC (case 52) was observed high expression of H3K27me3, where more than 90% carcinoma cells showed positive staining of H3K27me3 protein in nuclei (200×). (E) Another ESCC (case 7) was observed high expression of EZH2, where more than 90% of carcinoma cells showed positive staining of EZH2 protein in nuclei (400×). (F) High expression of H3K27me3 (more than 80% of carcinoma cells showed positive expression of H3K27me3) was observed in the same ESCC case 7 (400×). (G) For the 53 ESCC cases with high EZH2 expression, an average of 55.0% of the ESCC cells stained positive with H3K27me3 antibody, a percentage of cancer cells that was significantly larger than that (43.3%) in the remaining 45 cancers with a low expression of EZH2 (P = 0.036, independent sample t test). Two independent observers blinded to the clinicopathologic information performed the scoring of H3K27me3 [14,15] and EZH2 [16-18] expression using their previously validated scoring systems respectively. For H3K27me3, the system calculated the percentage of nuclei staining positive for the H3K27me3 protein as close as to the multiples of 10. Since the frequency for the percentage of positively stained cells in all tumor samples assessed for H3K27me3 was almost a normal distribution with a range from 0% to 100%, and the median value was 50%, thus, categories of high and low expression were defined as groups with percentage of positive cells above or below/equal to 50% [14,15]. For EZH2, the system scores nuclear EZH2 expression by recording the percentage of nuclei staining positive for the EZH2 protein, in which EZH2 immunoreactivity was classified into two groups: low expression, when positive cells were less than 50%; and high expression, when at least 50% of the cells showed positive immunoreactivity in the nuclei [16-18]. In this study, a minimum of 500 epithelial cells was counted for each normal or tumor case.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS software (SPSS Standard version 13.0, SPSS Inc.). The association of H3K27me3 expression with ESCC patient's clinicopathologic features was assessed by the Chi-square test. Locoregional progression-free survival (LPFS) was defined as the time from diagnosis to tumor locoregional progression (the first end-point) or cancer-relative death (the second end-point). Disease-specific survival (DSS) was defined as the time from diagnosis to cancer-relative death. LPFS and DDS were assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log rank test. Multivariate survival analysis was performed on all the parameters that were found to be significant on univariate analysis using the Cox regression model. An independent sample t test was used to assess the expression of H3K27me3 between groups with low and high expression of EZH2. P values of < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Expression of H3K27me3 in ESCC

In the present study, protein expression of H3K27me3 was examined by IHC in 98 cases of primary ESCC and in 30 cases of normal esophageal mucosa. H3K27me3 was detected in 85.7% (84/98) of ESCCs, whereas in normal esophageal tissues the expression of H3K27me3 (19/30) was significantly lower (63.3%, P = 0.007). Using the criteria described above, high expression of H3K27me3 was observed in 45.9% (45/98) of the ESCCs and only 20.0% (6/30) of the normal esophageal tissues (P = 0.011). The association between clinicopathologic features and H3K27me3 expression levels of the 98 ESCCs were summarized in Table 1. The expression of H3K27me3 correlated closely with WHO grade (P = 0.016), tumor size (P = 0.019) and T status (P = 0.024). No significant association was found between CRT response and H3K27me3 expression (P = 0.094) or any clinicopathologic variables, such as patient's age, gender and tumor grade, location, size, T status and radiotherapy dose (60GY vs. > 60GY) (P > 0.05).

Correlation between clinicopathologic variables, H3K27me3 expression and ESCC patient survival

Of the 98 ESCC patients, none was lost to follow-up. The median observation period was 23.9 months (2.3-80.7 months), with 47 tumor locoregional progressions, 36 distant progressions and 68 cancer-related deaths. The 5-year LPFS and DSS for the entire cohort of patients were 18.5% and 22.1%, respectively. A positive association between high expression of H3K27me3 and the present of locoregional progression was demonstrated by our Chi-square test (Table 1). In univariate analysis, although there was no significant difference in DSS between groups with high and low expression of H3K27me3 (median 20.0 vs. 22.6 months, P = 0.151), high H3K27me3 expression was evaluated to correlate closely with poor LPFS (P = 0.010) for the ESCC patients (Fig. 2, Table 2). In stratified survival analysis, H3K27me3 expression could differentiate LPFS of the patients in T2-3, N0 and M0 stages, as well as in CRT effective group (Fig. 2, Table 2), however, no stratified significance of H3K27me3 expression was observed in DSS (P > 0.05).
Figure 2

Locoregional progression-free survival curves for total cohort and different subsets of ESCC patients. (A) Total patients, (B) T2-3 subset, (C) T4 subset, (D) N0 subset, (E) N1 subset, (F) M0 subset, (G) M1-lym subset, (H) Chemoradiotherapy effective and (I) chemoradiotherapy resistant subsets: low expression (dashed line), high expression (solid line).

Table 2

Univariate analysis of H3K27me3 for LPFS (log-rank test)

LPFS (months)

VariablesCaseMeanMedianP-value
Total0.010
 Low expression5333.520.6
 High expression4519.410.4
T status
 T2-30.048
  Low expression3139.433.1
  High expression1625.920.0
 T40.224
  Low expression2223.69.7
  High expression2912.98.6
N status
 N00.005
  Low expression862.5NRa
  High expression811.97.4
 N10.230
  Low expression4026.213.6
  High expression4220.512.7
M status
 M00.018
  Low expression3340.829.5
  High expression2622.610.4
 M1-lym0.117
  Low expression2020.514.7
  High expression1913.49.9
CRT response
 Effective0.022
  Low expression3740.229.6
  High expression2424.014.1
 Resistant0.715
  Low expression1614.98.6
 High expression2112.68.5

a Not reached.

Locoregional progression-free survival curves for total cohort and different subsets of ESCC patients. (A) Total patients, (B) T2-3 subset, (C) T4 subset, (D) N0 subset, (E) N1 subset, (F) M0 subset, (G) M1-lym subset, (H) Chemoradiotherapy effective and (I) chemoradiotherapy resistant subsets: low expression (dashed line), high expression (solid line). Univariate analysis of H3K27me3 for LPFS (log-rank test) a Not reached. Kaplan-Meier analysis also demonstrated a significant impact of certain clinicopathologic prognostic parameters such as T status (P = 0.002), CRT response (P 0.001) and M-lym status (P = 0.043) on LPFS. No significant association was found between survival and other clinicopathologic variables, including radiotherapy dose and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or not (P > 0.05). The parameters that were significant in univariate analysis were further examined in multivariate analysis. The results showed that T status, CRT response and M-lym status were independent predictors of LPFS, while H3K27me3 expression only showed a borderline significance (P = 0.065, Table 3).
Table 3

Multivariate Cox regression analysis for LPFS

LPFS

VariableHRa(95% CIb)P
H3K27me3 expression0.065
 Low1.000
 High1.568 (0.972-2.528)
CRT response0.023
 Effective1.000
 Resistant1.820 (1.084-3.055)
T status0.013
 T2-31.000
 T41.376 (1.068-1.772)
M status0.029
 M01.000
 M1-lym1.721 (1.056-2.806)

aHazard ratio. bConfidence interval.

Multivariate Cox regression analysis for LPFS aHazard ratio. bConfidence interval.

Correlation between the expression of H3K27me3 and EZH2 in ESCCs

Using the criteria described above, high expression of EZH2 was observed in 53/98 (54.1%) of the ESCCs (Fig. 1F) , the other 45 cases showed low expression of EZH2 (datas in submission). Thus, we further evaluated the relationship between the expression of H3K27me3 and EZH2. The results showed a positive correlation between the expression levels of H3K27me3 and EZH2. In the 53 ESCC cases with high EZH2 expression, an average of 55.0% of the ESCC cells stained positively with H3K27me3 antibody, a percentage of cancer cells that was significantly larger than that (43.3%) in the remaining 45 cancers with a low expression of EZH2 (P = 0.036, Fig. 1G).

Discussion

Since ESCC patients with the same TNM stage and/or CRT response often display considerable variability in disease progression and survival, the traditional grading system may have reached its limits in providing critical information influencing patient prognosis and treatment strategies. Thus, novel diagnostic and risk assessment are urgently needed. Recently, histone modification, which is important for normal cell growth, has become an increasingly important aspect of cancer biology [6,19-21]. One such modification, the trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27me3) is required for Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) mediated repression of a large number of genes essential for cell proliferation, cell differentiation and tumor development [22,23]. It is believed that maintenance of the H3K27me3 mark during cell division is essential for normal embryogenesis and for preserving cell identity [24,25]. In human cancer, H3K27me3 has been evaluated as a prognostic factor in prostate, breast, ovarian, pancreatic and esophageal cancers [8,14,15], however, some of the results are totally contradictory. In the present study, we examined the expression of H3K27me3, in 30 samples of normal esophageal mucosa and 98 biopsy specimens of primary ESCCs treated with definitive CRT. Our results showed that a significant percentage of the normal esophageal mucosa was observed positive staining of H3K27me3. However, the frequency of positive expression and levels of H3K27me3 in our ESCC cohorts were significant higher than that in normal esophageal tissues. Further analysis demonstrated that high expression of H3K27me3 was associated closely with poor tumor differentiation and advanced local invasion in ESCC, which was in general agreement with findings revealed by Ching et al [15]. In addition, we did further found that H3K27me3 expression correlated significantly with tumor locoregional progression rather than distant metastasis. These findings provide evidence that the up-regulation of H3K27me3 may provide a selective advantage for carcinogenesis and tumor progression of ESCC. When focus on locoregional progression-free survival (LPFS) of ESCC, we found that high expression of H3K27me3 correlated with poor prognosis. Furthermore, the difference in H3K27me3 expression levels was evaluated to be a better predictor of LPFS when patients are stratified on the basis of T, N, M status and CRT response. It has been revealed that H3K27 methylation was mediated by the primary H3K27 methyltransferase, EZH2, a component of the Polycomb (PcG) complex that is involved in early carcinogenesis [26]. As aforementioned, our results showed that H3K27me3 predicted LPFS predominately in T2-3, N0 and M0 stages of ESCC may partly support the link between PcG complex and H3K27me3 in early carcinogenesis. Similar results were also reported in surgical treated ESCC patients by Ching et al [15]. In our CRT treated ESCC cohort, we further demonstrated that H3K27me3 could better stratify LPFS for CRT effective patients. In addition, ESCC patients with high expression of H3K27me3 were more likely to present with large tumor size and advanced T status; such may be at higher risk to suffer from tumor progression after CRT. Thus, our findings might be helpful to better understand the heterogeneity in the prognosis of ESCC patients within the same stages and even with a good response to CRT. Considering the potentially important role of H3K27me3 as a biological mechanism in locoregional progression of ESCC, the examination of H3K27me3 expression by IHC, therefore, might be used as an additional tool in risk assessment and therapy optimizing. With regards to the biologic function of H3K27me3, it has been observed that, H3K27me3 was linked to PcG-mediated suppression of homeotic box (Hox) genes and maintenance of embryonic stem cell identity [27], whereas during embryogenesis and stem cell differentiation, consistent with the strong decrease in H3K27me3 levels associated with HOX genes expression, the level of EZH2 also declined [28,29]. Our results supported the role of H3K27me3 in cell differentiation of ESCC. Since methylation of H3K27 mediated by EZH2 has been implicated in the aggressive phenotype of cancer cells through repression of a panel of tumor suppression genes [30,31], the loss of function of these genes, in turn, locks stem/precursor cells into abnormal clonal expansion which begins a process of neoplastic initiation [32,33]. This might provide a possible explanation for the association of H3K27me3 expression and local invasion in ESCC found by our study. Moreover, an imbalance of H3K27 methylation owing to overexpression of EZH2 has been implicated in metastatic prostate and aggressive breast cancers [8,9], in which a highly significant overlap between PRC2- and H3K27me3-occupied genes was observed [8]. To determine whether there was a potential correlation between the expression of EZH2 and H3K27me3 in ESCC, we evaluated the expression status of the two proteins by IHC in the same cohort of cases. Our results demonstrated that the expression level of H3K27me3 in high EZH2 expression group was significantly higher than that in low EZH2 expression group, which supported the view that up-regulated expression of H3K27me3 in ESCCs might be caused, at least partly, by increased expression of EZH2. In other types of human cancer, in contrast, Wei et al reported that loss of H3K27me3 correlated with poor prognosis of patients with breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers, in which no association was observed between expression of H3K27me3 and EZH2 [14]. Considering that the mechanism by which EZH2-mediated H3K27 methylation leads to gene silencing may vary among gene targets and among organisms [34], discrepancies in different studies may arise. In addition, recent studies demonstrate that the H3K27me3 mark is more dynamic than previously anticipated and suggest that the levels of H3K27me3 is fine-tuned by opposing activities: demethylases and the PRC2 complex [27,35]. These results, collectively, suggested that the regulation of H3K27me3 expression is quite complicated and its biologic/clinical significance in different human cancers may be tissue-specific. Clearly, further investigations are substantially needed.

Conclusion

In summary, in this study, we describe protein expression of H3K27me3 and its correlation with EZH2 expression in normal human esophageal tissues and in ESCCs. Our results provided, for the first time, a basis for the concept that high expression of H3K27me3, as detected by IHC, might be useful for stratifying LPFS for different subsets of ESCC patients treated with definitive CRT.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

LRH evaluated the clinical records, carried out the immunohistochemistry assays and drafted the manuscript. MZL designed the study and participated in its coordination. BKL participated in the statistical analysis and help to draft the manuscript. HLR performed the immunohistochemical analyses. YJL help to carry out the immunohistochemistry assays. XYG, YXZ and DX participated in the design of the study, in its analysis and in the interpretation of the data. DX also participated in evaluated the immunohistochemistry results and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/9/461/prepub
  32 in total

1.  EZH2, Ki-67 and MCM7 are prognostic markers in prostatectomy treated patients.

Authors:  Sari Laitinen; Paula M Martikainen; Teemu Tolonen; Jorma Isola; Teuvo L J Tammela; Tapio Visakorpi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  A histone H3 lysine 27 demethylase regulates animal posterior development.

Authors:  Fei Lan; Peter E Bayliss; John L Rinn; Johnathan R Whetstine; Jordon K Wang; Shuzhen Chen; Shigeki Iwase; Roman Alpatov; Irina Issaeva; Eli Canaani; Thomas M Roberts; Howard Y Chang; Yang Shi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A model for transmission of the H3K27me3 epigenetic mark.

Authors:  Klaus H Hansen; Adrian P Bracken; Diego Pasini; Nikolaj Dietrich; Simmi S Gehani; Astrid Monrad; Juri Rappsilber; Mads Lerdrup; Kristian Helin
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 4.  Importance of Ezh2 polycomb protein in tumorigenesis process interfering with the pathway of growth suppressive key elements.

Authors:  Tiziana Tonini; Giuseppina D'Andrilli; Alfredo Fucito; Leonardo Gaspa; Luigi Bagella
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.384

5.  Loss of trimethylation at lysine 27 of histone H3 is a predictor of poor outcome in breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers.

Authors:  Yongkun Wei; Weiya Xia; Zhihong Zhang; Jinsong Liu; Huamin Wang; Nazmi V Adsay; Constance Albarracin; Dihua Yu; James L Abbruzzese; Gordon B Mills; Robert C Bast; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Mien-Chie Hung
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.784

Review 6.  Cancer as a manifestation of aberrant chromatin structure.

Authors:  Malcolm V Brock; James G Herman; Stephen B Baylin
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

7.  Loss of histone H4K20 trimethylation occurs in preneoplasia and influences prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Arnaud Van Den Broeck; Elisabeth Brambilla; Denis Moro-Sibilot; Sylvie Lantuejoul; Christian Brambilla; Beatrice Eymin; Sylvie Gazzeri
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Bivalent domains enforce transcriptional memory of DNA methylated genes in cancer cells.

Authors:  Jairo Rodriguez; Mar Muñoz; Laura Vives; Costas G Frangou; Mark Groudine; Miguel A Peinado
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Roles of the EZH2 histone methyltransferase in cancer epigenetics.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Simon; Carol A Lange
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Role of hPHF1 in H3K27 methylation and Hox gene silencing.

Authors:  Ru Cao; Hengbin Wang; Jin He; Hediye Erdjument-Bromage; Paul Tempst; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  22 in total

1.  Low expression of IGFBP-3 predicts poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Li-Ru He; Rui Zhang; Mu-Yan Cai; Yi-Ji Liao; Dong Qian; Mian Xi; Yi-Xin Zeng; Dan Xie; Meng-Zhong Liu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Global histone post-translational modifications and cancer: Biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment?

Authors:  Shafqat Ali Khan; Divya Reddy; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-11-26

3.  Clinical significance of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 and histone deacetylases 1 and 2 expression in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Huilai Zhang; Huijuan Lv; Xiaohui Jia; Ge Hu; Lingzhe Kong; Tingting Zhang; Linyu Li; Yi Pan; Qiongli Zhai; Bin Meng; Xi Wang; Huaqing Wang; Xianhuo Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Chemical profiling of the genome with anti-cancer drugs defines target specificities.

Authors:  Baoxu Pang; Johann de Jong; Xiaohang Qiao; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Jacques Neefjes
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 15.040

5.  H3K27me3 protein is a promising predictive biomarker of patients' survival and chemoradioresistance in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Mu-Yan Cai; Zhu-Ting Tong; Wei Zhu; Zhu-Zhi Wen; Hui-Lan Rao; Ling-Ling Kong; Xin-Yuan Guan; Hsiang-Fu Kung; Yi-Xin Zeng; Dan Xie
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 6.354

6.  Increased HIF-1alpha expression in tumor cells and lymphocytes of tumor microenvironments predicts unfavorable survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; Shu-Biao Ye; Ze-Lei Li; Gang Ma; Shi-Ping Chen; Jia He; Wan-Li Liu; Dan Xie; Yi-Xin Zeng; Jiang Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-06-15

7.  H3K27 trimethylation and H3K9 dimethylation as poor prognostic markers for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Shaofeng Lin; Menghan Zhou; Yiping Li; Yanping Chen; Weizhang Xu; Wenjia Xia; Siwei Wang; Rong Yin; Qin Zhang; Lin Xu; Hong Fan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2019-07-01

8.  Overexpression of Histone H3 Lysine 27 Trimethylation Is Associated with Aggressiveness and Dedifferentiation of Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Chia-Chi Tsai; Ming-Nan Chien; Yuan-Ching Chang; Jie-Jen Lee; Shuen-Han Dai; Shih-Ping Cheng
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.943

9.  High expression of H3K27me3 in human hepatocellular carcinomas correlates closely with vascular invasion and predicts worse prognosis in patients.

Authors:  Mu-Yan Cai; Jing-Hui Hou; Hui-Lan Rao; Rong-Zhen Luo; Mei Li; Xiao-Qing Pei; Marie C Lin; Xin-Yuan Guan; Hsiang-Fu Kung; Yi-Xin Zeng; Dan Xie
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 10.  Common features of chromatin in aging and cancer: cause or coincidence?

Authors:  Linda Zane; Vivek Sharma; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 20.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.