Literature DB >> 20014310

Kinetics of the UV-induced DNA damage response in relation to cell cycle phase. Correlation with DNA replication.

Hong Zhao1, Frank Traganos, Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz.   

Abstract

It has been reported that exposure to UV light triggers DNA damage response (DDR) seen as induction of gammaH2AX not only in S- but also in G(1)-phase cells. In the present study, in addition to gammaH2AX, we assessed other markers of DDR, namely phosphorylation of ATM on Ser1981, of ATM/ATR substrate on Ser/Thr at SQ/TQ cluster domains and of the tumor suppressor p53 on Ser15, in human pulmonary carcinoma A549 cells irradiated with 50 J/m(2) of UV-B. Phosphorylation of these proteins detected with phospho-specific Abs and measured by laser scanning cytometry in relation the cell cycle phase was found to be selective to S-phase cells. The kinetics of phosphorylation of ATM was strikingly similar to that of ATM/ATR substrate, peaking at 30 min after UV irradiation and followed by rapid dephosphorylation. The peak of H2AX phosphorylation was seen at 2 h and the peak of p53 phosphorylation at 4 h after exposure to UV light. Local high spatial density of these phospho-proteins reported by intensity of maximal pixel of immunofluorescence in the DDR nuclear foci was distinctly more pronounced in the early compared to late portion of S-phase. Exposure of cells to UV following 1 h pulse-labeling of their DNA with 5-ethynyl-2'deoxyuridine (EdU) made it possible to correlate the extent of DNA replication during the pulse with the extent of the UV-induced H2AX phosphorylation within the same cells. This correlation was very strong (R(2) = 0.98) and the cells that did not incorporate EdU showed no evidence of H2AX phosphorylation. The data are consistent with the mechanism in which stalling of DNA replication forks upon collision with the primary UV-induced DNA lesions and likely formation of double-strand DNA breaks triggers DDR. The prior reports (including our own) on induction of gammaH2AX in G(1) cells by UV may have erroneously identified cells initiating DNA replication following UV exposure as G(1) cells due to the fact that their DNA content did not significantly differ from that of G(1) cells that had not initiated DNA replication. (c) 2009 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20014310      PMCID: PMC2880399          DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  72 in total

1.  Cell proliferation and DNA breaks are involved in ultraviolet light-induced apoptosis in nucleotide excision repair-deficient Chinese hamster cells.

Authors:  Torsten R Dunkern; Bernd Kaina
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin.

Authors:  Lee Zou; David Cortez; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  The molecular perspective: ultraviolet light and pyrimidine dimers.

Authors:  D S Goodsell
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2001

Review 4.  UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review.

Authors:  Rajeshwar P Sinha; Donat P Häder
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 5.  DNA replication in the face of (In)surmountable odds.

Authors:  J E Cleaver; R R Laposa; C L Limoli
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  p53 and regulation of DNA damage recognition during nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  Shanthi Adimoolam; James M Ford
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2003-09-18

7.  A stepwise huisgen cycloaddition process: copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective "ligation" of azides and terminal alkynes.

Authors:  Vsevolod V Rostovtsev; Luke G Green; Valery V Fokin; K Barry Sharpless
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  A requirement for replication in activation of the ATR-dependent DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Patrick J Lupardus; Tony Byun; Muh-Ching Yee; Mohammad Hekmat-Nejad; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Fate of DNA replication fork encountering a single DNA lesion during oriC plasmid DNA replication in vitro.

Authors:  Kumiko Higuchi; Tsutomu Katayama; Shigenori Iwai; Masumi Hidaka; Takashi Horiuchi; Hisaji Maki
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  UV-induced ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR) activation requires replication stress.

Authors:  Irene M Ward; Kay Minn; Junjie Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  23 in total

1.  Relationship of DNA damage signaling to DNA replication following treatment with DNA topoisomerase inhibitors camptothecin/topotecan, mitoxantrone, or etoposide.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Paulina Rybak; Jurek Dobrucki; Frank Traganos; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 2.  Laser scanning cytometry for automation of the micronucleus assay.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Piotr Smolewski; Elena Holden; Ed Luther; Mel Henriksen; Maxime François; Wayne Leifert; Michael Fenech
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Sulfur Mustard Analog Mechlorethamine (Bis(2-chloroethyl)methylamine) Modulates Cell Cycle Progression via the DNA Damage Response in Human Lung Epithelial A549 Cells.

Authors:  Yi-Hua Jan; Diane E Heck; Debra L Laskin; Jeffrey D Laskin
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Cell synchronization by inhibitors of DNA replication induces replication stress and DNA damage response: analysis by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; H Dorota Halicka; Hong Zhao; Monika Podhorecka
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

Review 5.  Analysis of individual molecular events of DNA damage response by flow- and image-assisted cytometry.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Frank Traganos; Hong Zhao; H Dorota Halicka; Joanna Skommer; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 6.  Laser scanning cytometry: principles and applications-an update.

Authors:  Piotr Pozarowski; Elena Holden; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

7.  New insights into cell cycle and DNA damage response machineries through high-resolution AMICO quantitative imaging cytometry.

Authors:  A Tarnok; Z Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 8.  Cytometry of DNA replication and RNA synthesis: Historical perspective and recent advances based on "click chemistry".

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Frank Traganos; Hong Zhao; H Dorota Halicka; Jiangwei Li
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.355

9.  Expression of the p12 subunit of human DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ), CDK inhibitor p21(WAF1), Cdt1, cyclin A, PCNA and Ki-67 in relation to DNA replication in individual cells.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Sufang Zhang; Dazhong Xu; Marietta Ywt Lee; Zhongtao Zhang; Ernest Yc Lee; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  New biomarkers probing depth of cell senescence assessed by laser scanning cytometry.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; H Dorota Halicka; Frank Traganos; Ellen Jorgensen; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.