Literature DB >> 20023098

Prolonged survival of Campylobacter species in bovine manure compost.

G Douglas Inglis1, Tim A McAllister, Francis J Larney, Edward Topp.   

Abstract

The persistence of naturally occurring campylobacteria in aerobic compost constructed of manure from beef cattle that were administered chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine (AS700) or from cattle not administered antibiotics (control) was examined. Although there were no differences in population sizes of heterotrophic bacteria, the temperature of AS700 compost was more variable and did not become as high as that of control compost. There were significant differences in water content, total carbon (C), total nitrogen (N), and electrical conductivity but not in the C/N ratio or pH between the two compost treatments. Campylobacteria were readily isolated from pen manure, for up to day 15 from control compost, and throughout the active phase of AS700 compost. Campylobacter DNA (including Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter fetus, Campylobacter hyointestinalis, and Campylobacter jejuni) was detected over the ca. 10-month composting period, and no reductions in quantities of C. jejuni DNA were observed over the duration of the active phase. The utilization of centrifugation in combination with ethidium monoazide (EMA) significantly reduced (>90%) the amplification of C. jejuni DNA that did not originate from cells with intact cell membranes. No differences were observed in the frequency of Campylobacter DNA detection between EMA- and non-EMA-treated samples, suggesting that Campylobacter DNA amplified from compost was extracted from cells with intact cell membranes (i.e., from viable cells). The findings of this study indicate that campylobacteria excreted in cattle feces persist for long periods in compost and call into question the common belief that these bacteria do not persist in manure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20023098      PMCID: PMC2820969          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01902-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  31 in total

1.  Survival of bacterial pathogens during the thermophilic anaerobic digestion of biowaste: laboratory experiments and in situ validation.

Authors:  Andreas Otto Wagner; Gudrun Gstraunthaler; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.331

2.  Survival of pathogenic bacteria during mesophilic anaerobic digestion of animal waste.

Authors:  T E Kearney; M J Larkin; J P Frost; P N Levett
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1993-09

3.  Comparison of fecal samples collected per rectum and off the ground for estimation of environmental contamination attributable to beef cattle.

Authors:  B R Hoar; E R Atwill; C Elmi; W W Utterback; A J Edmondson
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.156

4.  The fate of the recombinant DNA in corn during composting.

Authors:  Jiewen Guan; J Lloyd Spencer; Bao-Luo Ma
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health B       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Use of ethidium monoazide and PCR in combination for quantification of viable and dead cells in complex samples.

Authors:  Knut Rudi; Birgitte Moen; Signe Marie Drømtorp; Askild L Holck
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Management of antibiotic residues from agricultural sources: use of composting to reduce chlortetracycline residues in beef manure from treated animals.

Authors:  Osman A Arikan; Walter Mulbry; Clifford Rice
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 10.588

7.  Strain-dependent variability in growth and survival of Escherichia coli in agricultural soil.

Authors:  Edward Topp; Martha Welsh; Yuan-Ching Tien; Angela Dang; George Lazarovits; Kenneth Conn; Hong Zhu
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 4.194

8.  The effect of slurry storage and anaerobic digestion on survival of pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  T E Kearney; M J Larkin; P N Levett
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1993-01

9.  Unsuitable distinction between viable and dead Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis by ethidium bromide monoazide.

Authors:  H Kobayashi; M Oethinger; M J Tuohy; G S Hall; T W Bauer
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.858

10.  Purification of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplifiable DNA from compost piles containing bovine mortalities.

Authors:  Tim Reuter; Weiping Xu; Trevor W Alexander; Kim Stanford; Yongping Xu; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 9.642

View more
  16 in total

1.  Emission Sources of Campylobacter from Agricultural Farms, Impact on Environmental Contamination and Intervention Strategies.

Authors:  Vanessa Szott; Anika Friese
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Campylobacter jejuni Strains Associated with Wild Birds and Those Causing Human Disease in Six High-Use Recreational Waterways in New Zealand.

Authors:  Rima D Shrestha; Anne C Midwinter; Jonathan C Marshall; Julie M Collins-Emerson; Eve J Pleydell; Nigel P French
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Catheterization of intestinal loops in ruminants does not adversely affect loop function.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; John P Kastelic; Richard R E Uwiera
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.982

4.  Subtype-Specific Selection for Resistance to Fluoroquinolones but Not to Tetracyclines Is Evident in Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Beef Cattle in Confined Feeding Operations in Southern Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Andrew L Webb; L Brent Selinger; Eduardo N Taboada; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  The clinical importance of emerging Campylobacter species.

Authors:  Si Ming Man
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Hyperendemic Campylobacter jejuni in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) raised for food in a semi-rural community of Quito, Ecuador.

Authors:  Jay P Graham; Karla Vasco; Gabriel Trueba
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.541

7.  Clinically Relevant Campylobacter jejuni Subtypes Are Readily Found and Transmitted within the Cattle Production Continuum but Present a Limited Foodborne Risk.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Jenny F Gusse; Kathaleen E House; Tara G Shelton; Eduardo N Taboada
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Fate and Survival of Campylobacter coli in Swine Manure at Various Temperatures.

Authors:  Xuan Thanh Bui; Anders Wolff; Mogen Madsen; Dang Duong Bang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-26       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Development of a comparative genomic fingerprinting assay for rapid and high resolution genotyping of Arcobacter butzleri.

Authors:  Andrew L Webb; Peter Kruczkiewicz; L Brent Selinger; G Douglas Inglis; Eduardo N Taboada
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 10.  An Overview of the Control of Bacterial Pathogens in Cattle Manure.

Authors:  Christy E Manyi-Loh; Sampson N Mamphweli; Edson L Meyer; Golden Makaka; Michael Simon; Anthony I Okoh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.