Literature DB >> 19416465

Unsuitable distinction between viable and dead Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis by ethidium bromide monoazide.

H Kobayashi1, M Oethinger, M J Tuohy, G S Hall, T W Bauer.   

Abstract

AIMS: The DNA-intercalating dye ethidium bromide monoazide (EMA) has recently been used as a DNA binding agent to differentiate viable and dead bacterial cells by selectively penetrating through the damaged membrane of dead cells and blocking the DNA amplification during the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We optimized and tested the assay in vitro using Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis cultures to distinguish viable from dead bacteria, with the goal of reducing false positive PCR results. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Viable and heat-inactivated bacteria were treated with EMA or left untreated before DNA extraction. A real-time PCR assay for the detection of the tuf gene in each DNA extract was used. Our results indicated that EMA influenced viable bacteria as well as dead bacteria, and the effect of EMA depended on the EMA concentration and bacterial number.
CONCLUSIONS: EMA is not a suitable indicator of bacterial viability, at least with respect to Staphylococcus species. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Determining the viability of pathogens has a major impact on interpreting the results of molecular tests for bacteria and subsequent clinical management of patients. To this end, several methods are being evaluated. One of these methods--intercalating DNA of dead bacteria by EMA--looked very promising, but our study found it unsatisfactory for S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19416465     DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02585.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0266-8254            Impact factor:   2.858


  7 in total

Review 1.  Ecology and exploration of the rare biosphere.

Authors:  Michael D J Lynch; Josh D Neufeld
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Prolonged survival of Campylobacter species in bovine manure compost.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Tim A McAllister; Francis J Larney; Edward Topp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Viable real-time PCR in environmental samples: can all data be interpreted directly?

Authors:  Mariana Fittipaldi; Francesc Codony; Barbara Adrados; Anne K Camper; Jordi Morató
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Phage-protease-peptide: a novel trifecta enabling multiplex detection of viable bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  S D Alcaine; L Tilton; M A C Serrano; M Wang; R W Vachet; S R Nugen
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  "Limits of control"--crucial parameters for a reliable quantification of viable campylobacter by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Nora-Johanna Krüger; Christiane Buhler; Azuka N Iwobi; Ingrid Huber; Lüppo Ellerbroek; Bernd Appel; Kerstin Stingl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Detection of Legionella, L. pneumophila and Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) along potable water distribution pipelines.

Authors:  Harriet Whiley; Alexandra Keegan; Howard Fallowfield; Richard Bentham
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Molecular viability testing of bacterial pathogens from a complex human sample matrix.

Authors:  Kris M Weigel; Kelly L Jones; Julie S Do; Jody Melton Witt; Jae-Hyun Chung; Christian Valcke; Gerard A Cangelosi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.