Literature DB >> 10566807

Comparison of fecal samples collected per rectum and off the ground for estimation of environmental contamination attributable to beef cattle.

B R Hoar1, E R Atwill, C Elmi, W W Utterback, A J Edmondson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether sampling feces off the ground replicates prevalence estimates for specific pathogens obtained from fecal samples collected per rectum of adult cows, and to determine characteristics of feces on the ground (fecal pats) that are associated with subsequent identification of Campylobacter spp, Cryptosporidium parvum, and Giardia duodenalis. ANIMALS: A random sample of adult beef cattle from 25 herds located throughout California. PROCEDURE: 1,115 rectal and ground fecal samples were obtained. Samples were submitted for culture of Campylobacter spp and examined, using a direct fluorescent antibody assay, to detect C parvum oocysts and G duodenalis cysts. Characteristics of fecal pats, such as volume and consistency, were recorded.
RESULTS: Prevalence of Campylobacter spp was 5.0% (20/401) for rectal fecal samples, which was significantly greater than prevalence determined for ground fecal samples (2/402; 0.5%). Most isolates were C jejuni subsp jejuni. Prevalence of C parvum was higher in rectal fecal samples (6/557; 1.1%) than in ground fecal samples (1/558; 0.2%), but this difference was not significant. Prevalence of G duodenalis did not differ for rectal (36/557; 6.5%) versus ground (26/558; 4.7%) fecal samples. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Evaluation of ground fecal samples may not accurately indicate the prevalence of Campylobacter spp or C parvum in cattle but may reflect prevalence of G duodenalis. Differences in prevalence estimates between the 2 methods suggest inactivation of pathogens in feces after cattle have defecated. Prevalence estimates generated by evaluation of ground fecal samples, however, may more accurately estimate environmental pathogen burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10566807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  8 in total

1.  Dispersion and transport of Cryptosporidium Oocysts from fecal pats under simulated rainfall events.

Authors:  Cheryl M Davies; Christobel M Ferguson; Christine Kaucner; Martin Krogh; Nanda Altavilla; Daniel A Deere; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Transport of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts through vegetated buffer strips and estimated filtration efficiency.

Authors:  Edward R Atwill; Lingling Hou; Betsy M Karle; Thomas Harter; Kenneth W Tate; Randy A Dahlgren
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Prolonged survival of Campylobacter species in bovine manure compost.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Tim A McAllister; Francis J Larney; Edward Topp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Temporal variation and host association in the Campylobacter population in a longitudinal ruminant farm study.

Authors:  Emma L Sproston; Iain D Ogden; Marion MacRae; John F Dallas; Samuel K Sheppard; Alison J Cody; Frances M Colles; Michael J Wilson; Ken J Forbes; Norval J C Strachan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Antibiotic-resistant E. coli in surface water and groundwater in dairy operations in Northern California.

Authors:  Xunde Li; Naoko Watanabe; Chengling Xiao; Thomas Harter; Brenda McCowan; Yingjia Liu; Edward R Atwill
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Prevalence and risk factor investigation of Campylobacter species in beef cattle feces from seven large commercial feedlots in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Sherry J Hannon; Brenda Allan; Cheryl Waldner; Margaret L Russell; Andrew Potter; Lorne A Babiuk; Hugh G G Townsend
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.310

7.  Prevalence and concentration of Campylobacter in faeces of dairy cows: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna-Delia Knipper; Narges Ghoreishi; Tasja Crease
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Methodological comparisons for antimicrobial resistance surveillance in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Katharine M Benedict; Sheryl P Gow; Sylvia Checkley; Calvin W Booker; Tim A McAllister; Paul S Morley
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 2.741

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.