Literature DB >> 6697084

Acoustic shock generation by ultrasonic imaging equipment.

F A Duck, H C Starritt.   

Abstract

The pulses generated by ultrasonic imaging equipment have been observed to form acoustic shocks in water within a range of a few centimetres under normal operating conditions. The commonly held view of pulse propagation from ultrasonic imaging equipment is that the acoustic pulse has the form of a damped sine wave which will project largely unchanged in waveform. Any waveform changes which do occur result from diffraction effects and from the scattering and attenuation properties of tissue. The theory on which this understanding is based assumes that propagation laws are linear. This paper presents experimental evidence that this assumption is quite invalid at the pressures generated by commercial pulse-echo imaging equipment in common use. Measurements in water of the pulse waveforms using a calibrated broad-band polymer hydrophone have demonstrated that pulse distortion and shock formation commonly occur due to the inherent non-linearity of the propagation medium. This fact must be considered during the calibration of pulse-echo equipment. In addition, the conditions under which shock formation might occur during normal clinical procedures should be reviewed and any associated biological effects assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6697084     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-57-675-231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  3 in total

Review 1.  Measurement and characterisation of the acoustic output of medical ultrasonic equipment. Part 2.

Authors:  R C Preston
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Measurement and characterisation of the acoustic output of medical ultrasonic equipment. Part 1.

Authors:  R C Preston
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Shock-induced heating and millisecond boiling in gels and tissue due to high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael S Canney; Vera A Khokhlova; Olga V Bessonova; Michael R Bailey; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.998

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.