Literature DB >> 21106827

Retrieval of associative information congruent with prior knowledge is related to increased medial prefrontal activity and connectivity.

Marlieke T R van Kesteren1, Mark Rijpkema, Dirk J Ruiter, Guillén Fernández.   

Abstract

We remember information that is congruent instead of incongruent with prior knowledge better, but the underlying neural mechanisms related to this enhancement are still relatively unknown. Recently, this memory enhancement due to a prior schema has been suggested to be based on rapid neocortical assimilation of new information, related to optimized encoding and consolidation processes. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is thought to be important in mediating this process, but its role in retrieval of schema-consistent information is still unclear. In this study, we regarded multisensory congruency with prior knowledge as a schema and used this factor to probe retrieval of consolidated memories either consistent or inconsistent with prior knowledge. We conducted a visuotactile learning paradigm in which participants studied visual motifs randomly associated with word-fabric combinations that were either congruent or incongruent with common knowledge. The next day, participants were scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging while their memory was tested. Congruent associations were remembered better than incongruent ones. This behavioral finding was parallelized by stronger retrieval-related activity in and connectivity between medial prefrontal and left somatosensory cortex. Moreover, we found a positive across-subject correlation between the connectivity enhancement and the behavioral congruency effect. These results show that successful retrieval of congruent compared to incongruent visuotactile associations is related to enhanced processing in an mPFC-somatosensory network, and support the hypothesis that new information that fits a preexisting schema is more rapidly assimilated in neocortical networks, a process that may be mediated, at least in part, by the mPFC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21106827      PMCID: PMC6633736          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2674-10.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  47 in total

1.  The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: the importance of prior knowledge.

Authors:  E A Maguire; C D Frith; R G Morris
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain.

Authors:  N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  The cognitive neuroscience of remembering.

Authors:  R L Buckner; M E Wheeler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Neuroimaging studies of autobiographical event memory.

Authors:  E A Maguire
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  The cortical distribution of sensory memories.

Authors:  J A Harris; R S Petersen; M E Diamond
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Frontal lobes and human memory: insights from functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  P C Fletcher; R N Henson
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Memory's echo: vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex.

Authors:  M E Wheeler; S E Petersen; R L Buckner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Reactivation of encoding-related brain activity during memory retrieval.

Authors:  L Nyberg; R Habib; A R McIntosh; E Tulving
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Neural correlates for feeling-of-knowing: an fMRI parametric analysis.

Authors:  Hideyuki Kikyo; Kenichi Ohki; Yasushi Miyashita
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  Attending to and remembering tactile stimuli: a review of brain imaging data and single-neuron responses.

Authors:  H Burton; R J Sinclair
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.177

View more
  67 in total

1.  Neural conflict-control mechanisms improve memory for target stimuli.

Authors:  Ruth M Krebs; Carsten N Boehler; Maya De Belder; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  I know I've seen you before: Distinguishing recent-single-exposure-based familiarity from pre-existing familiarity.

Authors:  Sarah I Gimbel; James B Brewer; Anat Maril
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Mnemonic Training Reshapes Brain Networks to Support Superior Memory.

Authors:  Martin Dresler; William R Shirer; Boris N Konrad; Nils C J Müller; Isabella C Wagner; Guillén Fernández; Michael Czisch; Michael D Greicius
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Predictability Changes What We Remember in Familiar Temporal Contexts.

Authors:  Hyojeong Kim; Margaret L Schlichting; Alison R Preston; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Neural mechanisms underlying subsequent memory for personal beliefs:An fMRI study.

Authors:  Erik A Wing; Vijeth Iyengar; Thomas M Hess; Kevin S LaBar; Scott A Huettel; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  A cow on the prairie vs. a cow on the street: long-term consequences of semantic conflict on episodic encoding.

Authors:  Javier Ortiz-Tudela; Bruce Milliken; Fabiano Botta; Mitchell LaPointe; Juan Lupiañez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-16

7.  Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Is Necessary for Normal Associative Inference and Memory Integration.

Authors:  Kelsey N Spalding; Margaret L Schlichting; Dagmar Zeithamova; Alison R Preston; Daniel Tranel; Melissa C Duff; David E Warren
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  What's the gist? The influence of schemas on the neural correlates underlying true and false memories.

Authors:  Christina E Webb; Indira C Turney; Nancy A Dennis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Schematic memory components converge within angular gyrus during retrieval.

Authors:  Isabella C Wagner; Mariët van Buuren; Marijn C W Kroes; Tjerk P Gutteling; Marieke van der Linden; Richard G Morris; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Portraying the unique contribution of the default mode network to internally driven mnemonic processes.

Authors:  Irit Shapira-Lichter; Noga Oren; Yael Jacob; Michal Gruberger; Talma Hendler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.