Literature DB >> 11784767

Spectrotemporal receptive fields in the lemniscal auditory thalamus and cortex.

Lee M Miller1, Monty A Escabí, Heather L Read, Christoph E Schreiner.   

Abstract

Receptive fields have been characterized independently in the lemniscal auditory thalamus and cortex, usually with spectrotemporally simple sounds tailored to a specific task. No studies have employed naturalistic stimuli to investigate the thalamocortical transformation in temporal, spectral, and aural domains simultaneously and under identical conditions. We recorded simultaneously in the ventral division of the medial geniculate body (MGBv) and in primary auditory cortex (AI) of the ketamine-anesthetized cat. Spectrotemporal receptive fields (STRFs) of single units (n = 387) were derived by reverse-correlation with a broadband and dynamically varying stimulus, the dynamic ripple. Spectral integration, as measured by excitatory bandwidth and spectral modulation preference, was similar across both stations (mean Q(1/e) thalamus = 5.8, cortex = 5.4; upper cutoff of spectral modulation transfer function, thalamus = 1.30 cycles/octave, cortex = 1.37 cycles/octave). Temporal modulation rates slowed by a factor of two from thalamus to cortex (mean preferred rate, thalamus = 32.4 Hz, cortex = 16.6 Hz; upper cutoff of temporal modulation transfer function, thalamus = 62.9 Hz, cortex = 37.4 Hz). We found no correlation between spectral and temporal integration properties, suggesting that the excitatory-inhibitory interactions underlying preference in each domain are largely independent. A small number of neurons in each station had highly asymmetric STRFs, evidence of frequency sweep selectivity, but the population showed no directional bias. Binaural preferences differed in their relative proportions, most notably an increased prevalence of excitatory contralateral-only cells in cortex (40%) versus thalamus (23%), indicating a reorganization of this parameter. By comparing simultaneously along multiple stimulus dimensions in both stations, these observations establish the global characteristics of the thalamocortical receptive field transformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11784767     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00395.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  136 in total

1.  Nonlinear spectrotemporal sound analysis by neurons in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Monty A Escabi; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A possible role for a paralemniscal auditory pathway in the coding of slow temporal information.

Authors:  Daniel A Abrams; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Dynamics of precise spike timing in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Mounya Elhilali; Jonathan B Fritz; David J Klein; Jonathan Z Simon; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Linearity of cortical receptive fields measured with natural sounds.

Authors:  Christian K Machens; Michael S Wehr; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Frequency modulated sweep responses in the medial geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  B Lui; J R Mendelson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Masking and scrambling in the auditory thalamus of awake rats by Gaussian and modulated noises.

Authors:  Eugene M Martin; Morris F West; Purvis H Bedenbaugh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Characterization of thalamocortical responses of regular-spiking and fast-spiking neurons of the mouse auditory cortex in vitro and in silico.

Authors:  Max L Schiff; Alex D Reyes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Role of the zebra finch auditory thalamus in generating complex representations for natural sounds.

Authors:  Noopur Amin; Patrick Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Glutamatergic inhibition in sensory neocortex.

Authors:  Charles C Lee; S Murray Sherman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Diverse effects of stimulus history in waking mouse auditory cortex.

Authors:  Elizabeth A K Phillips; Christoph E Schreiner; Andrea R Hasenstaub
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.