Literature DB >> 19395121

The germline stem cells of Drosophila melanogaster partition DNA non-randomly.

Phillip Karpowicz1, Milena Pellikka, Evelyn Chea, Dorothea Godt, Ulrich Tepass, Derek van der Kooy.   

Abstract

The Immortal Strand Hypothesis proposes that asymmetrically dividing stem cells cosegregate chromatids to retain ancestral DNA templates. Using both pulse-chase and label retention assays, we show that non-random partitioning of DNA occurs in germline stem cells (GSCs) in the Drosophila ovary as these divide asymmetrically to generate a new GSC and a differentiating cystoblast. This process is disrupted when GSCs are forced to differentiate through the overexpression of Bag of Marbles, a factor that impels the terminal differentiation of cystoblasts. When Decapentaplegic, a ligand which maintains the undifferentiated state of GSCs, is expressed ectopically the non-random partitioning of DNA is similarly disrupted. Our data suggest asymmetric chromatid segregation is coupled to mechanisms specifying cellular differentiation via asymmetric stem cell division.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19395121     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0171-9335            Impact factor:   4.492


  16 in total

Review 1.  Stem cell ageing and non-random chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Gregory W Charville; Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  When stem cells grow old: phenotypes and mechanisms of stem cell aging.

Authors:  Michael B Schultz; David A Sinclair
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 3.  Biased segregation of DNA and centrosomes: moving together or drifting apart?

Authors:  Shahragim Tajbakhsh; Cayetano Gonzalez
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  Heterochronic parabiosis for the study of the effects of aging on stem cells and their niches.

Authors:  Irina M Conboy; Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  Discovery of the mitotic selective chromatid segregation phenomenon and its implications for vertebrate development.

Authors:  A Armakolas; M Koutsilieris; A J S Klar
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 8.382

6.  Tumor-initiating label-retaining cancer cells in human gastrointestinal cancers undergo asymmetric cell division.

Authors:  Hong-Wu Xin; Danielle M Hari; John E Mullinax; Chenwi M Ambe; Tomotake Koizumi; Satyajit Ray; Andrew J Anderson; Gordon W Wiegand; Susan H Garfield; Snorri S Thorgeirsson; Itzhak Avital
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.277

7.  Ferreting out stem cells from their niches.

Authors:  Elaine Fuchs; Valerie Horsley
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Identification of sister chromatids by DNA template strand sequences.

Authors:  Ester Falconer; Elizabeth A Chavez; Alexander Henderson; Steven S S Poon; Steven McKinney; Lindsay Brown; David G Huntsman; Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  The mortal strand hypothesis: non-random chromosome inheritance and the biased segregation of damaged DNA.

Authors:  Gregory W Charville; Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 10.  Asymmetric distribution of histones during Drosophila male germline stem cell asymmetric divisions.

Authors:  Vuong Tran; Lijuan Feng; Xin Chen
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.